Started By
Message
locked post

Russian Oligarch Who Allegedly Paid Michael Cohen Is Linked to Clinton Foundation and John

Posted on 5/8/18 at 11:30 pm
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53455 posts
Posted on 5/8/18 at 11:30 pm
Lmao!!!!!!


quote:

New emails show Clinton Foundation staff pushed Hillary Clinton’s State Department to approve a meeting between Bill Clinton and a powerful Russian oligarch as her agency lined up investors for a project under his purview.

The Clintons’ relationship with Viktor Vekselberg, the billionaire whose name appears in the documents, has taken on new significance amid an expanding criminal investigation into his company. Last week, authorities raided the offices of Vekselberg’s firm, Renova Group, following allegations of bribery from several of Renova’s subsidiaries.

Vekselberg had been named head of a partnership dubbed the “Russian Silicon Valley” just three months before a Clinton Foundation employee began pushing the State Department to approve Bill Clinton’s proposed meeting with Vekselberg and a handful of other Russian executives.

The emails, obtained by conservative-leaning Citizens United and provided first to the Washington Examiner, do not reveal any illegal activity on the part of the State Department, the Clintons or their foundation.

But the records shed light on one of many relationships that blurred the lines between the Clinton’s political, financial and philanthropic pursuits while Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state.


Well now.


LINK

What happened to that investigation??? Seems we need to fire that bad boy on up!
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 5/8/18 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

What happened to that investigation??? Seems we need to fire that bad boy on up!



Nope.

No need now.
Posted by TJGator1215
FL/TN
Member since Sep 2011
14174 posts
Posted on 5/8/18 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

The emails, obtained by conservative-leaning Citizens United and provided first to the Washington Examiner, do not reveal any illegal activity on the part of the State Department, the Clintons or their foundation.


Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53455 posts
Posted on 5/8/18 at 11:34 pm to
Gotcha. Only illegal when it's gop people.

Posted by TJGator1215
FL/TN
Member since Sep 2011
14174 posts
Posted on 5/8/18 at 11:36 pm to
I'll let you figure out the difference between the two
Posted by Tigerbait357
Member since Jun 2011
67903 posts
Posted on 5/8/18 at 11:38 pm to
quote:

TJGator1215



You are either a troll or just frickn stupid
Posted by Mephistopheles
Member since Aug 2007
8328 posts
Posted on 5/8/18 at 11:39 pm to
quote:

Gotcha. Only illegal when it's gop people.


It's only illegal if they break the law.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53455 posts
Posted on 5/8/18 at 11:39 pm to
Or...maybe a stupid troll....

I have not even posted the Podesta emails. Was waiting.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53455 posts
Posted on 5/8/18 at 11:40 pm to
Lmao!! Which one broke the law and what law. And why did it break the law....


Let's set aside the fact that it's been debunked by the company.
Posted by Mephistopheles
Member since Aug 2007
8328 posts
Posted on 5/8/18 at 11:44 pm to
Relax sunshine. I'm talking about the Clinton foundation. The end of that article summed it up well, there were certainly ethical concerns about a blurring of the lines with HRC's role.

That ethical qualm has been spun out into some magnificent conspiracy theories.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53455 posts
Posted on 5/8/18 at 11:53 pm to
Isn't that the point. Storm's new man and the left is acting like the road is only a one way street.
Posted by ChexMix
Taste the Deliciousness
Member since Apr 2014
24930 posts
Posted on 5/8/18 at 11:56 pm to
quote:

do not reveal any illegal activity on the part of the State Department, the Clintons or their foundation.
Says who?
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134860 posts
Posted on 5/9/18 at 12:00 am to
quote:

I'll let you figure out the difference between the two

It's basically the same statement Stormy's lawyer made about the Russian.
Posted by Mephistopheles
Member since Aug 2007
8328 posts
Posted on 5/9/18 at 12:23 am to
quote:

sn't that the point. Storm's new man and the left is acting like the road is only a one way street.



That's not really a conspiracy theory though is it? Trump either did or didn't sleep with Daniels, but he definitely did have his attorney pay her for an NDA 9 years later, but then Cohen ran his mouth. So she tried to profit in fairly minor league way, and so in to enforce the NDA Cohen revealed various memorialized documents/court filings, some of which attest to the fact that there's a 130k payment that should appear on the 2016 FEC report but doesn't.

Match the court filings up with the FEC reports for 2016. It's that simple.

That's before we get to the possibility that she can prove he is lying about not having relations with her. In which case Trump knowingly allowed Cohen to file false statements to the court, and both obstructed justice with their misleading statements.

And that's also before we get to whatever it is Cohen's legal bills to Trump say. Either they are documentary evidence of a conspiracy by a sitting president to reimburse his attorney for an act which they both hid from the FEC, or they both know that the bills he sent were bullshite and thus an act of fraud.

It's not like uranium one where you have to pick out one guy who happened to donate to the CF and then say "well that must be the reason she picked Russia to sell our uranium to" when in fact he's just one of a ton of donors who later had a positive or negative interaction with her as head of the state department, and it wasn't her call anyway. And the uranium was already owned by a Canadian company, who sold it off only for Rosatom to turn around and sell the uranium to plants in the US, as was always the plan. If HRC had been selling 20% of the US' uranium she should've got a lot fricking more for it, and she's not stupid. (it was a 51% stake in the company with 20% of the processing capacity, and stakes in uranium mines. Their capacity is now 5.9%).
Posted by Junky
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2005
8373 posts
Posted on 5/9/18 at 5:06 am to
CNN just used the words "pay to play...or potential to" about this guys. This is exactly what the Clintons are guilty of morons....they're so desperate.
Posted by jmcwhrter
Member since Nov 2012
6562 posts
Posted on 5/9/18 at 5:44 am to
quote:

CNN just used the words "pay to play...or potential to" about this guys. This is exactly what the Clintons are guilty of morons....they're so desperate.


Come on guys .. I know she's faded from the spotlight, but this us Clinton 101.

Always accuse others of things you're guilty of FIRST
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146688 posts
Posted on 5/9/18 at 5:51 am to
I called this yesterday.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146688 posts
Posted on 5/9/18 at 5:54 am to
He is also linked to A relative of John Kerry's. Joe Biden's son all via the U1 deal.

Democrats are always what they accuse of. E V E R Y time.
Posted by Machine
Earth
Member since May 2011
6001 posts
Posted on 5/9/18 at 7:42 am to
“But we aren’t the only dirty ones!!! What about them???”



Posted by Oizers
Member since Nov 2009
2643 posts
Posted on 5/9/18 at 7:47 am to
Exactly. They also know that the MSM is not going to mention their involvement.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram