Started By
Message
locked post

Should we have an elected judiciary?

Posted on 3/6/18 at 11:01 am
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
28340 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 11:01 am
Been seeeing a lot of stories about lawyers who put up tons of money to get these folks elected to the bench, of course expecting reciprocation later on. This is certainly a perversion of justice and is not in the benefit of the public as a whole.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98822 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 11:02 am to
No.

It's a blueprint for corruption, and results in complete retards getting on the bench.
Posted by Haughton99
Haughton
Member since Feb 2009
6124 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 11:02 am to
Hell no. Electing judges is how Roy Moores are made. Anytime you turn judges into politicians you make things worse.
Posted by Fa Sheaux Breaux
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2018
530 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 11:04 am to
Not unless you want more Trudy White and Bonnie Jackson types. They are all about politicking for that next election.
This post was edited on 3/6/18 at 11:05 am
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 11:14 am to
What could go wrong?

Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
28340 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 11:18 am to
quote:

t's a blueprint for corruption, and results in complete retards getting on the bench.


My friend who works for an insurance company was telling me about pi lawyers inviting judges to their suites for sporting events, fishing/hunting trips, only to appear before them in court. Does that shite really go on?
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36050 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 11:21 am to
Hell no. Judges should be independent of popular opinion in order to make the proper decisions, even if they are unpopular.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67096 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 11:24 am to
being appointed is no less a corrupt process. Politicians just appoint their friends with zero means for the people to recall them.

Judicial elections are corrupt AF, but at least voters have a mechanism to get rid of a bad judge. There's nothing that can be done regarding bad appointed judges.

The problem isn't that our judges are elected. The problem is that our elections themselves have been corrupted into being nothing more than naked bribery schemes.

What we need to be addressing is how our campaigns are financed and managed.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67096 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 11:28 am to
quote:

My friend who works for an insurance company was telling me about pi lawyers inviting judges to their suites for sporting events, fishing/hunting trips, only to appear before them in court. Does that shite really go on?


Judges cannot accept ANY gifts with monetary value. I'm not certain on how that applies to suite tickets.

I am sure hunting is ok.

The big loop hole for judges to get lavish treatment is the conference rule. Judges are expected to speak at law conferences and seminars. So the people who run the conferences (usually at a resort), put the judges up in nice suites with gift bags and what not.
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15417 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Does that shite really go on?



Yes.

The direct election of judges needs to end.
This post was edited on 3/6/18 at 11:37 am
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Should we have an elected judiciary?


Here's the thing though, the federal judiciary essentially is elected by virtue of their appointment by our elected POTUS and confirmation by our elected Senators at least in the vicarious sense. I personally would prefer the states adopt the federal model of appointing/confirming judges if that's feasible, electing judges through the direct political ballot box and associated with a political party to adjudicate legal claims in court is stupid as hell.
This post was edited on 3/6/18 at 11:46 am
Posted by Haughton99
Haughton
Member since Feb 2009
6124 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

udicial elections are corrupt AF, but at least voters have a mechanism to get rid of a bad judge. There's nothing that can be done regarding bad appointed judges.



The problem is that that 99% of the public is not qualified to decide who would and wouldn't be a good judge. I don't wan't judges making politically influenced decisions. I wan't them to decide cases based on the rule of law even with that decision is politically unpopular.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67488 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 12:05 pm to
My business law prof was telling me no matter how much we think our judicial system is crooked, it's 1000 times worse......and FWIW he had been disbarred
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80250 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 12:07 pm to
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98822 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

My friend who works for an insurance company was telling me about pi lawyers inviting judges to their suites for sporting events, fishing/hunting trips, only to appear before them in court. Does that shite really go on?


Yes.

There's a certain judge in the BR area that routinely is dined at a local steakhouse by the plaintiffs' bar. Not only does that judge enjoy the meal and the company, but she routinely orders an extra meal as well.
Posted by Jack Bauers HnK
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
5713 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 12:22 pm to
In Louisiana, we not only elect judges, we give them authority to award up to $50k without the bs filter of a jury.
Posted by lammo
RIP LAMMO
Member since Aug 2005
9358 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 12:24 pm to
And business and industry, insurance companies, insurance defense lawyers, and oil and gas companies give even more to judicial campaign chests.

It isn't just trial lawyers.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67096 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

And business and industry, insurance companies, insurance defense lawyers, and oil and gas companies give even more to judicial campaign chests.

It isn't just trial lawyers.


This. The trial lawyers, unions, and "non profits" give to the democrats.

Insurance companies and defense lawyers give to the republicans.

The big oil companies buy everyone.

Unless you're already well known or a district is heavily gerry-mandered in your favor, it takes at least $150k to hope to win a district judge race, $300k to win a spot on a court of appeal, and $500k to get a spot on the state Supreme Court.

Judges don't get paid anything near that.
This post was edited on 3/6/18 at 12:28 pm
Posted by Sidicous
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Aug 2015
17170 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 12:27 pm to
Take a look at the CBC and ask yourself this question again!

Do you really want a buncha Mad Max Waters and Rhinestone Cowgirl Empty Barrels sitting in judgement of whether or not your freedom or kids freedoms remain intact?
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
53383 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 12:29 pm to
You get a fair shake in law if the judge doesn't know either party personally. I always when I walk into a courtroom and the Jewish judge and lawyer I am up against are asking how the wife/kids are.

But, for real, the appointed federal judges who don't have much accountability actually end up being way more attentive/responsive to their cases than a lot of elected state court malcontents. I will concede that much of that has to do with them just being higher up in the food chain in terms of intelligence/work ethic, but it does make me re-think the elected judge thing.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram