- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SIAP: Donald Trump Says He Never Swore Oath 'to Support the Constitution'
Posted on 11/28/23 at 7:08 pm to texridder
Posted on 11/28/23 at 7:08 pm to texridder
quote:(Assuming you've never assaulted someone) ... do you have evidence you didn't assault that cute brunette in High School in winter of your senior year?
Like totally dude. Like dude, that's rad, bro. Like do you have the first bit of like evidence to like literally support that Trump wasn't totally hoping for "Permanent President" status
Posted on 11/28/23 at 7:11 pm to teamjackson
quote:
both sides
The calling card of every leftist pretending to not be a leftist
Posted on 11/28/23 at 7:12 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
I don’t think anyone is lumping you in with the OP.
The OP is a jackass.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 7:44 pm to teamjackson
OP must be a “muh democracy” kinda guy
Posted on 11/28/23 at 8:30 pm to teamjackson
quote:
So, you're going to sit there and say supporting and upholding are 2 totally different things?
Upholding is an action.
Supporting is a state of mind - go, team!
Posted on 11/28/23 at 10:01 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Assuming you've never assaulted someone) ... do you have evidence you didn't assault that cute brunette in High School in winter of your senior year?
Tex asking you to prove a negative is on par for a moron that still cites the “bipartisan” senate committee report on Russia. Despite all the evidence that had come out since.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 11:32 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Assuming you've never assaulted someone) ... do you have evidence you didn't assault that cute brunette in High School in winter of your senior year?
That's weak horseshite.
Everyone knows what makes it looks like Trump wanted to be crowned.
What's your argument that he didn't?
Posted on 11/29/23 at 12:25 am to SDVTiger
quote:
You progtards are getting dumber as the tds intensifies
Are you too stupid to actually say what it is that you think demonstrates that progtards are actually getting dumber
-- or are you just too chickenshite to post it and risk getting embarrassed?
Posted on 11/29/23 at 12:59 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Tex asking you to prove a negative is on par for a moron that still cites the “bipartisan” senate committee report on Russia. Despite all the evidence that had come out since.
The only evidence that has come out since the Senate Report that is of consequence to your post is evidence that countervails the Report.
You must know what's in the Report if you know what new evidence counters that which is in the Report.
Then it shouldn't take much effort for you to describe the countering evidence and explain how it counters specific portions of the Report.
(That is unless you haven't actually read the Report, which, based on your avoidance of any specific discussion about the Report, anyone paying attention knows is the case).
Have at it, hayseed.
Posted on 11/29/23 at 3:44 am to texridder
quote:
Are you too stupid to actually say what it is that you think demonstrates that progtards are actually getting dumber
quote:
Trump wasn't totally hoping for "Permanent President" status
One of the 100s of thousands of examples
Posted on 11/29/23 at 4:29 am to texridder
quote:
Have at it, hayseed.
The report was compiled as a result of the Steele dossier which has been completely debunked. The entire basis of the investigation was a lie. A lie you still believe. Hayseed.
Posted on 11/29/23 at 12:13 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
The report was compiled as a result of the Steele dossier which has been completely debunked. The entire basis of the investigation was a lie. A lie you still believe. Hayseed.
You are completely ignorant yet again.
The Crossfire Hurricane investigation was initiated on May 31. The CF investigators were not made aware of the Dossier until September.
You and the rest of the Trumpaholics ignorantly still think it was the Dossier that started it.
You not being aware of that central fact proves that you never read the Senate Report and that you were straight out lying when you said that you had. Pitiful.
What a jackass.
Posted on 11/30/23 at 5:04 am to texridder
quote:
The Crossfire Hurricane investigation was initiated on May 31. The CF investigators were not made aware of the Dossier until September. You and the rest of the Trumpaholics ignorantly still think it was the Dossier that started it. You not being aware of that central fact proves that you never read the Senate Report and that you were straight out lying when you said that you had. Pitiful. What a jackass.
You fricking moron. Trump was not under investigation personally until May, 2017. 8 months after the dossier.
quote:
You not being aware of that central fact proves that you never read the Senate Report and that you were straight out lying when you said that you had. Pitiful.
This post was edited on 11/30/23 at 5:08 am
Posted on 11/30/23 at 12:38 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You fricking moron. Trump was not under investigation personally until May, 2017. 8 months after the dossier.
Are you lying to try to get out of looking like a dumb asse (likely, based on your history) or do you still not know when the Trump investigation started after looking it up?
Posted on 11/30/23 at 4:47 pm to texridder
quote:
Are you lying to try to get out of looking like a dumb asse (likely, based on your history) or do you still not know when the Trump investigation started after looking it up?
Read what I wrote you idiot. When did they begin PERSONALLY investigating Trump? All you do is lie, you lying liar.
This post was edited on 11/30/23 at 4:49 pm
Popular
Back to top


2







