Started By
Message

re: Scalise, Supremacist Conv., David Duke, Stormfront.com... has all the characters

Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:48 am to
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
83369 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:48 am to
quote:

Scalise is associated with David dukes group and he didn't turn away from them.

Unlike farakhan and wright, duke is seriously deranged. He went to a holocaust deniers conference with ahmadinejad.


6/10
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:50 am to
quote:

youre a hypocrite because you are not also giving the same benefit of the doubt to other pieces of shite.

they may be racist, but its ok, because they're your racists. being racist isn't the kiss of death for them like your adversaries.

What the hell are you talking about? Did you not read my earlier post in which I defended Scalise? Let me say it again, this is much ado about nothing.
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Why when I google search all these quotes no real news outlet shows up not even Fox News shows anything for these quotes. And Fox News is pretty thorough with getting dirt on the president.

Many of the quotes are on clips on youtube. Search "Jeremiah Wright".
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
450812 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Scalise is/was an easy candidate for Vitter's seat when it comes open. This kills his nascent candidacy in the crib.

opens teh door for my man boustany
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Two words for you fatass

Fatass?!? Thanks! I've had a white guy's no arse my whole life and have done squats to get an arse. Thanks for noticing my hard work!

quote:

Robert Byrd

That's not two words. That's a dead guy's name.
Posted by OleWar
Troy H. Middleton Library
Member since Mar 2008
5828 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:54 am to
quote:

no, I'm not. I'm old enough to remember the duke mentality


You however act as if the popularity of Duke occurred in a vacuum or he was a legacy Southern White Supremacist like Wallace. Duke was a mainstream white reaction to the failures of liberal urban policies which had turned the major cities in Louisiana into crime ridden/economic disasters. Louisiana as a whole compared to other southern states had been an incredibly tolerant place and its legacy politicians had reflected that whether Long or Edwards. Of course a lot of Louisiana Republicans despised Duke, but when he became the most powerful Republican in the state, the party had to take notice. Did Duke not show up at Republican Party meetings give speeches garner applause and raise money?
Congratulations to you and your father for being so progressive and enlightened in the 1990s, but don't act like the rise of Duke was solely based on racism in Louisiana.
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
32320 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Truth be told from a economical stand point if you are not in that oh so glorious 1% you should not be support the GOP. All those who are in the GOP and not in the 1% are just pawns doing there bidding. 
The stupidity of this statement is staggering.

So I as an upper middle class voter should support a party who wants to raise my taxes at every turn, force me to buy more expensive healthcare with less benefits, take away my Second Ammendment rights, and wants open borders?

Are you fricking retarded?
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
84710 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:55 am to
quote:

Unlike farakhan and wright, duke is seriously deranged.




Yeah. Farrakhan and Wright aren't deranged.

I think YOU'RE deranged.
Posted by EthanL
Auburn,AL
Member since Oct 2011
6963 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:55 am to
Certainly Jeremiah Wright has some prejudicial, hateful, and inflammatory filth that spews from his mouth. Some of it is based on something, maybe his own experiences, who knows. He is definitely a divisive, angry person.

David Duke is not a divisive, angry person. He doesn't rely on hateful rhetoric or anger-laced speeches to stir his base. In a calm and subtle manner he is able to push a simple narrative to those who are willing to listen: That Whites are inherently superior to blacks, and that blacks are inherently inferior.

This is at the pinnacle in defining racism, the inherent belief that your race is superior, and has abilities that exceed that of the other race.

Im sure they are out there, but you would be hard pressed to find many so-called black leaders and politicians discussing and espousing the belief that blacks are superior to whites in almost every way.

OTOH, it is not uncommon to find a white politician who 'speaks off the cuff' about ethnic differences and why they are so. You can't blame them really. At least such comments have a basis for believing it. There was a time when slavery, and not too recently, segregation said just that.

So to call Jeremiah Wright a racist, when you compare him to David Duke is laughable
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:56 am to
quote:

wright may not be a "racist",

This noted black minister thinks so:
LINK

quote:

i don't think he's a good counterpoint to duke, though.

Only because of the slanted way that our society views the issue. If you took Wrights words and positions and switched "black" with "white" it would be considered incredibly flagrant racism.
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:56 am to
I certainly hope you're right and he doesn't lose his post. That will show the leaders of the GOP hasn't changed at all and doesn't care about the perception it's a white man's party. Please keep him.
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:58 am to
quote:

I'm speaking the truth and you can't handle it, there's no hypocrisy here. Franklin Graham is also a racist, but like Farrakhan, he has some redeeming qualities.


Racists that support your position have redeeming qualities.

Racists that don't, don't.

Posted by redandright
Member since Jun 2011
9770 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:59 am to
There's no comparison. You're comparing one speech to decades of exploitation of racial grievances, anger and resentment.

One speech. Is there a pattern of racism in Scalise's votes or other actions.

Even the lone La Democrat in Congress an African American, Cedric Richmond, said that he and Scalise have worked for years together and that Scalise has not one racist bone in his body.

So I'm taking all the things Scalise has done over the years, and putting it up against one speech, and I'm supposed to conclude that he's some sort of White Supremacist?

BTW I voted for Edwin Edwards when he ran against David Duke. The only time in my life I've ever voted for him.

And the GOP better not let the DNC or the media force out Scalise. They've turned a blind eye for decades towards the exploits and sins of the Left. Much worse things than giving one speech.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
107300 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 9:59 am to
quote:

Racists that support your position have redeeming qualities.

Racists that don't, don't.


Duke really doesn't.

He wasn't actually at this thing, though, was he?
This post was edited on 12/30/14 at 10:00 am
Posted by Sal Minella
Member since Nov 2006
1951 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Unlike farakhan and wright, duke is seriously deranged.


Farrakhan and the Islamic UFO of Death


quote:

duke is seriously deranged. He went to a holocaust deniers conference with ahmadinejad


"The Jews don't like Farrakhan, so they call me Hitler. Well, that's a good name. Hitler was a very great man."
- Louis Farrakhan


ETA and FTR: Duke isn't deranged, he's just an old school white trash racist who is of no social or political consequence in 2014 America. Doesn't he live in Europe these days?
This post was edited on 12/30/14 at 10:05 am
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
84710 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:00 am to
quote:

I certainly hope you're right and he doesn't lose his post. That will show the leaders of the GOP hasn't changed at all and doesn't care about the perception it's a white man's party.


Actually, what it will show, is that the furor over a speech about tax policy made 12 years ago is much ado about nothing.
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Scalise is associated with David dukes group and he didn't turn away from them.

He was never associated with them, you fricking lying idiot.

quote:

Unlike farakhan and wright, duke is seriously deranged. He went to a holocaust deniers conference with ahmadinejad.

Have you even read Farrakhan's statements on violence and hate?

You are a fricking imbecile.

quote:

No way will scalise survive this. There's too much crazy for him to contain.

I can't tell if I love this shite or hate it, but it's entertaining.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
30647 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:03 am to
quote:

Representative Scalise brought into sharp focus the dire circumstances pervasive in many important, under-funded needs of the community at the expense of graft within the Housing and Urban Development Fund, an apparent give-away to a selective group based on race."

I mean, is any part of this not true?
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
83369 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:04 am to
Truth is no defense to allegations of political incorrectness
Posted by LSU_Saints_Hornets
Uptown NO,LA
Member since Jan 2013
9739 posts
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:04 am to
quote:

The stupidity of this statement is staggering.


quote:

So I as an upper middle class voter should support a party who wants to raise my taxes at every turn,


The GOP is agaianst raising taxes?



Facts state otherwise you dumb frick
quote:

These two differences reflect the important fact that the philosophy behind the cuts differs dramatically even though both presidents signed big tax cuts into law. While President Bush’s tax cuts primarily benefited the wealthy, President Obama’s tax cuts focus on the middle class. While President Bush believed tax cuts were the cure-all elixir for whatever ailed the economy—a belief that was far-fetched even at the time—President Obama uses targeted breaks to businesses and consumers in a time of profound economic weakness designed to spark job creation. And while President Bush was entirely unconcerned about the long-term costs of tax cuts and the resulting debt pile-up, President Obama has consistently made the case for more revenue, especially from those who can most afford it, to help close the budget gap.


Please take a moment and educate yourself.

quote:

force me to buy more expensive healthcare with less benefits, take away my Second Ammendment rights, and wants open borders?

Are you fricking retarded?


Stay on topic. The ability not being able lends to the assumption that you many be retarded.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram