Started By
Message

re: Seems one party roundly supports mail in voting and one party opposes

Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:15 pm to
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28893 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

I see, so Obama promising healthcare for all was a pay off?
Nope, quite the opposite. I'm claiming that neither tax breaks, nor healthcare, nor a bottle of water on the bus are payoffs.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28893 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

quote:

So simple to assume that your "team" plays fair at all times, isn't it?
Did I make that claim?

That's kind of what this whole thread is about, isn't it?

You laughed at the suggestion that a purge of voter rolls could have nefarious intent.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73969 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

Nope, quite the opposite. I'm claiming that neither tax breaks, nor healthcare, nor a bottle of water on the bus are payoffs.
okay, how about paying ministers to push your candidates?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Member since Sep 2003
125490 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

I don't know the best solution.
Perhaps the best solution is to start with honesty.

In light of a leftist plowing into a tent of Trump supporters who were registering voters, would you like to reconsider the idiotic assertion that "every single thing the GOP does regarding voting has the effect that only fewer people can vote."
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28893 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Sure just like VbM is fraught with potential illegal activities.
I agree. I lean toward do not support.
quote:

And he has awaken the R Party, you think people are going to set this one out?
I think that happened 4 years ago. You think there was much room for improvement?

No sense arguing over it, we'll just see in November.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73969 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

I think that happened 4 years ago. You think there was much room for improvement?
I do.
quote:

No sense arguing over it, we'll just see in November.
Indeed we will.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28893 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:22 pm to
Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
31868 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:23 pm to
This is a great OP. Doesn’t this scenario eliminate the “it’s racist” option for Democrats in the argument?

Or does the racist Coronavirus deaths meme put it back in play?

Seems to me Republicans need to use data to challenge the aforementioned meme.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73969 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:24 pm to
Interesting article. LINK
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28893 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

A tax cut helps many. Am I wrong?
To an extent, obviously yes. But it should be equally clear that if taxation is too low, some necessary services and programs break down, and more are hurt than helped.

The question is always what is the optimal level and distribution of taxation, and that is a very difficult question to answer. And the "right" answer changes constantly with the political and economic climate.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28893 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

ORLY?
Easier than it is to show up in a same day registration, claim eligibility, and vote?
Easier than it is to identify folks who remain registered despite having moved or died, and harvest their eligibility?
Now we have to argue which method(s) of election manipulation are easier?
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28893 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

okay, how about paying ministers to push your candidates?
We're getting into muddy waters here, aren't we?

Many pastors push R candidates, paid (tithes?) or not.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73969 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

Many pastors push R candidates, paid (tithes?) or not.
That's a little more in the Dem Party, GOTV in black communities.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28893 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

Perhaps the best solution is to start with honesty.
Always a strong start.
quote:

In light of a leftist plowing into a tent of Trump supporters who were registering voters, would you like to reconsider the idiotic assertion that "every single thing the GOP does regarding voting has the effect that only fewer people can vote."
I was clearly referring to policy. Obviously the GOP will do what they can to get R's registered.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

Many pastors push R candidates, paid (tithes?) or not.


Not really. And not nearly as many as push the D candidate. Go into just about any black church on a Sunday around election time. You'll leave knowing exactly who to vote for in every race.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28893 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

That's a little more in the Dem Party, GOTV in black communities.
What do you suggest? Government should start cracking down on churches? Investigations? That sounds like a bad idea.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73969 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

What do you suggest? Government should start cracking down on churches? Investigations? That sounds like a bad idea.
That whole separation of church and state things with tax free is a little sticky.
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
29552 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

everyone votes dems win.




i'll be honest as a conservative and say that this is a true statement.

i think that even if we outlawed VbM (outside of military) and had compulsory voting on election day democrats would take the majority in most elections.

however, conservatives as a whole are more invested in the outcomes of elections due to more skin in the game, so show up more often than a middle of the road voter to sway most turn outs. not that i disagree with liberals ( not BS progressives) really often, but a classical liberal position doesn't exactly incline itself to more involvement in the electoral process.

i.e. a conservative actively doesn't want the government effing with their life so will go out and vote to ensure that, while a liberal has more of a "go with the flow" lackadaisical attitude that may or may not ensure voting for more government involvement. i.e. Bernie has a shite ton of people promoting him, but not the same amount of people coming to vote for him.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28893 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

Not really.
Well, I've only sat through sermons from about 5 pastors in my entire life, and every one of them at one time or another "suggested" who we should vote for.
quote:

And not nearly as many as push the D candidate. Go into just about any black church on a Sunday around election time. You'll leave knowing exactly who to vote for in every race.
You're probably right. Jesus was probably a D, though.

I don't even understand the point of this sidetrack, though.
Posted by 93and99
Dayton , Oh / Allentown , Pa
Member since Dec 2018
14400 posts
Posted on 4/23/20 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

TDS. Seriously. Trump is probably the worst thing that could have happened to the republican party. He has motivated a lot of people to get more involved in politics.



Obama is the reason for Trump.

Obama flat out sucked.

Why can't dumb Liberals understand that ?
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram