- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS rules against Muslim in religious equality case
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:02 am to Sentrius
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:02 am to Sentrius
quote:
I wold've ruled in favor of the muzzie here.
Religious freedom guaranteed by the first amendment is religious freedom guaranteed by the first amendment.
They should've allowed an imam there.
Criminal conviction is manifested by suspension of many rights guaranteed by the constitution and its amendments.
0
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:03 am to 337Tiger19
quote:
Could we imagine the roles being reversed?
Yeah, seeing as this recent Moslem convert was convicted and sentenced to death over 20 years ago, and waited 10 days prior to execution to raise this issue, I can see how the court considered it a BS appeal.
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:09 am to 337Tiger19
I suspect there is more here for the SC to have gotten involved and that the.article cited deliberately excluded that more. In general though I'm not.that concerned about what happens to people eho have no business being here.
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:10 am to autauga
quote:
He killed three kids. I don't care about his feelings.
The gonna be dead part still stands.
It’s about the afterlife and dignity in dying. A murderer who requests a priest or rabbi at his execution gets one, but a Muslim can’t have a spiritual leader present? I don’t know about this. Just seems wrong. What’s right for one is right for all. This means they could deny a Christian the comfort of a priest. Don’t like it.
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:11 am to TBoy
quote:
It’s about the afterlife and dignity in dying. A murderer who requests a priest or rabbi at his execution gets one, but a Muslim can’t have a spiritual leader present? I don’t know about this. Just seems wrong. What’s right for one is right for all. This means they could deny a Christian the comfort of a priest. Don’t like it.
You need to go back and read the rest of the thread.
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:13 am to 337Tiger19
Ha.
frick that guy.
frick that guy.
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:13 am to TBoy
quote:
It’s about the afterlife and dignity in dying. A murderer who requests a priest or rabbi at his execution gets one, but a Muslim can’t have a spiritual leader present? I don’t know about this. Just seems wrong. What’s right for one is right for all. This means they could deny a Christian the comfort of a priest. Don’t like it.
You should probably read the opinion and not just some shitty partisan article with a clickbait headline.
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:14 am to Sentrius
You didn't have the facts of this case when you posted this, did you?
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:16 am to Sentrius
quote:
So they'd rather deny christian inmates their own pastor/preist to look fair denying the muzzie his imam than to let the muzzie have his imam there in his very last moments?
Not really that simple. The policy allowed only Chaplains employed by the ADOC in the execution chamber. Employed is the key word here and if you really thought about it, it would be reasonable to expect anyone allowed into that room to be an employee of the State for obvious reasons...
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:19 am to 337Tiger19
sounds like a ploy to delay the grim reaper
This post was edited on 2/8/19 at 7:20 am
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:21 am to TBoy
quote:
It’s about the afterlife and dignity in dying.
This piece of shite is owed nothing.
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:25 am to 337Tiger19
Don't care
He killed children.
He killed children.
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:27 am to 337Tiger19
He gone
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:28 am to TBoy
quote:
A murderer who requests a priest or rabbi at his execution gets one, but a Muslim can’t have a spiritual leader present?
Yeah, shows you don't know shite... Only Chaplains employed by ADOC were allowed into the actual execution chamber... He got his spiritual advisor up to the point he was wheeled into the execution chamber...
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:33 am to TBoy
Well, I auppoae they couls have hung him on the town square and let an Imam and whoever else wanted to watch be there. Maybe public execution with a reading of the conviction is the way to go.
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:39 am to Sentrius
frick the Muslim
So glad we got kavanaugh in there
So glad we got kavanaugh in there
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:41 am to Sentrius
quote:
So they'd rather deny christian inmates their own pastor/preist to look fair denying the muzzie his imam than to let the muzzie have his imam there in his very last moments?
Meh, I'd rather just as soon see the goat frickers banned from this country all together. They're a drain on Western Civilization.
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:41 am to 337Tiger19
Why can't this guy have his imam when another guy can have a pastor and another guy a rabbi?
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:45 am to Clames
So shite stirrer conveniently left out ALL this in his post. How convenient of him.
Posted on 2/8/19 at 7:46 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
Why can't this guy have his imam when another guy can have a pastor and another guy a rabbi?
You'd know the answer to this if you bothered actually reading the court's opinion and not just a headline from a biased news paper.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News