- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS ruling disproves Democrats’ claims that the high court is in Trump’s pocket.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 11:41 am to Timeoday
Posted on 2/21/26 at 11:41 am to Timeoday
The USSC is a joke at this time.
On any given case, you can absolutely with 100% accuracy guess which way at least 2 of the 3 leftist justices will vote based purely on political activism.
If it’s a case that will help Trump and is controversial, Robert’s will side with the leftists.
It’s all so tiresome.
On any given case, you can absolutely with 100% accuracy guess which way at least 2 of the 3 leftist justices will vote based purely on political activism.
If it’s a case that will help Trump and is controversial, Robert’s will side with the leftists.
It’s all so tiresome.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 11:43 am to Timeoday
That court is still very liberal.
You have Sotomayor, Jackson, Roberts, Kagen and in a lot of cases either Kavanaugh or ACB that will side with the swamp/globalists.
Trump needs 3 more appointments before he leaves office.
You have Sotomayor, Jackson, Roberts, Kagen and in a lot of cases either Kavanaugh or ACB that will side with the swamp/globalists.
Trump needs 3 more appointments before he leaves office.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 11:47 am to VOR
quote:
The Court remains unbalanced. Roberts is the only conservative with the balls to rule against Trump. Alito and Thomas are shameless hacks whose pockets are lined(either in cash or "in kind") by the corrupt Right
Your hook is too shiny.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 12:02 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
If it’s a case that will help Trump and is controversial, Robert’s will side with the leftists.
POTUS Trump and America was certainly helped yesterday, no doubt about it. POTUS Trump was irritated only because he has to spend a little bit of his extremely valuable time making SCOTUS clarified changes to his tariff program.
Cha-ching cha-ching!!
Posted on 2/21/26 at 12:31 pm to Big4SALTbro
quote:
Actually I feel worse because one of the things people have always said was the court is conservative
Actually this is another data point that the court is actually conservative and interpreting the Constitution correctly. I agree with the overall premise of OP on this one.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 1:31 pm to Timeoday
Trump didn't get the outcome he was hoping for from the Supreme Court. He didn't like the decision, and made some pretty rough comments about the justices who let him down. But, there was no talk of "packing the court" like the Democrats usually respond when they don't get their way.
These days, it really is a battle between good and bad in our country. The Dems represent everything bad!
These days, it really is a battle between good and bad in our country. The Dems represent everything bad!
Posted on 2/21/26 at 1:47 pm to VOR
quote:
The Court remains unbalanced. Roberts is the only conservative with the balls to rule against Trump. Alito and Thomas are shameless hacks whose pockets are lined(either in cash or "in kind") by the corrupt Right
We need more conservatives on it. Leftists believe in some crazy arse nonsense. The less of them, the better out nations future.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 1:57 pm to Timeoday
Well yeah but only for the weekend.
The modern Democratic establishment has forfeited any serious claim to credibility or moral consistency. Their positions appear less rooted in principle than in political expediency, with outrage deployed selectively and silence maintained when acknowledgment proves inconvenient. They will marshal vast resources for performative unrest when it serves their narrative, yet conspicuously ignore or suppress comparable, or even more egregious, incidents when those events undermine their preferred framing. Such selective indignation is not leadership its opportunism masquerading as virtue.
The modern Democratic establishment has forfeited any serious claim to credibility or moral consistency. Their positions appear less rooted in principle than in political expediency, with outrage deployed selectively and silence maintained when acknowledgment proves inconvenient. They will marshal vast resources for performative unrest when it serves their narrative, yet conspicuously ignore or suppress comparable, or even more egregious, incidents when those events undermine their preferred framing. Such selective indignation is not leadership its opportunism masquerading as virtue.
This post was edited on 2/21/26 at 1:59 pm
Popular
Back to top

1







