Seth Rich's dad says Brad Baumann was assigned to them by the DNC and he has no idea why

So anything more than an image here?

Butowsky is the POS who was behind the fake FOX News story last week.

So the Rich family doesn't want Bauman speaking for them, and only tells it to dipshit Ed Butowski. The same Ed Butowski who hired Rod Wheeler who would go on to be the source for the new retracted Fox News story.

If the Rich family didn't want Bauman speaking for them why not just go on Hannity's show? Why tell one part-time Breitbart contributor then never follow up.

They also have access to Facebook, twitter, and other social media platforms.

"allegedly"

quote:

---

Why do that have a mouthpiece from the DNC?

---

They have a PR guy from a firm who generally works for liberal politicians. There are a couple of reasons why they have this guy.

1) He offered to do the job pro-bono. They don't want to deal with this shite, and it's a good offer

2) Maybe they are paying him. Seth Rich's parents probably trend liberal, so it wouldn't be surprising they gravitate to a left leaning spokesman.

3) Maybe the DNC did hire him. Seth Rich was their employee. Maybe they feel bad about all of the shite his parents are having to go through on this and offered Bauman's service.

Again if the Rich family wants to say something from Bauman there are a ton of opportunities. There is nothing suspicious about Bauman being their spokesman unless you already conclude the DNC killed their son and then work backwards.

quote:

---

Why do that have a mouthpiece from the DNC?

---

Good question.

quote:

---

stout

---

quote:

---

Liberal will dismiss the article since CNN isn't reporting

---

Everyone knows that only CNN, NYT, and WaPo can get away with using anonymous unsubstantiated sources bro. Anything else is just conspiracy theory Mumbo Jumbo.

quote:

---

They have a PR guy from a firm who generally works for liberal politicians

---

Why even make a big deal about it? Democrats not using this incident as a gun control talking point is also a red flag. One of their own gunned down walking home and not even a peep from democrats? Yea f*cking right.

quote:

---

I love how this board refuses to believe that Russia could influence this election.

This Seth Rich BS is a prime example of how gullible people are

---

Whats the difference between the two? Both are a possibility but we are gullible because we believe the one with the most evidence of it happening? Because there is no evidence of any Russian collusion, so how gullible does that make you?