Started By
Message

re: "So babies are having heart attacks in the womb?"... "Yes"

Posted on 11/25/22 at 1:32 am to
Posted by Gatorsingreenville
Sc
Member since Oct 2022
347 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 1:32 am to
quote:

"So babies are having heart attacks in the womb?"... "Yes"



Fauci is a serial killer
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
20943 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 3:29 am to
quote:

Only an extreme right winger would want to take the rights of women away. FYI...there are no babies in the womb. If there were, you could get life insurance and write them off of your taxes prior to birth.



This site needs a block feature.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
44096 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:51 am to
quote:

Only an extreme right winger would want to take the rights of women away.
Since you reject the right of God to dictate moral imperatives to His creation, you have nothing but your own subjective opinions, with no basis to make any truth claims, moral or otherwise. You have no basis for saying anyone has inherent value, even the women you pretend to support. Because of this, no one should care what you have to say on the matter. Your opinion is no better or worse than anyone else’s because of this.

You are irrational and have no ultimate basis for rationality. You have no basis for morality. You have nothing. Repent of your sins and put your trust in Jesus Christ, who died on the cross for sin and to make peace between God and man. Repent and believe before you perish.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
39977 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 7:06 am to
quote:

There are Forced Birthers who want to prevent women who miscarry from removing the dead fetus.


Still no link.

DU...





























go back to your goose-stepping communazis.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
53367 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 9:53 am to
quote:

If an unborn zygote were regarded as a person legally, they should have the same rights as anyone else.


Your assertion is that is you don’t have the same rights as everyone else you aren’t a person? This has to be the absolute worst argument you can make for the point you are trying to make. You don’t even realize it. If what you say is true, you make a compelling argument for the exact opposite of what you’re trying to say. Truly amazing to see. Do you realize why?

Shall we discuss some of the hundreds of situations where individuals do not have the same rights? Including abortions? Think hard. Do you realize the argument you just made?
This post was edited on 11/25/22 at 10:04 am
Posted by OGM
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2020
468 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

You forced birthers


Birth: the act or process of bringing forth young from the womb.

Whether it’s dead or alive, natural or surgically assisted, they’re giving birth. Once a woman is pregnant with a child it’s coming out one way or another.

quote:

zygote
BTW, a zygote is a fertilized egg. Within a week of conception it becomes an embryo. After 8 weeks it’s a fetus. These words are not interchangeable.
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
14662 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Only an extreme right winger would want to take the rights of women away.

If you believe this was a right that was taken away, then identify the language used and the proper authority that first granted the right to an abortion.

I’d wager you’re not brave enough nor creative enough to do it.
Posted by BlueJacket
Member since Nov 2022
230 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 3:28 pm to
(no message)
Posted by BlueJacket
Member since Nov 2022
230 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

When you say “zygote,” what all are you referring to exactly


I'll take it slow since you not have had high school biology. Zygote is the medical term for the first stage of pregnancy. Really easy to search with your favorite search engine.
Posted by BlueJacket
Member since Nov 2022
230 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

Shall we discuss some of the hundreds of situations where individuals do not have the same rights?


The discussion is simpler than this. You may not value women's rights but it's her body and she can make her own decision. You want to discuss the issue around viability and I personally can see how that has merit but I'm not the one who can get pregnant.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
33263 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

Zygote is the medical term for the first stage of pregnancy

I did look into it and the definition is basically a fertilized ovum. Within the context of the subject of abortions, as y’all were quibbling about, do you hear of many abortions of “fertilized ovum” ie a “cell”?? Which is exactly why I offered you an opportunity to clarify. Frickin zygote. Lol

“Abortion is murded!! Zygotes are people too!!” Think you’ll ever see a protest sign using that terminology?

Posted by BlueJacket
Member since Nov 2022
230 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

“Abortion is murded!! Zygotes are people too!!” Think you’ll ever see a protest sign using that terminology?


Now go look up how many abortions happen days before birth. This is what Forced Birthers bring up. Surely there is a timeline somewhere before viability where most sane people would agree that abortion is the woman's choice. Abortion isn't used as birth control.
Posted by LSUAngelHere1
Watson
Member since Jan 2018
9713 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

Still no link. DU...




Go back to your goose-stepping communazis.

Blue Waffle has 180 posts in 3 days….

It’s in the throws of a severe addiction.
Posted by BlueJacket
Member since Nov 2022
230 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

LSUAngelHere1


What do you do when you can't back up a claim without evidence? You're the poster child. Try to create a strawman or an ad hominem. Take the L and move on.
Posted by LSUAngelHere1
Watson
Member since Jan 2018
9713 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

What do you do when you can't back up a claim without evidence? You're the poster child. Try to create a strawman or an ad hominem. Take the L and move on.

You don’t even know what any of that means…
Posted by BlueJacket
Member since Nov 2022
230 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

You don’t even know what any of that means…


Thank you for making it obvious you have nothing of substanc to offer. Next.....
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
53367 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

I'll take it slow since you not have had high school biology.


What about high school English?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
53367 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

The discussion is simpler than this. You may not value women's rights but it's her body and she can make her own decision.


That wasn’t the argument you made. You brought up legal rights of unborn children. Why now abandon that line of argument?

quote:

You want to discuss the issue around viability and I personally can see how that has merit but I'm not the one who can get pregnant.

I never said a word about viability. I simply pointed out the absurdity of the “argument” you were trying to make regarding legal rights. You thought you had a good point, but in reality it was the opposite point you were making.

Stop moving the goal posts and address the absurdity and irony of your legal “argument”. You’re in over your head here, son.
This post was edited on 11/25/22 at 4:39 pm
Posted by BlueJacket
Member since Nov 2022
230 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

you were trying to make regarding legal rights


You are so far off the topic, you don't even see it. I'll grant you your legal arguments if that makes you happy (doesn't mean I think you're right, but it's not relevant). Has nothing to do with the rights of women to choose. You think a zygote has protected rights. I don't.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
53367 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

I'll grant you your legal arguments


No need. You were way off base and making the opposite argument you thought you were, legally. Which was quite amusing.

quote:

Has nothing to do with the rights of women to choose. You think a zygote has protected rights. I don't.

What about when it is no longer a zygote? Why are you limiting your time frame to that limited period? Very few jurisdictions don’t allow a woman to terminate a zygote. Do you even know what you’re arguing at this point?

This post was edited on 11/25/22 at 4:46 pm
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram