- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Section 224 of 2027 National Defense Authorization Act
Posted on 6/3/26 at 12:17 am
Posted on 6/3/26 at 12:17 am
This is stirring up some big controversy...is Congress getting this passed?
LINK
Section 224 of the proposed Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) outlines the "United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative." It directs the Secretary of Defense to appoint a single official to coordinate military and defense-industrial cooperation between the two nations.The initiative focuses heavily on intertwining the U.S. and Israeli defense supply chains and accelerating the integration of joint technologies into U.S. military programs of record. Key details of the proposed provision include:
Political Response and Debate:The provision has sparked both strong support and vocal bipartisan concern:
Supporters: Backers argue that the measure strengthens American security and streamlines the adoption of advanced Israeli technology and innovations into the U.S. military.
Opponents: Critics and advocacy groups have raised concerns over U.S. sovereignty, the integration of data systems, and the entangling of U.S. and Israeli defense acquisition. Some lawmakers have pledged to introduce amendments to strip this language from the larger NDAA bill
LINK
Section 224 of the proposed Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) outlines the "United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative." It directs the Secretary of Defense to appoint a single official to coordinate military and defense-industrial cooperation between the two nations.The initiative focuses heavily on intertwining the U.S. and Israeli defense supply chains and accelerating the integration of joint technologies into U.S. military programs of record. Key details of the proposed provision include:
Political Response and Debate:The provision has sparked both strong support and vocal bipartisan concern:
Supporters: Backers argue that the measure strengthens American security and streamlines the adoption of advanced Israeli technology and innovations into the U.S. military.
Opponents: Critics and advocacy groups have raised concerns over U.S. sovereignty, the integration of data systems, and the entangling of U.S. and Israeli defense acquisition. Some lawmakers have pledged to introduce amendments to strip this language from the larger NDAA bill
This post was edited on 6/3/26 at 12:58 am
4
Posted on 6/3/26 at 12:50 am to RBTiger
Integrating military technology with a country who stole our nuclear secrets within my time on Earth is something else. Best ally ever.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 12:59 am to psk_Vol
We can’t keep anything secret. There can’t be many countries out there that hasn’t stole secrets from us at some point. Russia has nukes because they stole the plans from us. I certainly wouldn’t get all bent out of shape because the Israel did it. Besides I’m sure they stole it with our help if the truth was known about it.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:02 am to RollingwiththeTide
Or like with what Obama and Hilary did selling our sworn adversary and largest state sponsor of terrorism American uranium and gave them plane loads of cash money.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:08 am to AlterEd
I don’t know why we can’t keep our tech to ourselves. We spend all this time and money developing this stuff to give ourselves an advantage and then we let people steal it. For instance I think China has a jet that looks a lot like an F-35. Wonder where they came up with the plans to build that jet.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:20 am to RollingwiththeTide
quote:
Wonder where they came up with the plans to build that jet
Obama. The same a-hole who gave them contracts to supply our Navy steel instead of sourcing it here in the US, which they promptly began selling us sub-par steel, because of course they would, and also gave them contracts to build navigation systems for our naval vessels as well. Which, then we had that issue where our boats started just running into each other all the time.
Obama was a literal terrorist in the White House.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:24 am to RBTiger
I am as pro-Israel as anyone can be, but I do not want to share command structure on anything like military and defense issues as this would seem to do. I would not want that with any country. Working together is one thing, but, on the surface this seems to go well beyond that. Thanks for posting it, I have new reading material to consume now.
A bridge too far.
quote:
The initiative focuses heavily on intertwining the U.S. and Israeli defense supply chains
A bridge too far.
This post was edited on 6/3/26 at 1:26 am
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:29 am to AlterEd
Just think Obama isn’t even the most dangerous and worst President we have had in the last 20-25 years. Biden easily has both of those titles. That’s really scary when you think about it. It was pretty easy to see that both Obama and Biden were extremely unqualified for the job of President and shouldn’t have been anywhere near the levers of power. Yet somehow people managed to vote them in office anyway.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:11 am to RollingwiththeTide
quote:And its not all stolen, but unfortunately we have horrible treasonous "leaders"...on both sides. Lacking the ability to see past their nose.
I don’t know why we can’t keep our tech to ourselves. We spend all this time and money developing this stuff to give ourselves an advantage and then we let people steal it
The timeline of how China got ahold of Magnequench, is infuriating.
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:33 am to RBTiger
Why does it need to be written into a bill to cooperate with Israel? They're an ally. Isn't that what allies do?
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:47 am to RBTiger
quote:
The initiative focuses heavily on intertwining the U.S. and Israeli defense supply chains and accelerating the integration of joint technologies into U.S. military programs of record.
Exactly WTF does the US gain from this? There are no supply chains (plural). There is one defense supply chain, ours, and they should benefit from it as long as they behave and benefit US interests.
The second they step out of line, we should cut them loose like any other proxy. That's how empire works.
But that's in a perfect world, of course. Legislation like this comes from shitbag elected leaders trying out-do each other pandering to their AIPAC handlers. Bunch of sold out scumbags.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News