Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

SJW: Laura Halbert

Posted on 11/2/22 at 7:22 am
Posted by Lobo Apple Sauce
Member since Sep 2014
388 posts
Posted on 11/2/22 at 7:22 am
There's is nothing new under the sun, it seems.

SJW, Laura Halbert, is turning Darrell Brooks into the victim after he victimized innocent people.
The American Conservative
quote:

Throughout the trial, the judge repeatedly cut off Mr. Brooks and refused to let him speak. The judge went so far as to deny Mr. Brooks his right to call additional witnesses and to testify himself. Mr. Brooks’ actions were completely justified given the way he has been treated the past year, and throughout his life.
Posted by Waffle House
NYC
Member since Aug 2008
3945 posts
Posted on 11/2/22 at 7:25 am to
quote:

Mr. Brooks’ actions were completely justified


I’m not going to bother giving the page additional traffic but please tell me that “actions” in the above statement refer to his court room antics.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95752 posts
Posted on 11/2/22 at 7:25 am to
Dumb cuunt.

He decided to represent himself and had a fool for a client.


Some big firm would have taken the case pro bono and given him a competent defense but it was unlikely he had a shot at an acquittal because he was guilty as hell.
Posted by LRB1967
Tennessee
Member since Dec 2020
15659 posts
Posted on 11/2/22 at 7:25 am to
Darrell Brooks deserves a doggy good night shot.
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
10929 posts
Posted on 11/2/22 at 7:27 am to
As it turns out, going to law school actually comes in handy when arguing a case in a real court room.



But I love that the law allows these imbeciles to showcase their ignorance.
Posted by MintBerry Crunch
Member since Nov 2010
4857 posts
Posted on 11/2/22 at 7:44 am to
quote:

Some big firm would have taken the case pro bono


Lol. Yeah right. Someone would’ve been forced to defend him. Nobody takes that shite out of the kindness of their hearts. What a waste of time.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48319 posts
Posted on 11/2/22 at 7:46 am to
quote:

Throughout the trial, the judge repeatedly cut off Mr. Brooks and refused to let him speak. The judge went so far as to deny Mr. Brooks his right to call additional witnesses and to testify himself. Mr. Brooks’ actions were completely justified given the way he has been treated the past year, and throughout his life.


So here is a person who, while lacking any basic knowledge of legal procedure, opines on the intricacies of legal procedure.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422596 posts
Posted on 11/2/22 at 7:55 am to
This appears to be fake and a big troll that TAC fell for.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51675 posts
Posted on 11/2/22 at 8:03 am to
quote:

The judge went so far as to deny Mr. Brooks his right to call additional witnesses and to testify himself.


Complete and utter horseshite. She asked him multiple times if he was going to testify and instead of answering he kept trying to argue a mooted point. She asked him something like 7-9 times if he planned on testifying, with many of the later attempts qualified with "if you do not answer this question directly I'll have no choice but to assume you will not be testifying on your own behalf".

This Lauren Halbert person is nothing more than a hacktivist looking for some attention.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
76505 posts
Posted on 11/2/22 at 8:06 am to
The "article" the above is referring to, is just a letter to the editor of a newspaper.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram