- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SCOTUS trying to see middle of the road...
Posted on 6/30/26 at 2:56 pm
Posted on 6/30/26 at 2:56 pm
They give Trump/conservatives a win and then hand them a loss...give them a win, then hand them a loss.
Nothing to do with the Constitution...just trying seem impartial.
If they just followed the Constitution, liberals would be burning cities down.
Quite pathetic that they even take that into consideration.
Nothing to do with the Constitution...just trying seem impartial.
If they just followed the Constitution, liberals would be burning cities down.
Quite pathetic that they even take that into consideration.
This post was edited on 6/30/26 at 2:57 pm
5
Posted on 6/30/26 at 3:01 pm to JerseyTiger07
quote:
liberals would be burning cities down.
I'm more than a little disappointed that we don't have rulings that would make this happen, but they're pivoting to a long game solution it would seem.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 3:02 pm to JerseyTiger07
“Nothing to do with the Constitution...juat trying seem impartial.”
This is far from what I see when I review the opinions. For one thing, the justices vary a great deal with how they see the issues and clearly reflect deeply held beliefs about the constitution and jurisprudence. Which justices do you accuse of being in on the deal to fix results to seem impartial? Surely not Alito, Thomas, Sotomayor, Kagan, or Jackson. The truth is the results—which have often favored conservative positions—are arrived at by nine people who see things differently.
This is far from what I see when I review the opinions. For one thing, the justices vary a great deal with how they see the issues and clearly reflect deeply held beliefs about the constitution and jurisprudence. Which justices do you accuse of being in on the deal to fix results to seem impartial? Surely not Alito, Thomas, Sotomayor, Kagan, or Jackson. The truth is the results—which have often favored conservative positions—are arrived at by nine people who see things differently.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 3:07 pm to N.O. via West-Cal
Roberts and ACB
Roberts as far back as Obama care. He is worried about how the court will look.
I would also argue they side with liberals on more consequential cases. For example, today birthright citizenship was clearly the biggest.
Roberts as far back as Obama care. He is worried about how the court will look.
I would also argue they side with liberals on more consequential cases. For example, today birthright citizenship was clearly the biggest.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 3:31 pm to JerseyTiger07
quote:
They give Trump/conservatives a win and then hand them a loss...give them a win, then hand them a loss.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 3:53 pm to JerseyTiger07
I watched the biography of Sandra Day O’Conner, and they openly discuss her having this strategy. The biographers and historians, of course, act like that was some sort of brilliant and nuanced approach. To me Gorsuch has been a very good SC justice. There have been a few cases I didn’t like his decision, but once he explains how he arrived there you have to give him credit.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 3:55 pm to JerseyTiger07
They don’t want to court packed so they are riding the fence.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News