Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Sam Harris comment on media and election broken down by Scott Adams

Posted on 8/19/22 at 9:48 am
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67767 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 9:48 am
Scott Adams podcast (rumble) go to 30:35

Synopsis: it's not Sam Harris, it's the fake news that is the problem.
Posted by UnrealEngine
Coral Gables
Member since Aug 2022
63 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 9:53 am to
Harris admits he wasnt very clear, tried to explain on twitter...

quote:

There is a podcast clip circulating that seems to be confusing many people about my views on Trump (which is understandable because I wasn’t speaking very clearly). So, for what it’s worth, here is what I was trying to say: 1/6
quote:

I was essentially arguing for a principle of self-defense (where there’s a continuum of proportionate force that is appropriate and necessary to use). I’ve always viewed Trump as a very dangerous person to elect as president of a fake university, 2/6
quote:

let alone the US, and when he became a sitting president who would not commit to a peaceful transfer of power, I viewed him as more dangerous still. (However, I’ve never been under any illusion that he is Orange Hitler.) 3/6
quote:

On the podcast, I was speaking narrowly about the wisdom and propriety of ignoring the Hunter Biden laptop story until after the election. I’ve always thought that this was a very hard call, ethically and journalistically. 4/6
quote:

But given what happened with the Anthony Weiner laptop in the previous election, I think it was probably the right call. 5/6
quote:

Nothing I said on that podcast was meant to suggest that the Democrats would have been right to commit election fraud or take other illegal measures to deny Trump the presidency (nor do I think they did that). 6/6
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21731 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Harris admits he wasnt very clear, tried to explain on twitter...


"I was too honest for a second; don't pay attention to what I said."
Posted by Ancient Astronaut
Member since May 2015
33040 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 9:56 am to
Does this guy believe himself?
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Harris admits he wasnt very clear


The one thing Harris is known for is clarity of thought and speech. He was crystal clear.

This is his attempt at finessing his first comments, and all it did was make it worse.

Truth is, Sam gave into his TDS years ago.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21731 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 9:59 am to
quote:

Synopsis: it's not Sam Harris, it's the fake news that is the problem.


Then Adams is wrong, because they're both problems. This "by any means necessary because Orange Man Bad" has already led to some pretty evil shite and Harris is saying "yeah but it's worth it".
Posted by LSUnation78
Northshore
Member since Aug 2012
12065 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 10:13 am to
I dont care how he explains it.

Sam Harris is too fricking smart to get a pass on thinking hunter biden laptop should have been shelved.


By his logic it should be investigsted by now. And its not. Why is that, Sam? You smarmy dip shite.
Posted by UnrealEngine
Coral Gables
Member since Aug 2022
63 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 10:16 am to
quote:

This is his attempt at finessing his first comments, and all it did was make it worse.

Truth is, Sam gave into his TDS years ago.
yeah, maybe, I dont know, Im no Sam Harris expert, just pointing out the update
Posted by Bwmdx
Member since Dec 2018
2753 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 10:20 am to
The ends justify the means. This is the Democratic mantra.
Posted by VolcanicTiger
Member since Apr 2022
5933 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Then Adams is wrong, because they're both problems.
I really like Scott Adams, but there are at least three people I will never trust his opinion on, as his bias is too deep for whatever reason:
1. Rear Admiral Pete Booty-jig
2. Bill Gates
3. Sam Harris
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28858 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 10:25 am to
quote:

This is his attempt at finessing his first comments, and all it did was make it worse.




his "clarification" made it worse to be honest. i've never been a huge fan of him compared to others on the IDW, but he cemented himself in favor of dishonesty for the sake of his own considered gain.

No matter how bad Trump was in his mind, making sure bad news about the other candidate doesn't come to light is just dishonesty and cheating by another name.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21546 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 10:29 am to
quote:

"I was too honest for a second; don't pay attention to what I said."


He sounds like he's doubling down. It's a tough journalistic call to spike a huge political story because it might influence voters to vote in a way you don't like? I'm not sure he's walked anything back, it sounds like he's just added more polish.
Posted by Paddyshack
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2015
8218 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 10:38 am to
quote:

I’ve always thought that this was a very hard call, ethically

He doesn't have any ethics. He is a Machiavellian piece of human trash.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
12549 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 10:45 am to
quote:

On the podcast, I was speaking narrowly about the wisdom and propriety of ignoring the Hunter Biden laptop story until after the election. I’ve always thought that this was a very hard call, ethically and journalistically.



Ethically and journalistically.

We are taking about the same people who have not apologized a single time for “Russian collusion”, giving the Steele Dossier a minute’s coverage, going ballistic about an accusation of quid pro quo when Biden is actually on tape admitting it?

That kind of ethics and journalistic integrity??

quote:


4/6 quote: But given what happened with the Anthony Weiner laptop in the previous election, I think it was probably the right call. 5/6


So the Weiner laptop exposed the SOS breaking the law and it reflected on her.

And the Hunter Biden laptop outlines how Biden was getting “10% to the big guy”, Hunter traveling with his father and somehow coming back with lucrative business dealings, proved Biden lied about not knowing associates of Hunter Biden, and all of which points to personal gain in political office.

Two separate crimes.

Oh but it cost them the first time…. Got to bury the second time. More ethical and journalistic integrity there. Must convince the pure idiots that the US almost fell on 01/06/2020. Just NOT at all to blame a main antagonist on video that has somehow escaped all scrutiny.. and is even getting sympathy from the media. More ethics and journalistic integrity.
This post was edited on 8/19/22 at 10:48 am
Posted by HabaneroBuck
Up a ways.
Member since Oct 2020
1359 posts
Posted on 8/19/22 at 10:56 am to
quote:

This is his attempt at finessing his first comments, and all it did was make it worse.


He comes off as an intellectual lightweight, as well. Using a phrase like "infinitesimally small" is sophomoric fodder. He actually said that any corruption concerning Joe Biden (acknowledging the likely veracity of Ukraine and China kicking back money through Hunter) is infinitesimally small compared to Trump University! Besides being profoundly inaccurate in his use of language, it's not even a valid point to make! Foreign agents buying influence through corrupt deals isn't that big of a deal?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram