- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics

UnrealEngine
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | Coral Gables |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 63 |
| Registered on: | 8/19/2022 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: LSU womens soccer - woke……
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/22/22 at 9:54 am to compscitiger
1. you had to google it? why?
2. its not accurate anyway, thats not what "woke" means, he's just taking what Fox told you CRT was and using that again.
2. its not accurate anyway, thats not what "woke" means, he's just taking what Fox told you CRT was and using that again.
re: LSU womens soccer - woke……
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/22/22 at 9:45 am to VolcanicTiger
quote:Im'a swagger right back out too considering no one has been able to define "woke".
lol What a set of balls on you, to swagger in here like you're an expert in something and are suited to do more than shine my shoes!
quote:I notice you talk about gay sex a lot. that and sex with kids. like, A LOT a lot, enough that it stands out, even in the short time Ive been here. its like you never stop thinking about gay sex. like you just had another post that said...
No wonder your daddy took all those pictures of you and sold them to his friends.
"We should get a poll for a lot of you here to find out what flavor boot polish you like, or if you just prefer to take it anally."
its stuff like that, it'll start out normal then veer off as you daydream about guys taking things up the arse.
another post was about guys giving handjobs to one another. and glory holes around DC. and molesting underage nephews. and asking a guy about his boyfriend. sucking dick is just on you mind A LOT.
You're one of those "just because I sucked another guy's dick doesn't mean I'm gay" guys, aren't you?
and then there's whatever the hell this is...
He thinks he's cute but broken, like Beta would have dated him in high school, and he would heal Beta's brokenness, and they could have moved to Vermont and worn matching turtlenecks and adopted an African baby (but not too dark). He has his own fantasy that mirrors "Somewhere That's Green".
you alright there, dude? you got some feelings your trying to squash down? because heterosexual males dont think about gay sex this often, they just dont, its not a topic that spontaneously comes up over and over and over.
re: a president's discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/22/22 at 8:49 am to PsychTiger
quote:A for effort. at least you put some thought into your insult, I appreciate that.
Yes you are, a mental patient.
re: a president's discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/22/22 at 8:46 am to Padme
quote:my first hint was when the FBI had to raid his house to get back the files he stole. if everything was by the book Im gonna guess they wouldn't have done that.
So I’m trying to understand your argument. You’re saying Trump’s biggest error was that he didn’t follow proper procedure?
And how exactly in the fuk do you know?
but, and apparently I need to say this for the third time, "none of the criminal provisions listed in the search warrant hinge on whether the documents recovered at MAL were classified or not, so it doesnt even matter, he's fricked regardless."
re: a president's discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/22/22 at 8:39 am to Dock Holiday
quote:its possible in the sense that its not impossible, of course. but that would mean he was all of sudden beholden to convention and some stickler for government rules, and we both know he's anything but that.
It's very possible Trump was well within his rights to possess everything that was at MAL, you know this.
re: Ivy League Lawyers = Communist scum..."NYT, Throw out the Constitution"...
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/22/22 at 8:18 am to oogabooga68
quote:fricking. what? what on earth are you talking about? do you think theres something in the Constitution about murder?
I guess these idiots don't understand that the Constitution protects Commie scum like them from Patriots like us....
and yes, we should throw out the Constitution, you know as well as I do that this is not working, our system of government is shite, we hate one another, we're not even 250 yet and we're tearing apart at the seems. what we have now makes us loyal to states, not the country, that was never gonna work, we're not a united people.
when the constitution was written 96 percent of the US lived in rural areas and on farms. today it's 14 percent. that shite doesnt work with the country we have now.
re: a president's discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/22/22 at 7:54 am to Bard
quote:dude. come on. Narbona even says, in that same post, that "This doesn't clarify whether the boxes taken by the FBI were the same documents he declassified before leaving office".
Except for the actual evidence posted in the post right above yours, you mean.
I greatly appreciate the intellectual honesty there, btw, because yeah, I assume trump did at some point declassify something correctly. that doesnt mean it happened here.
re: LSU womens soccer - woke……
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/22/22 at 7:50 am to TJG210
I dare any of you to actually define "woke". Be specific. Dont tell me what its like, tell me what it is.
re: a president's discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/22/22 at 7:46 am to GumboPot
quote:oh shite dude, you got me this time, Im on the ropes now, no way I talk my way out of this one. My hubris has betrayed me again, because if theres one thing I refuse to do its say the President has unqualified power to declassify things. except on page 1 of this 2 page thread, when that was the very first thing I said.
What is this declassification process by the chief executive and by what authority?
Specifically lay it out. Is it different for different presidents? Has it evolved over time?
Of course you will never lay it out because you know an I know the chief executive has plenary power to classify and declassify.
You and the media will never define the process because you'd rather keep it ambiguous so you can just make up shite to get Trump.
"right. yes. the president can declassify whatever he wants, that is correct. there is no one on the other side of that argument. youre not refuting anything."
thats me, genius. try harder.
re: a president's discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/22/22 at 3:35 am to BoarEd
quote:you understand that Top Secret docs are sealed in locked pouches, right, and they have super colorful cover sheets filled with all kinds of warnings, they dont print the secret info on the cover, you get that, right? the agents are allowed to see the pouch.
Either the documents were classified and those agents didn't have clearance to view the documents
or in your scenario did trump mishandle classified docs so severely that he just sorta had them hanging around his tacky arse budget "resort"?
quote:zero actual evidence of that.
or they were declassified as we know they are
quote:I said this part once but I can say it again, none of the criminal provisions listed in the search warrant hinge on whether the documents recovered at MAL were classified or not, so it doesnt even matter, he's fricked regardless.
and they just stepped in an enormous pile of shite.
re: a president's discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/22/22 at 3:26 am to Jimbeaux
quote:not ignoring that at all, hell Im glad you mentioned it, because thats the other problem, he denied having any Top Secret or SCI documents, and the FBI knew he was lying, they removed three boxes full of them.
You are ignoring the fact that Trump met with the investigators at MAL months ago and allowed them access to the documents.
THATS what someone inside his little circle tipped the FBI off too, thats why the urgency.
re: a president's discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/22/22 at 3:22 am to BoarEd
quote:we'll see. Im patient.
You have no business talking about reality. You're entirely detached from it.
re: a president's discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/22/22 at 3:17 am to BoarEd
quote:in no way did I contradict myself. by all means point it out if Im mistaken.
The rest of your post contradicts your first paragraph. Spoken like an Orwellian totalitarian. Double speak.
quote:ok, well, lets see, he was impeached twice, bounced out of the White House after one term by someone who'd never even won a primary before, he's ostracized in his beloved home town of NYC and instead has to live surrounded by people he loathes, and now there is a shockingly good chance he actually gets arrested.
Keep wishing. One of these days you guys might get him. But it won't be this time. Sucks to suck.
what did you think "we got him" would look like, because in reality it looks a lot like this.
re: a president's discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/22/22 at 2:59 am to Strannix
quote:hahaha, spare me your tough guy theatrics, Im not impressed, you sound ridiculous.
why dont you worry about retard Joe destroying the country before our eyes you piece of shite.
quote:ok, cool, no major party candidate has ever lost the popular vote three times in a row, he would set an unbreakable record.
guess what podnuh, he's coming back.
re: Watching the trial of the machines aka Election Fraud 2020 receipts
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/22/22 at 2:55 am to PollyDawg
quote:yeah, dude, all names are made up, and Im aware this is not the official one. shockingly, you knew what I was referring to, didnt you?
Also, the "don't say gay bill" was a made up name. Dems do that a lot because they believe you only read headlines and listen to talking points
FTR, the reason its called "dont say gay" is because thats whats in the bill, in crystal clear language, Florida schools cant acknowledge the existence of gay people anymore, no talking points needed.
quote:oh my god, you people will shoe horn those riots into anything wont you. arent you embarrassed to say shite this dumb, it doesnt bother you at all?
Did they storm city streets for months, burning and destroying property that didn't belong to them?
quote:why are you stopping, keep going, dont stop at 2, I listed 18 things in a flash, if you want to play this "both sides do it equally" shite you have 16 more to go.
Didn't they boycott Chick-fil-A and Goya and...er, never mind.
re: a president's discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/22/22 at 2:51 am to Strannix
quote:good luck arguing that the federal government is just supposed to read trumps mind and adjust accordingly.
The mere act or him removing a document declassified it numbness.
y'all so desperately want this guy to be a king. he's not bigger than America, no one is, get over it.
EDIT: remember this? ever wonder why nothing came of it and you never saw even one new page? well its because trump never actually declassified anything, there are steps you have to take, even if youre President, and trump couldn't be bothered.

re: a president's discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/22/22 at 2:36 am to Padme
right. yes. the president can declassify whatever he wants, that is correct. there is no one on the other side of that argument. youre not refuting anything.
thats not the problem, the problem is theres no evidence trump ever declassified these docs, the ones the FBI had to go take back from him. for something to be real, there has to be some evidence it exists. and no trump cant just claim he did it but didnt tell anyone. the American government is not run on wishes, the President cant just have some secret thought and have that be official policy.
the entire point of declassifying something is to change how the government handles it. how are other branches supposed to change if he doesnt tell anyone about it.
most importantly, none of the criminal provisions listed in the search warrant hinge on whether the documents recovered at MAL were classified or not, so it doesnt even matter, he's fricked regardless.
thats not the problem, the problem is theres no evidence trump ever declassified these docs, the ones the FBI had to go take back from him. for something to be real, there has to be some evidence it exists. and no trump cant just claim he did it but didnt tell anyone. the American government is not run on wishes, the President cant just have some secret thought and have that be official policy.
the entire point of declassifying something is to change how the government handles it. how are other branches supposed to change if he doesnt tell anyone about it.
most importantly, none of the criminal provisions listed in the search warrant hinge on whether the documents recovered at MAL were classified or not, so it doesnt even matter, he's fricked regardless.
re: Watching the trial of the machines aka Election Fraud 2020 receipts
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/21/22 at 8:43 pm to Houag80
quote:awww, whats wrong honey, does the snowflake need their safe space?
46 posts. Get lost fig
re: Watching the trial of the machines aka Election Fraud 2020 receipts
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/21/22 at 8:33 pm to tide06
quote:Probably, yes.
That's not what's happening here.
You are entrenched in a predefined position. Nothing anyone here says is going to change your mind because you have already internalized what facts you will accept because they agree with your position. Data that doesn't support your argument will be ignored because it causes cognitive dissonance.
The same goes for the people you are talking down to. What you present as fact they will reject because they don't trust the source or the process by which the conclusions were drawn.
Neither side is changing their mind at this point and a significant portion of the country wouldn't care if the election was stolen because the whole thing has become a zero sum game in which anything that hurts their political opposition they view as a positive.
FTR I have had my mind changed on things. Trans athletes in female sports for example, thats clearly dumb IMO, this is not a popular opinion with liberals. the entire world history of results in any timed sport like swimming and track clearly show that things are not equal there between men and women. its not fair.
waiting until your 18 to get any sort of sex change treatments would be another. there are massive hurdles anyone has to jump to even begin that process, and I understand that, but this one is very important, we need to slow way down IMO. teenagers are emotional and confused, it is not the time to make life altering decisions.
that for me is very real cognitive dissonance, because I support trans people completely (its more that I dont give a shite either way but whatever), and this is inconsistent, but all I can be is honest.
even this will get me called a groomer and marxist and satanic demon of course, because those are the simpletons Im up against.
re: Watching the trial of the machines aka Election Fraud 2020 receipts
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/21/22 at 7:50 pm to tide06
quote:yeah very obviously most of the people here dont agree with me, thats why Im here, to refute. hopefully I can change minds, if nothing else I can point out why someone is wrong. thats not trolling, thats debate. if you need an echo chamber for your delicate little heart, thats on you, toughen the hell up.
No one agrees with you and you aren't changing any minds.
re: Watching the trial of the machines aka Election Fraud 2020 receipts
Posted by UnrealEngine on 8/21/22 at 7:35 pm to subotic
quote:I used "you" exactly as its intended to be used, as a plural personal pronoun, not my fault you cant figure that out.
You should use your words more precisely then
Popular
3










