- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/25/19 at 7:13 am to Havoc
WITCH HUNT!
Posted on 1/25/19 at 7:13 am to UltimateSuperGenius
quote:
This is all about Stone being the middleman of info between the info Russia stole from the Dems and the Trump campaign
So the DNC finally let the FBI examine their server? And they proved Russians hacked them? And you provided a link to this instead of speculating and wishing based on your delusions and feelings?
Posted on 1/25/19 at 7:14 am to UltimateSuperGenius
quote:
This is all about Stone being the middleman of info between the info Russia stole from the Dems and the Trump campaign. Mueller has proof Stone lied to the FBI about this. That isn't collusion to you?
i think your account is wrong
Russia, apparently, tried to set up a meeting (and, allegedly, STone was one of the middlemen setting it up) with Trump's people (whether it was under false pretenses or not is not clear, but let's say it was clearly about dirt). at this meeting, they informed Trump's people of the hacked information. There doesn't seem to be much to indicate Trump's team really wanted that info or used it, and it was publicly released a short while later.
that's your "collusion". under the worst interpretation, what, exactly, is there to freak out about? hell even the "collusion" angle starts to have major issues once the information was released publicly.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 7:16 am to SlowFlowPro
Orange man bad
You know this
You know this
Posted on 1/25/19 at 7:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Russia, apparently, tried to set up a meeting
Yeah, I literally had a Russian set up a meeting with me about a contract last week... The meeting is scheduled for next week... You think I should cancel the meeting?
I mean there will be some obvious collusion going on...
Posted on 1/25/19 at 7:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There doesn't seem to be much to indicate Trump's team really wanted that info or used it, and it was publicly released a short while later.
Wasn't there something recently about Manafort sharing internal polling data with pro-Russian Ukrainian oligarchs?
Ostensibly to show his worth in that he still has access to such info?
This post was edited on 1/25/19 at 7:19 am
Posted on 1/25/19 at 7:20 am to Havoc
quote:
So, Again, No Collusion?
Muh process crimes.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 7:20 am to boosiebadazz
quote:OMG not polling data!
sharing internal polling data
Posted on 1/25/19 at 7:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Russia, apparently, tried to set up a meeting
But the Russians were more interested in getting the Magnitsky Act overturned.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 7:23 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
pro-Russian Ukrainian oligarchs
WOW, that is some scary shite...
Did he look like this dude?
Posted on 1/25/19 at 7:26 am to Jbird
"HRC is up 3 points in Wakalusa County, Wisconsin, Vlad, go buy some ads and foment some controversy?"
Would that be problematic if true?
Would that be problematic if true?
Posted on 1/25/19 at 7:26 am to boosiebadazz
Manafort is a snake who obviously thought Russia was his way to really make money. Manafort's industry is access, so it's not crazy to think he was displaying that value to the people who had been bankrolling his lifestyle the past decade or so.
relations with Russia was a major aspect of the campaign. HRC basically wanted war. Trump could have done it as a good faith gesture. that's not "collusion"
it could have been used for Russian online activity, but it's hard to know exactly what happened there b/c the data isn't really public (and, it appears their focus was on promoting far left concepts more than anything)
relations with Russia was a major aspect of the campaign. HRC basically wanted war. Trump could have done it as a good faith gesture. that's not "collusion"
it could have been used for Russian online activity, but it's hard to know exactly what happened there b/c the data isn't really public (and, it appears their focus was on promoting far left concepts more than anything)
Posted on 1/25/19 at 7:26 am to The Maj
Thirty three Thousand emails later and .... crickets from the DOJ.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 7:28 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:While the left memed and spouted off publicly about the dangers of Trump having the button...It was OMG twenty four seven but that was fine....it's fine.gif
HRC basically wanted war.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 7:28 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Would that be problematic if true?
"Hey guys, here is some cash, go make up some outrageous dossier about Trump... Throw some golden showers in and a reference to Obama for good measure..."
Is this what you are referring to?
Posted on 1/25/19 at 7:29 am to Havoc
He got charged with lying about coordinating actions between the campaign and (Russian-owned) Wikileaks.
Your house of cards continues to crumble.
Your house of cards continues to crumble.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 7:29 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
"HRC is up 3 points in Wakalusa County, Wisconsin, Vlad, go buy some ads and foment some controversy?"
Would that be problematic if true?
this will require a highly technical argument similar to Citizens United
Posted on 1/25/19 at 7:29 am to The Maj
They ignore this part with ease.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 7:30 am to BamaAtl
quote:
(Russian-owned) Wikileaks.
What?????
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News