- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Senior US officials clarify key provisions of the memorandum of understanding.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:05 am
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:05 am
This is from iranintl.com. Strange that it’s not spun more pro-Iran.
https://www.iranintl.com/en/202606174491
quote:
Senior US officials sought to clarify key provisions of the memorandum of understanding (MoU) with Iran, pushing back against reports that Tehran would receive access to frozen assets, sanctions relief or a multibillion-dollar reconstruction package upon signing the agreement.
The clarifications came after the text of the 14-point memorandum finally emerged on Wednesday, triggering a wave of reactions, competing interpretations and political criticism in both Tehran and Washington.
Speaking on a background call after the text was made public, the officials said the agreement does not commit Washington to any immediate economic concessions, but instead creates a framework under which incentives would be tied to Iranian compliance and progress toward a final deal.
The comments appeared aimed at countering interpretations in Iranian media that the memorandum would unlock large-scale financial benefits for Tehran before a comprehensive agreement is reached.
Addressing a provision in the MoU to create a reconstruction and economic development plan worth at least $300 billion, the officials said the language does not require the United States to contribute funds or provide direct financial assistance to Iran.
Instead, they said the provision would allow sanctions relief in the future if Iran fulfills its commitments, enabling third countries and private investors to participate in projects inside Iran.
The officials also stressed that any sanctions relief would be linked directly to progress on nuclear issues, meaning Tehran would only receive economic benefits in exchange for verifiable nuclear concessions, including the disposal of its stockpile of highly enriched uranium.
Frozen assets
The administration offered its strongest clarification on the issue of frozen Iranian assets.
Iran had originally sought access to restricted funds immediately upon signing the memorandum, according to the officials, but the final text tied any release of assets to implementation of the agreement and progress toward a broader settlement.
The officials said Iran ultimately accepted that no funds would be released automatically upon signing the MoU and that access to frozen assets would depend on what they described as demonstrable good behavior and compliance with the framework. Some frozen assets could be released during the negotiation period, they added, if Iran takes concrete steps demanded by Washington, including actions related to its nuclear program.
Strait of Hormuz
The officials also downplayed broader interpretations of the memorandum's provisions on the Strait of Hormuz, saying the relevant sections are focused on reopening the waterway and ensuring the free flow of commercial shipping.
They said the agreement is intended to restore navigation through the strait rather than establish a wider security framework for the Persian Gulf.
The officials said they beleieve regional countries would never agree to an arrangement that doesn't permit toll-free access to the Strait of Hormuz.
Miltary assets
The officials further indicated that the United States does not plan to immediately reduce its military posture in the region following the signing of the memorandum. Any future adjustments, they said, would depend on Iranian compliance and progress toward a broader agreement.
They also described direct communication channels established during the conflict between US forces and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as one of the factors that made the negotiations easier.
According to the officials, those channels reduced the risk of misunderstandings and allowed messages to be exchanged more quickly during both the fighting and subsequent diplomatic efforts.
Officials also rejected suggestions that the memorandum excludes nuclear issues, noting that the text explicitly commits both sides to negotiations over Iran's enriched uranium stockpile and broader nuclear activities.
The memorandum follows weeks of diplomacy led by regional mediators, particularly Pakistan and Qatar, aimed at ending a conflict that began on Feb. 28 when the United States and Israel launched strikes on Iran.
The framework is intended to halt the fighting, reopen the Strait of Hormuz and create a pathway toward a broader agreement.
The memorandum is expected to be formally signed later this week, after which negotiators will begin work on a final agreement envisioned under the framework.
https://www.iranintl.com/en/202606174491
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:11 am to loogaroo
Great post and thank you..... but, it won't be long before someone drops in and screams about "the 300 billion Iran is being paid by the US" bullshite!! Smh
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:16 am to loogaroo
quote:
Speaking on a background call after the text was made public, the officials said the agreement does not commit Washington to any immediate economic concessions, but instead creates a framework under which incentives would be tied to Iranian compliance and progress toward a final deal.
So, Trump is now guilty of an actual quid pro quo deal.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:18 am to loogaroo
quote:
The officials said they beleieve regional countries would never agree to an arrangement that doesn't permit toll-free access to the Strait of Hormuz.
The Strait of Hormuz has always been considered a public seafaring strait so I would in no way be of a mind to negotiate anything regarding his item. My stance on this would simply be The Strait of Hormuz is international territory and any language or action by Iran to "manage" the traffic through the strait would be considered a breach of international law/standards.
If they want to charge tolls for ships coming into their ports thats up to them ...
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:19 am to tigersbb
quote:
So, Trump is now guilty of an actual quid pro quo deal.
Which treaties are not?
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:39 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
So, Trump is now guilty of an actual quid pro quo deal.
Which treaties are not?
You do realize this was sarcasm related to the fake impeachment over his phone call to the Ukraine prosecutor.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:43 am to tigersbb
quote:
You do realize this was sarcasm related to the fake impeachment over his phone call to the Ukraine prosecutor.
It's hard to keep up these days.
Sorry, brother.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:44 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
Great post and thank you..... but, it won't be long before someone drops in and screams about "the 300 billion Iran is being paid by the US" bullshite!! Smh
I thought it was interesting coming from an Iranian outlet.
It’s clear our own media and the TDS infected are trying to spin this $300 billion as a handout from us, which is clearly not the case.
This little nugget below caught my attention:
quote:
Instead, they said the provision would allow sanctions relief in the future if Iran fulfills its commitments, enabling third countries and private investors to participate in projects inside Iran.
The officials also stressed that any sanctions relief would be linked directly to progress on nuclear issues, meaning Tehran would only receive economic benefits in exchange for verifiable nuclear concessions, including the disposal of its stockpile of highly enriched uranium.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:46 am to loogaroo
SFP will be along shortly to set you straight. He says otherwise and as we all know he is always right. Just ask him.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:47 am to tigersbb
How could you possibly think having terms or conditions met is a quid pro quo? Please let that be sarcasm
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:56 am to loogaroo
I don’t think Trump cares about the toll issue and even the Iranian’s have to know the $300B is BS.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:59 am to tigersbb
quote:
quid pro quo deal.
Uhh, if it's a written contract, it's not like a back room illegal promise, like Biden did
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:04 am to loogaroo
quote:
Instead, they said the provision would allow sanctions relief in the future if Iran fulfills its commitments, enabling third countries and private investors to participate in projects inside Iran.
Shareholder value always gets its taste, somehow, some way.
This post was edited on 6/18/26 at 11:08 am
Back to top

6






