- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Sen. Mike Lee CONFIRMS Vance could take over Thune's spot as Presiding Officer in the Sena
Posted on 6/6/26 at 11:05 am
Posted on 6/6/26 at 11:05 am
Posted on 6/6/26 at 11:15 am to udtiger
Is this power limited to the majority party? In other words, could a Republican VP assume power even over a Democratic majority Senate?
Posted on 6/6/26 at 11:18 am to udtiger
quote:
Well no shite
We're waiting.
Posted on 6/6/26 at 11:18 am to Bamafig
No and the VP only has real power if the senate is 50/50 to avoid a gridlock.
I also think Mike Lee is wrong because the VP can’t control the agenda of the senate only preside over it.
I also think Mike Lee is wrong because the VP can’t control the agenda of the senate only preside over it.
This post was edited on 6/6/26 at 11:20 am
Posted on 6/6/26 at 1:16 pm to DeBoar
Interesting note from the Heritage Foundation:
The Constitution seems to suggest that the Vice President is required to preside over the Senate, the text providing that the Vice President “shall be president of the Senate.” But for decades, officeholders have presided very little. In such cases, the Constitution empowers the Senate, in the Vice President’s absence, to select a “President pro tempore.”
The VP might actually have the powers discussed, but traditionally has not exercised it. Also in the article:
The Vice President can make parliamentary rulings, which can be overruled by the Senate.25 For instance, Vice President John Nance Garner made a series of pronouncements to the chamber in the 1930s. He formalized the custom whereby the Majority Leader would be recognized before all other Senators seeking to address the body. These statements, which went unchallenged by the Senate at the time, today undergird the Majority Leader’s principal formal power, which is to be recognized first and to propose the Senate schedule.26
As a practical matter, the Parliamentarian has narrowed the presiding officer’s authority over Senate procedure. This nonpartisan position was created in 1935 and provides technical advice on rules and precedents that the Vice President rarely ignores.
The Constitution seems to suggest that the Vice President is required to preside over the Senate, the text providing that the Vice President “shall be president of the Senate.” But for decades, officeholders have presided very little. In such cases, the Constitution empowers the Senate, in the Vice President’s absence, to select a “President pro tempore.”
The VP might actually have the powers discussed, but traditionally has not exercised it. Also in the article:
The Vice President can make parliamentary rulings, which can be overruled by the Senate.25 For instance, Vice President John Nance Garner made a series of pronouncements to the chamber in the 1930s. He formalized the custom whereby the Majority Leader would be recognized before all other Senators seeking to address the body. These statements, which went unchallenged by the Senate at the time, today undergird the Majority Leader’s principal formal power, which is to be recognized first and to propose the Senate schedule.26
As a practical matter, the Parliamentarian has narrowed the presiding officer’s authority over Senate procedure. This nonpartisan position was created in 1935 and provides technical advice on rules and precedents that the Vice President rarely ignores.
Posted on 6/6/26 at 1:30 pm to DeBoar
Mike Lee isnt wrong. He never said Vance can gain any more power than a tiebreaker.
Idjets on X aggregated it with a fake headline. Probably Beck.
They wont allow the SAVE ACT. They big mad...
Whatever their lameduck Tillis says is how they feel, using his traitor arse as cover.
He was voted in under tea party MAGA Trump. I know I voted for his fake arse years ago...So he is a traitor.
Idjets on X aggregated it with a fake headline. Probably Beck.
They wont allow the SAVE ACT. They big mad...
Whatever their lameduck Tillis says is how they feel, using his traitor arse as cover.
He was voted in under tea party MAGA Trump. I know I voted for his fake arse years ago...So he is a traitor.
Popular
Back to top

1







