- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Selling “the Illusion of Access”
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:10 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:10 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I am starting to believe the idea that Hank is a total fraud has some merit.
He cannot be this stupid.
Yeah - this one was a real wake=up. not like Hank at all.
I have selected Hank as probably the LEAST offensively stupid of all the pro-DEM posters on this board. Hank usually has some relation to a reasonable take on stuff - always to the left, but not obscenely so.
Then comes this post - about as dumb a take as I can imagine - doesn't sound like Hank at all.
This post was edited on 8/1/23 at 12:11 pm
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:11 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Just attributing to me every position that you think is unreasonable.
If there's an appreciable difference between you, CelticDog, BamaAtl and the other progressive filth on this board, I haven't seen it.
Do you believe the 2020 election was on the up and up? That Joe Biden received 81M legitimate votes from individual, legal voters?
Have you ever used the word "insurrection" in earnest when describing the events at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021?
Have you ever defended "drag queen story hour" or advancement of the Alphabet People agenda in their quest to expose their deviant subculture to school children?
Have you mischaracterized Sound of Freedom and other efforts to expose human trafficking as "Qanon nonsense"?
If "Yes" any/all the above, you're just an interchangeable NPC who is gleefully assisting in the subversion of our republic by larger powers who'd just as soon see you executed in the streets with the rest of us who are dissidents speaking out against their march to conquest.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:11 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Per Archer, Hunter Biden was basically just selling his name.
so did Billy Carter and Ron Reagan Jr. Just the latest in a very, very long line of presidential offspring, siblings and collateral relatives who have taken advantage of their position.
as far as I can tell, the only real difference is that Hunter Biden is the biggest trainwreck of them all.
No, the real difference is that Joe was involved in those transactions. He met with and talked to the foreign entities. This revelation happened after Biden denied having done this. In fact, he said he was never involved at all. Furthermore, Hunter's value was solely based on his ability to influence his father. Furthermore, money was funneled to shell companies and then distributed to Biden family members.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:12 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
always to the left, but not obscenely so.
You must have missed the blacksplaining and defense of pedos and defense of drag queen story hour threads that Hanky is famous for...
This take doesn't surprise me from Hanky...
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:12 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:I try to give everyone the benefit of the same doubt. I loathe Donald Trump, but you don’t see me calling him a felon either.
Before I mentally convict a man of felonies, I want to see more-substantial proof.quote:
That is a perfectly sane - and required - stance for a defense attorney in a courtroom.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:15 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
Then comes this post - about as dumb a take as I can imagine
If you keep them talking long enough, they reveal themselves.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:23 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
So, you impute wrongdoing to him on evidence that is flimsy at best.
The amounts wired to Hunter/Jim as listed in the various bank records already match the supporting documentation provided by the IRS whistleblower(s).
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:24 pm to VoxDawg
quote:I think that Trump lost the election the moment the first state official decided to change election laws as an overreaction to COVID, often in procedurally-deficient ways. I also think that all of the allegations of midnight shenanigans are a distraction from that fact.
Do you believe the 2020 election was on the up and up? That Joe Biden received 81M legitimate votes from individual, legal voters?
quote:never. I have belittled the ignorant use of the term, and I usually refer to a events of that day as LARPing gone wrong.
Have you ever used the word "insurrection" in earnest when describing the events at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021?
quote:I see it as an attempt to gain main stream acceptance. I reject the ridiculous notion held by so many of you people that all of these folks are trying to frick your children in a library broom closet.
Have you ever defended "drag queen story hour" or advancement of the Alphabet People agenda in their quest to expose their deviant subculture to school children?
quote:no. I have only acknowledged that there are questions as to how factually accurate the movie is, because the author has been subject of repeated accusations of exaggerating the story.
Have you mischaracterized Sound of Freedom and other efforts to expose human trafficking as "Qanon nonsense"?
This post was edited on 8/1/23 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:26 pm to AggieHank86
“Illusion of Access” is right up there with “Mostly Peaceful Protests” on the bullshite meter
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:28 pm to VoxDawg
quote:and I think that this sentence is a perfect encapsulation of the viewpoint of a hyperpartisan individual who is in capable of any sort of nuanced analysis
If “Yes" any/all the above, you're just an interchangeable NPC who is gleefully assisting in the subversion of our republic by larger powers who'd just as soon see you executed in the streets with the rest of us who are dissidents speaking out against their march to conquest.
This post was edited on 8/1/23 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:28 pm to moneyg
quote:
Furthermore, Hunter's value was solely based on his ability to influence his father.
Yep. Watch how much Hunter’s paintings are worth after Joe is done.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:29 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Look, you knee-jerk Trump-haters don't like the man and don't like his policies. So, you impute wrongdoing to him on evidence that is flimsy at best. Before I mentally convict a man of felonies, I want to see more-substantial proof.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:30 pm to moneyg
quote:
No, the real difference is that Joe was involved in those transactions. He met with and talked to the foreign entities. This revelation happened after Biden denied having done this. In fact, he said he was never involved at all. Furthermore, Hunter's value was solely based on his ability to influence his father. Furthermore, money was funneled to shell companies and then distributed to Biden family members
His outright lies in the 2020 debates will be forgotten by the 2024 debates.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:31 pm to AggieHank86
so did Billy Carter and Reagan Jr. put their office holding family members on the line to "sell the brand?"
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:31 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
You forgot the part where Hunter said he gives 10% to the big guy.
One cannot "forget" something as to which there is no proof.
In hunter's emails, he complained that he has to give half of his income to his dad. So, you're right, it was 50%.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:32 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
and I think that this sentence is a perfect encapsulation of the viewpoint of a hyperpartisan individual
The sad thing is thats exactly how many feel about you.
Youre no libertarian.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:32 pm to MikkUGA
quote:Faggie always ignores things like this on his crusades.
Well Burisma got Shokin fired, the russians got left off the sanctions list and China got the tariffs lifted......so
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:33 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I try to give everyone the benefit of the same doubt
Yeah - that is a given -
But this is not a courtroom. Believe it or not, many of us are really seeking more information. I would be GLAD - even DELIRIOUSLY so - to be convinced that some of my fears are ill-founded.
But it would take a reasonable discussion about 'theories' and 'obserations' and 'impressions' to refine those items. I am only interested in learning -
I have chosen YOU as one of the most likely to provide anything worth discussing. Most of the other Dem-defenders on here are stupid as hell.
When I come to the PT board, I seek out your posts. I have never seen a post from you so detached from any reasonable conclusion as this one. You would have to have access to information that is not available to the rest of us to hold that opinion.
Or else be under the impression that this is a courtroom.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:34 pm to RogerTheShrubber
"right of center libertarian".
Lol
Lol
Back to top


2








