- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SCOTUS Rejects Carter Page’s Last-Ditch Effort to Hold James Comey Accountable
Posted on 6/16/26 at 10:55 am
Posted on 6/16/26 at 10:55 am
SUPREME COURT Rejects Carter Page’s Last-Ditch Effort to Hold James Comey and His FBI Cronies Accountable for Russia Hoax FISA Surveillance Abuse
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/supreme-court-rejects-carter-pages-last-ditch-effort/
https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/2019-12/12.11.19.pdf
quote:
As The Gateway Pundit has reported extensively since the earliest days of the Russia hoax, Carter Page was never charged with a single crime. Not one.
Yet the FBI, under Comey’s leadership, obtained repeated FISA warrants to spy on him by feeding the secret court a stream of uncorroborated opposition research paid for by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the DNC through Perkins Coie and Fusion GPS.
The 2019 Department of Justice Inspector General report by Michael Horowitz laid it bare: 17 significant errors and omissions in the FISA applications targeting Page.
The FBI deliberately hid from the FISA Court the fact that Page had previously cooperated with the CIA on Russian matters, explosive exculpatory information that destroyed their entire premise.
In April, the Trump Justice Department finally did the right thing and settled Page’s claims against the federal government for $1.25 million.
A DOJ spokesman was blunt: “No American should ever face covert and unlawful surveillance based on their political view,” adding that the investigation relied on “inherently flawed and uncorroborated information, proving it was a political sham from the get-go.”
But the claims against the individual bad actors, Comey and his FBI cronies, were dismissed by a federal judge on statute of limitations grounds.
Lower courts ruled Page waited too long to sue (he filed in 2020, arguing the clock should start from when the full extent of the abuses became clear via the IG report).
The D.C. Circuit upheld that ruling. And now the Supreme Court has refused to even hear the case.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/supreme-court-rejects-carter-pages-last-ditch-effort/
https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/2019-12/12.11.19.pdf
Posted on 6/16/26 at 11:25 am to Ailsa
Statute of Limitations in my mind is and always has been bullshite to enable these crooks to do exactly what theyve done here. Get away with crimes.
I dont care how far back you committed a crime. You did it you pay for it,
I dont care how far back you committed a crime. You did it you pay for it,
Posted on 6/16/26 at 11:29 am to antibarner
Agreed. Especially in a situation like this
Posted on 6/16/26 at 11:29 am to antibarner
quote:
Statute of Limitations in my mind is and always has been bullshite to enable these crooks to do exactly what theyve done here. Get away with crimes.
I dont care how far back you committed a crime. You did it you pay for it,
Is there a statute of limitations regarding treason?
AI Overview
There is no statute of limitations on treason, meaning an individual can be tried and punished for the crime at any point, regardless of how much time has passed.
Capital Offense: Under 18 U.S. Code § 2381, treason is punishable by death. Federal law dictates that any crime punishable by death—such as capital murder, espionage, and treason—has no statute of limitations
Consensus on Prosecution: Legal scholars and the Department of Justice agree that because of the extreme severity of the crime, there is no time limit for prosecuting treason.
Evidentiary Standard: While there is no time limit for prosecution, the U.S. Constitution (Article III, Section 3) makes conviction notoriously difficult. A conviction requires either a confession in open court or the direct testimony of two witnesses to the exact same overt act.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 11:33 am to Ailsa
quote:
Is there a statute of limitations regarding treason?

Posted on 6/16/26 at 11:39 am to Catahoula20LSU
quote:
Agreed. Especially in a situation like this
One where the guilty have used their political clout, power, connections and cover from the swamp to drag 'disclosure' and run the clock out.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 11:43 am to Ailsa
quote:
But the claims against the individual bad actors, Comey and his FBI cronies, were dismissed by a federal judge on statute of limitations grounds.
Lower courts ruled Page waited too long to sue (he filed in 2020, arguing the clock should start from when the full extent of the abuses became clear via the IG report).
"You didn't know about it, but you should have sued when it happened."
That is a stupid standard.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 11:45 am to Ailsa
quote:
SUPREME COURT Rejects Carter Page’s Last-Ditch Effort to Hold James Comey and His FBI Cronies Accountable for Russia Hoax FISA Surveillance Abuse
The Swamp protects it's own
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:07 pm to imjustafatkid
No doubt about it. How can one know when when one doesn't know when.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:10 pm to antibarner
Agreed….a serial killer identified 30 years later through DNA is punished….what’s the difference?
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:41 pm to antibarner
“Statute of Limitations in my mind is and always has been bullshite to enable these crooks to do exactly what theyve done here. Get away with crimes.”
I can understand why you feel that way, but I strongly disagree. The ability to defend claims can diminish greatly with the passage of time. Look at the absurd verdict against Trump in the civil matter in NY. Under any traditional S/L, that case never sees the light of day. S/L are imperfect but necessary to prevent abuse.
I can understand why you feel that way, but I strongly disagree. The ability to defend claims can diminish greatly with the passage of time. Look at the absurd verdict against Trump in the civil matter in NY. Under any traditional S/L, that case never sees the light of day. S/L are imperfect but necessary to prevent abuse.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:42 pm to First Sergeant1
Agreed….a serial killer identified 30 years later through DNA is punished….what’s the difference?
No S/L for murder.
No S/L for murder.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:43 pm to N.O. via West-Cal
quote:
. The ability to defend claims can diminish greatly with the passage of time.
There is no statute of limitations on treason
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:44 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
"You didn't know about it, but you should have sued when it happened."
Except the ruling, included the relevant part of the post you quoted, states that the time started running when the IG report revealed the information.
Statutes of limitations/prescriptive periods (LA state equivalent) are foundational in both criminal and civil law.
They are also very easy issues to avoid. Having a case tossed on those grounds is a user error--not an issue with the court systems.
This post was edited on 6/16/26 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:47 pm to Ailsa
quote:
Is there a statute of limitations regarding treason?
In what way is that applicable to this case/discussion?
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:47 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Except the ruling, included the relevant part of the post you quoted, states that the time started running when the IG report revealed the information.
Correct. He failed as usual by mis-stating facts.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:53 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Except the ruling, included the relevant part of the post you quoted, states that the time started running when the IG report revealed the information.
Statutes of limitations/prescriptive periods (LA state equivalent) are foundational in both criminal and civil law.
They are also very easy issues to avoid. Having a case tossed on those grounds is a user error--not an issue with the court systems.
If this is true, then the statute of limitations is too limited. The IG report was issued in 2019, and he filed his suit in 2020.
I suspect that is not actually the statute of limitations, and my original post is correct. That's pretty typical though. I'm usually correct.
This post was edited on 6/16/26 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 6/16/26 at 12:54 pm to Ailsa
Comey
Fauci
Omar
Walz
Newsom
The list goes on and on, and we’re seeing that not one damned thing is going to happen to any of them.
Fauci
Omar
Walz
Newsom
The list goes on and on, and we’re seeing that not one damned thing is going to happen to any of them.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 1:05 pm to High C
quote:
The list goes on and on, and we’re seeing that not one damned thing is going to happen to any of them.
Everything must be done by the book and exposed before an avalanche of prosecutions happens.
Posted on 6/16/26 at 1:10 pm to Ailsa
If there’s any outfit that’s been shown to do things by the book, it’s been this iteration of the DOJ
Popular
Back to top


4










