- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rod Rosenstein Senate Hearing (10AM EDT)
Posted on 6/3/20 at 11:03 am to IslandBuckeye
Posted on 6/3/20 at 11:03 am to IslandBuckeye
What a snooze fest after Hawley.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 11:04 am to cajunangelle
I think we've probably about found out everything new that we are going to get from RR.
Has anyone asked about him wanting to wear the wiretap?
Also, think someone should ask whether at any time did he have concerns about Mueller's mental capacity and whether Mueller vs. Weissman was running the investigation.
Has anyone asked about him wanting to wear the wiretap?
Also, think someone should ask whether at any time did he have concerns about Mueller's mental capacity and whether Mueller vs. Weissman was running the investigation.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 11:04 am to PhDoogan
I'm so tired of this talking point that they can't do more than one thing at a time.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 11:04 am to Jbird
“Both sides were represented. Leftists AND socialists!”


Posted on 6/3/20 at 11:04 am to BigLSUNut
quote:
Bartender, I'll have some of what he is drinking.
Exactly.
It makes it difficult for me to respond to someone who has absolutely no grasp of the facts and issues involved in this case. Be it on purpose or genuinely ignorant of the facts, I'm done talking with these idiots.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 11:06 am to Kcrad
The left who said they don't trust law, seem happy letting the law make up charges and evidence and railroad people.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 11:06 am to IslandBuckeye
The amount of falsehoods in the biggest scandal in history should require intense scrutiny.
I think he could excuse away small issues, but the large number is concerning regarding his duty.
The fact he testified he did not read the whole document before signing should put Rosenstein in jail.
I think he could excuse away small issues, but the large number is concerning regarding his duty.
The fact he testified he did not read the whole document before signing should put Rosenstein in jail.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 11:08 am to Colonel Flagg
Signing off on documents proven false should put him in jail.
Not reading them first means he shouldn’t be put in any form of protective custody.
Not reading them first means he shouldn’t be put in any form of protective custody.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 11:08 am to Colonel Flagg
quote:
The amount of falsehoods in the biggest scandal in history should require intense scrutiny.
And barry was in charge of all of it. He was a disgrace for our country
Posted on 6/3/20 at 11:08 am to DougsMugs
Everything they do is pulled from a boiling cauldron of hypocrisy.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 11:09 am to teke184
quote:
Problem is that, by the same token, him signing off on the final work means the buck stops with him.
If he isn’t leaning on supervisors to manage people and make sure good work is done, etc, then it falls on him too.
And also makes the case that either the whole of the FBI is hollowed out and corrupt or that there is a significant shadow organization within it able to lie and manipulate at will.
I think he failed as a manager here that's clear. that's just not criminal.
It's clear the system is broken, i'm also not surprised to hear the FBI is dubbing up evidence to get warrants.
It's important to understand what his job is. he's got all the bad actors on this case on those 17 pieces of evidence are signed off on. why aren't they here asking questions. lets talk tot the ones doing dirty work and see if they want to give us anyone big instead of asking a lifelong lawyer questions about it. he wouldn't have signed off if he knew then what he knew how. he was mislead.
evidence submitted to court is the responsibility of the cops not the lawyers. That's why the judges at the trial have the cops show up as witnesses and swear to it instead of the lawyers in the room.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 11:09 am to teke184
I wonder if RICO charges could be brought up against Rosenstein and Obama?
It sure seems like they did the old mafia trick of having the little guy do their dirty work and take the fall, but benefit from the dirty work.
It sure seems like they did the old mafia trick of having the little guy do their dirty work and take the fall, but benefit from the dirty work.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 11:10 am to oklahogjr
quote:
I think he failed as a manager here that's clear. that's just not criminal.
Bro, he wasn't the manager of Dunder Mifflin
Posted on 6/3/20 at 11:10 am to DougsMugs
Nothing will happen to the halfrican 
Posted on 6/3/20 at 11:10 am to Kankles
No, he was the manager of Dindu Nuffin.
Posted on 6/3/20 at 11:11 am to teke184
quote:
Signing off on documents proven false should put him in jail.
He didn't sign off the documents were true. he signed off that the documents were signed off on as true and they met the criteria for the submission.
Popular
Back to top


1









