re: SDNY fricking with DOGE ALSO

That last name. Hmmmm.

That’s literally not true. You looking at the Courts as being intrusive when their power is to examine if actions are abiding by the Law of the Land. If that power wasn’t there, we’d have a President that can do any and everything he wants. If DOGE can halt payments signed by Congress and people with no security clearance can access our systems (regardless of the extent of access), you are crazy if you don’t think there should be some review. I can guarantee these sentiments are not what they were when the Courts block Democratic EOs. The founding fathers did it like this for a reason

quote:

---

Then what’s the point of the Constitution or checks and balances? Some of you sound very un-American

---

Sounds like a really Marxist and anti American perspective.
Do you think this progressive judge cares about the Constitution??

Why not criticize his attempting to prevent consultants(directed by the sitting president) to extract data searching for fraud, waste, and corruption???

quote:

---

Sounds like a really Marxist and anti American perspective. Do you think this progressive judge cares about the Constitution?? Why not criticize his attempting to prevent consultants(directed by the sitting president) to extract data searching for fraud, waste, and corruption???

---

We can go back and forth about which political leaning judge xyz. The reality is that a foreigner (who get billions in fed money himself btw) and people without security clearance have this access. Yall don’t even know what Marxism is and use it when someone disagrees with you on actual American concepts. It’s literally in the Constitution for the courts to have this power. How’s something created by the creators of America…Marxist? LOL

quote:

---

This thing that POTUS is so different is mind boggling. He broke/breaks rules like every other one.

---

Name one

quote:

---

You dolt. It’s three equal branches of govt. trump doesn’t get to just steamroll past the constitution

---

Which action of Trumps, specifically,“steamrolls past the constitution?”

quote:

---

Name one

---

Well clearly the Administrative Procedures Act LOL

Why have a president then. Your argument is bullshite

quote:

---

He’s an American citizen.

---

With two other citizenships. It’s also amazing how the views on citizenship change here depending on who we are talking about. He’s still foreign born when interests in other countries such as China and is access our funding systems (that also pay him). Conflict of interest

quote:

---

people without security clearance have this access.

---

That logistically is incorrect. DOGE started on the day of inauguration (at earliest). Security clearance on the level needed to operate and examine the data of these departments takes longer than two weeks. That process is sometimes months long. Be serious bro… you’re falling for things that can easily be found. There are even local newspapers discussing it, since yall hate MSM so much. If they get said clearance, idc. That means that we’re vetted by our processes.

quote:

---

DOGE serves at the behest of the President within the executive branch. The judicial doesn’t get to limit the actions of the chief executive as it relates to the function of an executive staffer as long as they don’t violate the constitution or any federal laws.

---

DOGE serving “at the behest” of the President doesn’t mean that they can just jump through all these loops and be able to operate how they are much less go through these things then run to Twitter about them. If the Courts feel that there is a potential violation of a law or ruling that presents substantial argument, it is within their legal authority to contest it. Won’t be the first or last time they do it. Won’t be the first or last president to have it done to them.