- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "So babies are having heart attacks in the womb?"... "Yes"
Posted on 11/25/22 at 1:32 am to Zarkinletch416
Posted on 11/25/22 at 1:32 am to Zarkinletch416
quote:
"So babies are having heart attacks in the womb?"... "Yes"
Fauci is a serial killer
Posted on 11/25/22 at 3:29 am to BlueJacket
quote:
Only an extreme right winger would want to take the rights of women away. FYI...there are no babies in the womb. If there were, you could get life insurance and write them off of your taxes prior to birth.

This site needs a block feature.
Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:51 am to BlueJacket
quote:Since you reject the right of God to dictate moral imperatives to His creation, you have nothing but your own subjective opinions, with no basis to make any truth claims, moral or otherwise. You have no basis for saying anyone has inherent value, even the women you pretend to support. Because of this, no one should care what you have to say on the matter. Your opinion is no better or worse than anyone else’s because of this.
Only an extreme right winger would want to take the rights of women away.
You are irrational and have no ultimate basis for rationality. You have no basis for morality. You have nothing. Repent of your sins and put your trust in Jesus Christ, who died on the cross for sin and to make peace between God and man. Repent and believe before you perish.
Posted on 11/25/22 at 7:06 am to BlueJacket
quote:
There are Forced Birthers who want to prevent women who miscarry from removing the dead fetus.
Still no link.
DU...
go back to your goose-stepping communazis.
Posted on 11/25/22 at 9:53 am to BlueJacket
quote:
If an unborn zygote were regarded as a person legally, they should have the same rights as anyone else.
Your assertion is that is you don’t have the same rights as everyone else you aren’t a person? This has to be the absolute worst argument you can make for the point you are trying to make. You don’t even realize it. If what you say is true, you make a compelling argument for the exact opposite of what you’re trying to say. Truly amazing to see. Do you realize why?
Shall we discuss some of the hundreds of situations where individuals do not have the same rights? Including abortions? Think hard. Do you realize the argument you just made?

This post was edited on 11/25/22 at 10:04 am
Posted on 11/25/22 at 2:21 pm to BlueJacket
quote:
You forced birthers
Birth: the act or process of bringing forth young from the womb.
Whether it’s dead or alive, natural or surgically assisted, they’re giving birth. Once a woman is pregnant with a child it’s coming out one way or another.
quote:BTW, a zygote is a fertilized egg. Within a week of conception it becomes an embryo. After 8 weeks it’s a fetus. These words are not interchangeable.
zygote
Posted on 11/25/22 at 3:05 pm to BlueJacket
quote:
Only an extreme right winger would want to take the rights of women away.
If you believe this was a right that was taken away, then identify the language used and the proper authority that first granted the right to an abortion.
I’d wager you’re not brave enough nor creative enough to do it.
Posted on 11/25/22 at 3:31 pm to davyjones
quote:
When you say “zygote,” what all are you referring to exactly
I'll take it slow since you not have had high school biology. Zygote is the medical term for the first stage of pregnancy. Really easy to search with your favorite search engine.
Posted on 11/25/22 at 3:34 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Shall we discuss some of the hundreds of situations where individuals do not have the same rights?
The discussion is simpler than this. You may not value women's rights but it's her body and she can make her own decision. You want to discuss the issue around viability and I personally can see how that has merit but I'm not the one who can get pregnant.
Posted on 11/25/22 at 3:52 pm to BlueJacket
quote:
Zygote is the medical term for the first stage of pregnancy
I did look into it and the definition is basically a fertilized ovum. Within the context of the subject of abortions, as y’all were quibbling about, do you hear of many abortions of “fertilized ovum” ie a “cell”?? Which is exactly why I offered you an opportunity to clarify. Frickin zygote. Lol
“Abortion is murded!! Zygotes are people too!!” Think you’ll ever see a protest sign using that terminology?
Posted on 11/25/22 at 3:55 pm to davyjones
quote:
“Abortion is murded!! Zygotes are people too!!” Think you’ll ever see a protest sign using that terminology?
Now go look up how many abortions happen days before birth. This is what Forced Birthers bring up. Surely there is a timeline somewhere before viability where most sane people would agree that abortion is the woman's choice. Abortion isn't used as birth control.
Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:12 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Still no link. DU...
Go back to your goose-stepping communazis.
Blue Waffle has 180 posts in 3 days….
It’s in the throws of a severe addiction.
Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:15 pm to LSUAngelHere1
quote:
LSUAngelHere1
What do you do when you can't back up a claim without evidence? You're the poster child. Try to create a strawman or an ad hominem. Take the L and move on.
Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:16 pm to BlueJacket
quote:
What do you do when you can't back up a claim without evidence? You're the poster child. Try to create a strawman or an ad hominem. Take the L and move on.
You don’t even know what any of that means…

Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:22 pm to LSUAngelHere1
quote:
You don’t even know what any of that means…
Thank you for making it obvious you have nothing of substanc to offer. Next.....

Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:34 pm to BlueJacket
quote:
I'll take it slow since you not have had high school biology.
What about high school English?
Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:36 pm to BlueJacket
quote:
The discussion is simpler than this. You may not value women's rights but it's her body and she can make her own decision.
That wasn’t the argument you made. You brought up legal rights of unborn children. Why now abandon that line of argument?
quote:
You want to discuss the issue around viability and I personally can see how that has merit but I'm not the one who can get pregnant.
I never said a word about viability. I simply pointed out the absurdity of the “argument” you were trying to make regarding legal rights. You thought you had a good point, but in reality it was the opposite point you were making.
Stop moving the goal posts and address the absurdity and irony of your legal “argument”. You’re in over your head here, son.
This post was edited on 11/25/22 at 4:39 pm
Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:41 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
you were trying to make regarding legal rights
You are so far off the topic, you don't even see it. I'll grant you your legal arguments if that makes you happy (doesn't mean I think you're right, but it's not relevant). Has nothing to do with the rights of women to choose. You think a zygote has protected rights. I don't.
Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:43 pm to BlueJacket
quote:
I'll grant you your legal arguments
No need. You were way off base and making the opposite argument you thought you were, legally. Which was quite amusing.
quote:
Has nothing to do with the rights of women to choose. You think a zygote has protected rights. I don't.
What about when it is no longer a zygote? Why are you limiting your time frame to that limited period? Very few jurisdictions don’t allow a woman to terminate a zygote. Do you even know what you’re arguing at this point?
This post was edited on 11/25/22 at 4:46 pm
Back to top
