- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should the status of Warnock and Ossoff be in question?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:43 pm to Willie Stroker
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:43 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:
Decision makers familiar with the voting and counting process anticipated fraud was highly possible, unless procedures were put in place to prevent it.
The procedures for signing yhe tapes are just to ensure the electronic vote tallies accurate, not to prevent fraud. Since there were multiple hand recounts of the paper ballots, the electronic tallies are kind of moot. If there had been some huge discrepancy between the original electronic totals and the hand recount totals, then there would be an issue.
1
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I hope you're not referencing the 315k vote story, b/c that doesn't indicate fraud.
Not only do you not add any value to this board, but you subtract from it. You're insufferable. Your sole intent is to divert legitimate discussions away from what's important and toward the minutiae and toward splitting hairs with definitions.
"Well yes, there are 315,000 votes that are in doubt which could easily, and probably would, change the outcome of the 2020 election, but let's not call it fraud. They were clerical errors. Or inadvertent oversights."
Why don't you just f**k right off, dude. It's like you want someone to believe that your concern is for any potential defendant in the case rather than the fact that a we had a sitting president and two senators who were/are in office due to a flawed election.
So stop being a disingenuous assh**e.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:31 pm to deuceiswild
quote:
Not only do you not add any value to this board, but you subtract from it. You're insufferable. Your sole intent is to divert legitimate discussions away from what's important and toward the minutiae and toward splitting hairs with definitions.
"Well yes, there are 315,000 votes that are in doubt which could easily, and probably would, change the outcome of the 2020 election, but let's not call it fraud. They were clerical errors. Or inadvertent oversights."
Why don't you just f**k right off, dude. It's like you want someone to believe that your concern is for any potential defendant in the case rather than the fact that a we had a sitting president and two senators who were/are in office due to a flawed election.
So stop being a disingenuous assh**e.
I suggest you also educate yourself on what actually happened
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:33 pm to burger bearcat
I predict this will be another multi-page thread with over 25% of the responses coming from one poster.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:33 pm to LawTalkingGuy
quote:
The procedures for signing yhe tapes are just to ensure the electronic vote tallies accurate, not to prevent fraud. Since there were multiple hand recounts of the paper ballots, the electronic tallies are kind of moot. If there had been some huge discrepancy between the original electronic totals and the hand recount totals, then there would be an issue.
Another fool inserting himself with no purpose other than to divert attention to shite that doesn't matter.
You know something? Criminals can totally admit to their crimes, and it can even be on tape or video, but if said confession was obtained improperly, it doesn't count. It cannot be used in court.
So pardon me for not giving a flying f**k whether any of this would have affected the final tally. Signatures were required. A chain of custody is required. Rules need to be followed. And in this case they weren't.
And therefore, the entire election can, and should be, called into question.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
The fact that you are pretentious enough to think you are educating anyone is truly amazing. And very sad. Your life must be empty
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I suggest you also educate yourself on what actually happened
We already know plenty enough. The precise nature and exact details don't even matter.
What matters, is that in some form or fashion, certain rules weren't followed during the 2020 election in the state of Georgia. The legitimacy of 315,000 ballots are in question. Failure to follow these rules makes it absolutely legit, and even necessary to question the validity of the entire election.
It's like a jury rendering a guilty verdict for murder based on mountains and mountains of solid evidence, then a week later the defendant attorney claims the confession his client made was obtained under duress, and therefore the whole trial should be called into question.
The attorney is right to do this, btw.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:45 pm to burger bearcat
Hell yes... And a certain Supreme Court appointee as well.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
But we have two sitting Senators that were elected because of clear fraud
What fraud, specifically?
I hope you're not referencing the 315k vote story, b/c that doesn't indicate fraud.
TDSFP gonna' TDSFP. Just a "clerical error" that had no bearing on the election, guys. Come on. Stop being MAGA "conspiracy theorists." Muh NO PROOF!!!!
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:47 pm to deuceiswild
quote:
We already know plenty enough. The precise nature and exact details don't even matter.
There you have CT theory 101.
We know what happened. Proof isn't necessary and we shouldn't even discuss the details or precise nature of what actually happened.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:48 pm to DawgCountry
quote:
The fact that you are pretentious enough to think you are educating anyone is truly amazing.
While the demographics involved do make it tough, I'm not a quitter.
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:09 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
It's a serious problem. ...but it's far too late to do anything about it.
Every vote they cast in the Senate since the election should be nullified along with any legislation and judicial appointments that passed with a 51-49 vote where their votes were “yes”
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
While the demographics involved do make it tough, I'm not a quitter. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
‘It’s the anonymous people on the internet’s fault that I’m not nearly as intelligent as I need them to believe that I am’
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:40 pm to NC_Tigah
They should investigate SFP for legal fraud. He's definitely billing some poor sap for time while he's on Tigerdroppings.
The Louisiana Bar should look into it.
Should be easy enough with his post history wide open for the world to see.
The Louisiana Bar should look into it.
Should be easy enough with his post history wide open for the world to see.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:42 pm to burger bearcat
Warnock was already re-elected in a non-contested election so even if your fantasy comes true, he is currently, as of today, a duly elected uncontested senator for Georgia.
Thanks Trump and Herschel Walker.
Thanks Trump and Herschel Walker.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:56 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
I predict this will be another multi-page thread with over 25% of the responses coming from one poster.
When his TDS flares up, he really gets rolling.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
Are you saying that no rules were violated, no processes circumvented, chain of custody was properly maintained, and that everything was done by the book in the 2020 election in the state of GA?
If that's not what you're saying, then how the frick can you possibly insert your retarded opinions into such a thread where people are discussing the validity of the election?
If that's not what you're saying, then how the frick can you possibly insert your retarded opinions into such a thread where people are discussing the validity of the election?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:51 pm to burger bearcat
Before the 17th Amendment, Senators sat at the discretion of the state legislatures and were appointed by the legislatures. The problem was that too many legislatures ended up dead-locked so the can was kicked down the road to popular election. The 17th Amendment was a mistake. It should have just forced a decision in a deadlock while keeping senators at the beck and call of the state legislatures.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News