- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sen. Brandon Smith- America's new dumbest Senator
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:00 pm to kywildcatfanone
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:00 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
All of that data has been proven to be manipulated for political purposes.
Some very nice looking blogs do say that. It isn't true.
0
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:02 pm to BugAC
quote:
Composition of Earth's atmosphere by volume.
The composition by absorption cross section is what's relevant.
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:08 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
To realistically have a significant reduction in CO2 would mean giving almost all modern civilized inventions. Many if which are life saving. No more plastic. No more computers. No more pesticides. No more fertilizer. No more air conditioning. No more long distance transportation.
Citation needed?
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:10 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
3% X 33.333333.. = 100%.
So what you're saying is we can potentially double the Earth's atmospheric Co2 in only 33 years
stick to low brow sarcasm and leave math to everyone else...we're not doubling the earth's Co2, we would account for only one year of Co2 emissions after 33 years. We, like every other species, age the earth so to speak.
While we're at it, we can all do the costly, inconvenient bullshite that is marketed to you by snake oil salesmen and it wouldn't put the slightest dent in that 3%...there is no change happening to the planet that is unnatural. Eradicating ourselves from the planet would only decrease carbon emissions by 3% annually (and that is under the moronic assumption that our absence would have no effect on the population of species and plant life)...so yeah, what the frick do you want to do about it?
You're essentially whining about the existence of life. If you don't like earth you can just giiit out.
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:22 pm to DelU249
quote:
stick to low brow sarcasm and leave math to everyone else...we're not doubling the earth's Co2, we would account for only one year of Co2 emissions after 33 years.
So what you're saying is, if we add 3% to the atmosphere every year for 33.34 years, we don't get past 100%.
Got it. You're obviously the math genius here, I defer to you.
This post was edited on 7/11/14 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:40 pm to Iosh
quote:
Citation needed?
LINK
HVAC is about 40% of all electric usage. I'll look for a citation in a bit. But bottom line, unless we are going to stop traveling and transporting goods, and go without A/C we aren't going to put a dent in CO2 production. Curley light bulbs won't do it.
This post was edited on 7/11/14 at 2:42 pm
Posted on 7/11/14 at 2:45 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
HVAC is about 40% of all electric usage.
Most homes are inefficiently air conditioned.
I wouldn't be surprised if that figure could be cut in half with the right technology (independent of the actual energy source).
Posted on 7/11/14 at 3:05 pm to SpidermanTUba
so imagine a big pie...that pie represents the carbon emissions for one year
we take up 3% of that pie. (and rightfully fricking so)
we're not increasing the pie 3%, we are 3%...if we were at 0% we wouldn't be having this lovely chat about how fricking stupid you are...
so after 33.3 years our carbon emissions would be the whole pie...
show me where anything is being doubled...I mean look at your own equation
.03*33.3 - when you double something, you multiply a number by 2...
god I cannot believe you are this fricking stupid.
IT TAKES US 33 YEARS TO PRODUCE WHAT IT TAKES THE EARTH COLLECTIVELY ONE YEAR TO DO =/= DOUBLING THE EARTH'S CARBON EMISSIONS
you're killing me.
"wouldn't life be better if it didn't exist at all" - Spiderman NOWAYIWENTTOTU ba
we take up 3% of that pie. (and rightfully fricking so)
we're not increasing the pie 3%, we are 3%...if we were at 0% we wouldn't be having this lovely chat about how fricking stupid you are...
so after 33.3 years our carbon emissions would be the whole pie...
show me where anything is being doubled...I mean look at your own equation
.03*33.3 - when you double something, you multiply a number by 2...
god I cannot believe you are this fricking stupid.
IT TAKES US 33 YEARS TO PRODUCE WHAT IT TAKES THE EARTH COLLECTIVELY ONE YEAR TO DO =/= DOUBLING THE EARTH'S CARBON EMISSIONS
you're killing me. "wouldn't life be better if it didn't exist at all" - Spiderman NOWAYIWENTTOTU ba
Posted on 7/11/14 at 3:07 pm to SpidermanTUba
oh you edited, are you now backing away from "doubling" or you don't want everyone to see how fricking retarded you are...I don't blame you.
also you didn't address another point of the post because you have no leg to stand on and that's before we factor in how fricking stupid you are.
also you didn't address another point of the post because you have no leg to stand on and that's before we factor in how fricking stupid you are.
Posted on 7/11/14 at 3:10 pm to moneyg
that shite is sig worthy
Posted on 7/11/14 at 3:17 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
So what you're saying is we can potentially double the Earth's atmospheric Co2 in only 33 years
I just wanted to get this before you edited
we're doubling the earth's carbon emission?
33 years of carbon emission...to make it easier for you let's say our 3% is excess and we deserve to die
so we add a years worth at the end of that 33 year period
34 years worth of carbon in 33 years...let's do some spidermantuba herpy dertpy math, and bam that's double trouble man
Posted on 7/11/14 at 3:33 pm to DelU249
quote:
we're not increasing the pie 3%, we are 3%...
You can't seriously be this ill-informed.
quote:
so after 33.3 years our carbon emissions would be the whole pie...
...and the rest of the pie conveniently disappears.
:rotflmao:This post was edited on 7/11/14 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 7/11/14 at 3:41 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
pie conveniently disappears
who said that
it's painful to watch man, you've been nailed to wall...it is time to stop talking about the environment, or things in general. Go take a break show me how in 33 years WE are doubling the co2 levels
I would like to go back to pointing out your equation that I'm sure you regret posting, especially since you like to boast about your intelligence, but I'll leave it to you...
I want you to explain how you arrived at statement you made as fact...show us all how in 33 years we've doubled earth's co2...:sitsbackwaitingforhislaugh:
Posted on 7/11/14 at 3:43 pm to DelU249
quote:
show me how in 33 years WE are doubling the co2 levels
Just going on your 3% number!
This post was edited on 7/11/14 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 7/11/14 at 3:44 pm to SpidermanTUba
everyone,
tuba is about to scientifically and factually prove that WE are doubling the earth's atmospheric co2 in 33 years
WE, and only WE are DOUBLING earth's atmospheric co2...
please there is no need to thank me
all thanks goes to spidermantuba who already is, but is about to further embarrass himself
tuba is about to scientifically and factually prove that WE are doubling the earth's atmospheric co2 in 33 years
WE, and only WE are DOUBLING earth's atmospheric co2...
please there is no need to thank me
all thanks goes to spidermantuba who already is, but is about to further embarrass himself Posted on 7/11/14 at 3:46 pm to DelU249
quote:
WE, and only WE are DOUBLING earth's atmospheric co2...
I didn't say we did you unintelligible goof ball. I said we could POTENTIALLY double it in 33 years. Obviously if you add 3 parts in 100 to the present amount and it doesn't go anywhere - it doubles in 33 years. Again - your numbers - not mine.
This post was edited on 7/11/14 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 7/11/14 at 3:46 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
Most homes are inefficiently air conditioned.
I wouldn't be surprised if that figure could be cut in half with the right technology (independent of the actual energy source).
What about plastics? Are you willing to do without plastics? Because everything you touch around you is made up of some form of oil based plastic.
Posted on 7/11/14 at 3:47 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
Just going on your 3% number!
oh, come on now, show us how at a static 3% we are doubling earth's co2 composition
and please I love that you're using "my" 3%
Posted on 7/11/14 at 3:49 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
I said we could POTENTIALLY double it in 33 years.
No, WE couldn't. First off, CO2 is a miniscule component to our atmosphere. Secondly Americans are a miniscule component to the total output of "man mande" global warming, as you call it.
So WE, as in Americans couldn't double the amount of CO2 produced to double the amount in 33 years without some significantly devestating accident, such as every power plant in America explodes simultaneously.
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News