- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SIAP: Donald Trump Says He Never Swore Oath 'to Support the Constitution'
Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:16 pm to dukkbill
Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:16 pm to dukkbill
quote:
Not specifically on "Support" v "Defend" but on the wider question of whether the 14th amendment is meant to disqualify someone for the office of President.
Which, I agree with, the 14th amendment can easily be read to exclude executive offices. If that is the case then why bring up the politically damaging defend vs support argument? It's semantics, sure, but it is not great politically.
1
Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:18 pm to teamjackson
SIAP Hillary said what difference does it make about dead people she was responsible for protecting.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:25 pm to teamjackson
quote:
And does that make you sleep easier at night? Knowing you've been duped by a notorious con-man?
Are you sleeping over at Aggie Hank's place ? This is the drivel we get from him.
I'm only on page four and your beat down has been epic. O have to assume you cannot read or understand our constitution nor its application nor any other legal Interpretation required for this OP
Where did you come from
Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:30 pm to dafif
quote:
Where did you come from
Been here longer than you, wet nap
Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:31 pm to teamjackson
quote:
, but literally nothing has negatively changed for me and mines when it comes to income, quality of life and savings.
Sometimes absurdity is show. In small amounts.
Tell me how your grocery bills have not gone up? Insurance?
How to tell you are FOS
Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:33 pm to dafif
quote:
Tell me how your grocery bills have not gone up? Insurance?
I took the capitalism route and made my own money with little push back from the gubment.
Sorry, not sorry, that I "got in" when the trends had the trajectory for the market.
That's what we're all striving for, right?
ETA: Groceries aren't an issue since my employer scales/adjusts for inflation. Imagine that...
This post was edited on 11/28/23 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:42 pm to teamjackson
quote:
ETA: Groceries aren't an issue since my employer scales/adjusts for inflation. Imagine that...
You are quite the piece of work. You must be young and very liberal. Spend all your time at sec rant and came over here a few days ago to say you were glad chauvin got attacked in prison and felt emboldened to come over her and spit your anti trump nonsense.
I'm not sure how your explanation of your boss raising your wages because of inflation conflates to not being impacted. Of course, in order to get paid slopping the pigs, your employer has to raise prices on the products that further raises prices. And I doubt you got a 20-25% raise to cover all the extra costs for insurance and of course presents unless you are making minimum wage .
In either event, best you run back home before the others on here co tiniest their beatdown
Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:48 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
Which, I agree with, the 14th amendment can easily be read to exclude executive offices. If that is the case then why bring up the politically damaging defend vs support argument? It's semantics, sure, but it is not great politically.
Did Trump bring it up in a campaign speech, tweet, etc? If so, then I agree with you. It has bad optics.
Nevertheless, I'm only aware of it being in the brief as one small part of the textual analysis as to whether 14A(3) applies to the office of President. IMHO, his attorneys have to bring it up on a brief of the issue. In most cases, the only persons reading those briefs are judges, litigants, and legal scholars. In those contexts, it may not have the same political impact. Of course, when the matter involves a President, people are paying more attention.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:52 pm to BBONDS25
At this point in the campaign, they're panicky, throwing stuff against the wall (in the form of accusations) hoping it'll stick.
During President Trump's term in office, we had Peace and Prosperity - now we have two ugly wars and American families struggling to make ends meet. It's a mess out there. We'll be lucky if we escape nuclear war.
Trump 2024 - Biden schemes for war and profit. President Trump schemes for Peace and Prosperity.
During President Trump's term in office, we had Peace and Prosperity - now we have two ugly wars and American families struggling to make ends meet. It's a mess out there. We'll be lucky if we escape nuclear war.
Trump 2024 - Biden schemes for war and profit. President Trump schemes for Peace and Prosperity.
This post was edited on 11/28/23 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 11/28/23 at 3:59 pm to dafif
Hey, ding dong, I'm my own boss.
But continue on! Please please please fear monger me into your own little world!!
But continue on! Please please please fear monger me into your own little world!!
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:05 pm to teamjackson
quote:
ETA: Groceries aren't an issue since my employer scales/adjusts for inflation.
quote:
Hey, ding dong, I'm my own boss.
Which one of these is not like the other???
This post was edited on 11/28/23 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:25 pm to teamjackson
quote:
Uhhhh, what?
Did you not say the NC_Tigah was a “gay” way of spelling it?
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:32 pm to dukkbill
quote:
dukkbill
I always enjoy your input.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:34 pm to teamjackson
quote:
I'm actually serious. I haven't been better off under any other president. Y'all will take this and run with it but my life hasn't ever been better than now.
I think this is probably your first honest post in this thread. I don’t doubt you at all. I do doubt it has anything to do with Biden’s policies.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:36 pm to teamjackson
quote:Good for you, seriously.
Thankfully, my track record in agriculture has been successful. Obama was president when I started the journey. Trump came along and it literally had no impact. Then Biden came along and it literally had no impact.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:37 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
This type of post bothers me more than anything. Just because someone supports another candidate, typically DeSantis, in the 2024 GOP primary doesn't mean we voted for Biden.
I agree. I don’t think anyone is lumping you in with the OP.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 4:38 pm to GumboPot
I’ve always thought the oath should be changed to include words that require adherence to the constitution.
The constitution is very well preserved, protected and defended in a vault at the national archives. Problem is, progressives have ignored it for over a century.
The constitution is very well preserved, protected and defended in a vault at the national archives. Problem is, progressives have ignored it for over a century.
Posted on 11/28/23 at 7:02 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Trump was totally hoping for "Permanent President" status
quote:
Like totally dude. Like dude, that's rad, bro. Like do you have the first bit of like evidence to like literally support that contention though?
Like totally dude. Like dude, that's rad, bro. Like do you have the first bit of like evidence to like literally support that Trump wasn't totally hoping for "Permanent President" status
Posted on 11/28/23 at 7:06 pm to texridder
quote:
Trump wasn't totally hoping for "Permanent President" status
You progtards are getting dumber as the tds intensifies
Posted on 11/28/23 at 7:07 pm to texridder
quote:
"Permanent President" status
What’s the problem?
Page 9 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News