- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Several precincts in VA had turnout rates above 100% in 2020.
Posted on 11/25/23 at 7:51 pm to GumboPot
Posted on 11/25/23 at 7:51 pm to GumboPot
I live in Chesterfield Co. & work in Henrico Co.,
both of which are blue. Henrico is going woke much faster than Chesterfield.
Oliver Anthony's "Rich Men North of Richmond" is somewhat accurate as the James River & the City of Richmond is what separates Chesterfield Co. aka "Southside" and Henrico Co.. Chesterfield "feels" a little more southern, not quite as congested, and certainly affluent, whereas Henrico is more hustle & bustle, a little more white collar, yuppie types, for lack of a better word.
I had a few pages saved from 2020 if you're curious..
Judge rules Virginia's late election law changes for mail-in ballots were illegal
Official Virginia Elections Board / VA.gov ~ 2020 Changes to Virginia’s Election Laws aigned into law by ol'' Black-Face Ralph Northam himself
both of which are blue. Henrico is going woke much faster than Chesterfield.
Oliver Anthony's "Rich Men North of Richmond" is somewhat accurate as the James River & the City of Richmond is what separates Chesterfield Co. aka "Southside" and Henrico Co.. Chesterfield "feels" a little more southern, not quite as congested, and certainly affluent, whereas Henrico is more hustle & bustle, a little more white collar, yuppie types, for lack of a better word.
I had a few pages saved from 2020 if you're curious..
Judge rules Virginia's late election law changes for mail-in ballots were illegal
Official Virginia Elections Board / VA.gov ~ 2020 Changes to Virginia’s Election Laws aigned into law by ol'' Black-Face Ralph Northam himself
0
Posted on 11/25/23 at 8:02 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
How is that ironic?
Because you have the same blind spot for sources you claim others fall victim to.
So it's ironic that you feign "alarm"
Posted on 11/25/23 at 10:02 pm to texridder
quote:
I can read what you write. You are just squirming around trying to get out of a bullshite, lying post.
You can’t read what I write for comprehension on the first try in almost any of my posts. This round is no exception.
Posted on 11/25/23 at 10:44 pm to the808bass
quote:
You can’t read what I write for comprehension on the first try in almost any of my posts.
I wonder why you won't answer why you used bogus population figures in your horseshite claims that WI had several instances of 100% + voter turnout- you lying POS?
Posted on 11/25/23 at 10:50 pm to texridder
quote:
you lying POS?
Oh. My. Typical liberal projection.
Posted on 11/25/23 at 11:37 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Typical liberal projection.
GFY loser.
Posted on 11/25/23 at 11:38 pm to texridder
quote:
GFY loser.
Yet another eloquent argument.
Posted on 11/25/23 at 11:43 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Yet another eloquent argument.
If you don't like it, go stalk somebody else, loser.
Posted on 11/25/23 at 11:53 pm to GumboPot
Why are we just hearing about this now? And not Dec. of 2020?
Posted on 11/25/23 at 11:57 pm to texridder
quote:
If you don't like it, go stalk somebody else, loser.
Stalk?
typical liberal projection. You bumped a two year old thread in a failed “gotcha” attempt towards me. You’re pathetic. 
Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:49 am to Turbeauxdog
You’re making an assumption about the author because you don’t like what his research and the hundreds of sources he cited reveal. You literally have read nothing he’s written. You simply don’t like what he’s writing about so you’re calling me ignorant.
That’s irony.
That’s irony.
This post was edited on 11/26/23 at 4:57 am
Posted on 11/26/23 at 5:08 am to LCA131
quote:
Some folks just love to vote.
Twice
Posted on 11/26/23 at 5:32 am to gymnopedies13
quote:
Not one iota of evidence of "voter fraud". Also duly noted conservatives only bitch about imaginary voter fraud when they get their asses handed to them in elections.
Oh, how soon we forget...the election-denying, electoral college-tampering, elector-intimidating, official gov't proceeding-obstructing, voting machine-attacking, peaceful transfer of power-preventing, hypocritical Democrats after the 2016 election.
The same hypocritical Democrats that have denied the past three GOP Presidential election victories.
Duly note that.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 5:39 am to gymnopedies13
quote:
Not one iota of evidence of "voter fraud".
You're right. There isn't one iota of evidence of "voter fraud"...there's a plethora of iotas of evidence of "voter fraud".
Posted on 11/26/23 at 6:22 am to 4cubbies
quote:
You’re making an assumption about the author because you don’t like what his research
No I'm drawing conclusions about the author because of the evidence provided by the his association with trash organizations. No man of integrity would do so.
quote:
You simply don’t like what he’s writing about so you’re calling me ignorant. That’s irony.
You're having trouble with cause and effect here, but that's pretty consistent with you.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 6:58 am to 4cubbies
quote:
So where did he get his numbers from if the official source of election data didn’t produce it?
Regardless of this particular instance being accurate or not, the basic question/argument is ludicrous.
The official source that produces the election data consists of the same people entrusted with policing the collection & preservation of that data.
And, therein lies the problem.
The fox guarding the henhouse...feathers stuck between his teeth and spittin' out yolk-soaked eggshell fragments, while telling you all the chickens and their eggs are just fine.
Most, if not all of the contested states
(and others) did one or more of the following;
Changed election laws illegally
Changed election laws in violation of their constitution
Changed election laws in violation of the US constitution
Violated their own existing laws
Violated existing federal laws
Violated or ignored court orders
Destroyed evidence
Denied access to evidence
Lost evidence
Ignored evidence
Used lawsuits to prevent audits
Used lawsuits to obtain consent decrees
Used voting machines certified by VSTL's without valid accreditation from the EAC
Etc...
So, using "official election data/results" does absolutely nothing to ensure legitimacy.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 7:23 am to GBPackTigers
quote:
Cute how you think the corrupt Secretary of State will show their incompetence
He has a point. You guys see something on twitter and run with it. That’s not a legit source. It might be true, but I don’t believe it because I haven’t seen a respectable source assert it.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 7:25 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
No I'm drawing conclusions about the author because of the evidence provided by the his association with trash organizations.
His book and the thousands of citations in it are all trash because he’s a fellow at an organization you don’t like. Well yeah, that makes WAAAYYYYYY more sense
quote:. You don’t like what I have to say so you’re again making random accusations to justify (to yourself) ignoring all the evidence that contradicts your position.
You're having trouble with cause and effect here, but that's pretty consistent with you.
But, please, tell me more about integrity….
Posted on 11/26/23 at 8:04 am to 4cubbies
quote:
he’s a fellow at an organization you don’t like.
You seem to be having trouble understanding that if you jump in a dumpster you smell like trash.
quote:
You don’t like what I have to say so you’re again making random accusations to justify (to yourself) ignoring all the evidence that contradicts your position.
I've seen your posting for about a decade now. It's all been incoherent rubbish. You think you're informed because you seek out trash written by lunatics that confirm your bias
quote:
But, please, tell me more about integrity
Not much to talk about.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:18 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
I've seen your posting for about a decade now. It's all been incoherent rubbish. You think you're informed because you seek out trash written by lunatics that confirm your bias
And you refuse to read anything that doesn’t confirm your own bias. You’re admitting that right now.
quote:
Not much to talk about.
Clearly.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News