Started By
Message

re: Seattle’s new soda tax proves prog pols FAIL

Posted on 1/6/18 at 11:33 am to
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13494 posts
Posted on 1/6/18 at 11:33 am to
quote:

How fricking stupid are these people?

Pretty darn smart actually.

They know their voters ARE stupid and will not blame them for price increases.

It’s like property tax hikes. Renters blame their greedy landlords for their rent increases!
Posted by DaGarun
Smashville
Member since Nov 2007
26184 posts
Posted on 1/6/18 at 11:51 am to
Well, at least they took care of themselves (as usual). From the Seattle Times article:
quote:

Also exempted are sugary beverages that have milk as their primary ingredient, such as lattes supercharged with sweet syrups

Off to Starbucks!
Posted by CarrolltonTiger
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2005
50291 posts
Posted on 1/6/18 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

For the tax to truly work as intended, every jurisdiction within 100 miles needs to charge it too...




LOL, and what happens to the merchants on the fringe of the 100-mile radius? Do you extend the radius another 100 miles indefinitely to protect them?
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
33874 posts
Posted on 1/6/18 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

So if I set up on the street with a truck and sell drinks from the next county for a buck less,


It’s the same thing as “dry counties” in the South. All it does is inconvenience buyers and create boom towns right on the border for the counties that aren’t stupid enough to try and impose their morals through government bans
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33403 posts
Posted on 1/6/18 at 1:16 pm to
Just seems bizarre for them to say this. I would have thought the very point of the tax was to increase the price so people curtailed their consumption!
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 1/6/18 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

then your 2nd amendment. Government knows best! :)



well they have the right to regulate your firearms.. sorry?
Posted by Upperaltiger06
North Alabama
Member since Feb 2012
3946 posts
Posted on 1/6/18 at 3:15 pm to
Should get the money from the front and eliminate government subsidies to corn farmers. Then the market would correct the price for sugars created from corn.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47550 posts
Posted on 1/6/18 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

LOL, and what happens to the merchants on the fringe of the 100-mile radius? Do you extend the radius another 100 miles indefinitely to protect them?
you're not trying to regulate them. You're trying to regulate downtown Seattle.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73434 posts
Posted on 1/6/18 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

you're not trying to regulate them. You're trying to regulate downtown Seattle.
Except Daddy Starbucks.
Posted by JohnnyRebel
Colorado
Member since Sep 2014
7185 posts
Posted on 1/6/18 at 3:31 pm to
This has already happened in Boulder. One day last summer My entire grocery bill was up by like $20. The lady at the register was like, yea, it's your tea, soda, and Gatorade that spikes up the price because of the new sugar tax. Well I found my solution. I go to the next county over in Broomfield CO to grocery shop now. Liberals go over the top on a lot shite.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
35476 posts
Posted on 1/6/18 at 3:47 pm to
Seems like this same story played out in NYC or Philly last year. The city acted absolutely flabbergasted that retailers raised prices to cover the tax.

These guys are dumb but they knew this would happen. This is just CYA excuse making and unfortunately will probably work on their constituencies.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
One State Solution
Member since May 2012
55583 posts
Posted on 1/6/18 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

The tax is collected on the final distribution of sweetened beverages by a distributor. The tax is not collected by the retailer nor is the tax burden intended to fall onto the consumer."

oh, ok. that makes sense.
Posted by Capital Cajun
Over Yonder
Member since Aug 2007
5525 posts
Posted on 1/6/18 at 4:27 pm to
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73434 posts
Posted on 1/6/18 at 4:28 pm to
That's going to put a dent in the old EBT card.

I like how they advertise the fricking the voters are getting on the tag.
This post was edited on 1/6/18 at 4:34 pm
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32095 posts
Posted on 1/6/18 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

"The tax is collected on the final distribution of sweetened beverages by a distributor. The tax is not collected by the retailer nor is the tax burden intended to fall onto the consumer."


How do their voters still fall for this line of bullshite?

They accept any horrible piece of legislation so long as the democrats behind hit didn't intend to frick everything up.

When hve companies not turned the costs of business onto consumers?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram