re: Russia says any peacekeeping troops must be from Non NATO Countries

UN Peacekeepers.

quote:

---

I only mentioned China in regards to trusting them more than Europe.

---

I can't imagine Europeans want Chinese patrolling. That's just silly. Maybe we can welcome the Chinese to patrol the Panama Canal or ensure maritime traffic through the Arctic.

quote:

---

Honestly, I’m for no peacekeeping troops at all, from any nation. I’m for a long lasting peace.

---

Peacekeepers kept Egypt/Israel calm, South Korea/North Korea.

It works.

No peacekeepers and no DMZ means that theyd be at war again in 15 minutes.

quote:

---

Chinese or Vietnamese

---

My three were

South Korea= US Friendly(gave artillery to Ukraine)

Vietnam = More Russia Friendly


Saudi Arabia = Neutral

Very well balanced group of Peacekeepers. But since we all know you are a dumbass Owl I had AI give me a breakdown.....




Evaluating the potential effectiveness of South Korea, Vietnam, and Saudi Arabia as peacekeepers in post-war Ukraine involves analyzing their unique strengths, challenges, and geopolitical contexts. Here's a structured assessment:

### **South Korea**
**Strengths**:
- **Resources and Experience**: Advanced military technology, robust training, and participation in UN missions (e.g., Lebanon, South Sudan).
- **Economic Capacity**: Could support reconstruction through financial aid or technical expertise.
- **Global Alignment**: Strong ties with Western allies, aligning with Ukraine’s post-war needs.

**Challenges**:
- **Perceived Neutrality**: Close US alliance and tensions with Russia (due to North Korea ties) might hinder acceptance by Moscow.
- **Domestic Factors**: Public opinion may influence long-term commitment.

**Rating**: 7/10
*Strong capabilities but potential neutrality concerns.*

---

### **Vietnam**
**Strengths**:
- **Neutrality**: Non-aligned foreign policy and balanced relations with Russia/West could foster trust from both Ukraine and Russia.
- **Post-Conflict Experience**: Historical resilience and recent UN peacekeeping contributions (e.g., South Sudan).

**Challenges**:
- **Limited Resources**: Smaller-scale deployments and fewer financial means compared to SK or Saudi Arabia.
- **Bureaucratic Hurdles**: Less institutional experience in large multilateral missions.

**Rating**: 6/10
*Valuable neutrality but constrained by capacity.*

---

### **Saudi Arabia**
**Strengths**:
- **Financial Power**: Capacity to fund reconstruction and peacekeeping logistics.
- **Diplomatic Leverage**: OPEC+ ties with Russia could facilitate dialogue; recent efforts to diversify alliances (e.g., mediating Ukraine-Russia prisoner swaps).

**Challenges**:
- **Credibility Issues**: Involvement in Yemen and perceived authoritarianism may undermine legitimacy.
- **Regional Priorities**: Focus on Middle Eastern stability could divert attention.

**Rating**: 5/10
*Resource-rich but faces significant credibility gaps.*

---

### **Combined Assessment (Mixture)**
1. **Complementary Strengths**:
- South Korea’s resources and Vietnam’s neutrality could balance Saudi Arabia’s financial and diplomatic clout.
- Diverse geopolitical ties (pro-West SK, non-aligned Vietnam, Russia-friendly Saudi) might bridge divides.

2. **Challenges**:
- Coordination complexities due to differing foreign policies.
- Saudi Arabia’s contentious reputation could overshadow contributions.

3. **Overall Potential**:
- If managed under a unified UN framework, this mix could offer a multifaceted approach to peacekeeping and reconstruction. However, success hinges on mitigating neutrality disputes and ensuring cohesive collaboration.

**Composite Rating**: 6/10
*A pragmatic combination with notable synergies but requiring careful diplomatic navigation.*



Not bad....Not bad at all

quote:

---

China is not a neutral party, and any claims to that are lies

---

I never claimed they were neutral. I said they did not send Weapons, Weapon Systems, Tanks, Aircraft, Artillery, Money to Russia. All the links you provided showed no items I just listed that China provided to Russia. You know who did provide the items I listed to Ukraine? Europe.

quote:

---

But I will put right back at you why put China in charge of a mineral-rich region

---

Where do you see China in my list? My List was

South Korea
Vietnam
Saudi Arabia

quote:

---

I never claimed they were neutral. I said they did not send Weapons, Weapon Systems, Tanks, Aircraft, Artillery, Money to Russia. All the links you provided showed no items I just listed that China provided to Russia. You know who did provide the items I listed to Ukraine? Europe.

---

You said:

quote:

---

This seems reasonable. I don't believe China has provided Russia with any Weapons or Weapon Systems like Europe/NATO has provided to Ukraine. Maybe a combination of Australian and Chinese Troops would be a fair compromise for Peacekeeping Troops in Ukraine

---

While I agree that they have not provided specific weapon systems, they are still far too non neutral for peacekeepers.

So MAGA is teaming up with Russia and China?

This might be a Jjdoc alter, after he got busted fundraising for Obama and the Clintons.