- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
RICO charges against antifa?
Posted on 5/31/20 at 12:20 am
Posted on 5/31/20 at 12:20 am
Should work, no?
Posted on 5/31/20 at 12:23 am to Zachary
Giuliani used RICO to go after the NY mafia.
Posted on 5/31/20 at 12:24 am to RollTide4Ever
The mafia was why RICO was enacted. I believe the requisite elements are present here.
Posted on 5/31/20 at 12:26 am to Zachary
The way Barr was talking about intercepting coordination communications makes it seem possible. Dunno at all though what kindve approach applies or would be most effective. It’s domestic terrorism that’s for sure and if these communities are as about justice as they claim they should be mad they were used as cover for it.
Posted on 5/31/20 at 12:26 am to Zachary
Tell us what the requisite elements are
Posted on 5/31/20 at 12:29 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Tell us what the requisite elements are
A more expansive view holds that in order to be found guilty of violating the RICO statute, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) that an enterprise existed; (2) that the enterprise affected interstate commerce; (3) that the defendant was associated with or employed by the enterprise; (4) that the defendant engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity; and (5) that the defendant conducted or participated in the conduct of the enterprise through that pattern of racketeering activity through the commission of at least two acts of racketeering activity as set forth in the indictment. United States v. Phillips, 664 F. 2d 971, 1011 (5th Cir. Unit B Dec. 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136, 102 S. Ct. 1265, 73 L. Ed. 2d 1354 (1982).
Dominique Wilkins never had a slam dunk so easy.
any reason for you to ask stupid, easy to look up questions?
Posted on 5/31/20 at 12:30 am to boosiebadazz
They are different possibilities, but generally the requirements include an enterprise (which can be an "association in fact" as opposed to a more formal association), predicate acts (federal crimes), and a "pattern," which is defined as 2 or more. There's more to it than that, but a little weighty for this forum.
This post was edited on 5/31/20 at 12:31 am
Posted on 5/31/20 at 12:31 am to gthog61
Lotta buzzwords in there for the lawyers to wrangle over. Link me to the last criminal RICO conviction of any significance
Posted on 5/31/20 at 12:33 am to Zachary
Barr and Trump mentioned crossing state lines to participate in these riots. I want to believe they know something and can prove it.
Posted on 5/31/20 at 12:37 am to boosiebadazz
Boosie, it doesn't matter if nobody has ever been convicted of it. The question is, do the statutes exist and are these people engaging in said behavior? I don't know because I'm not a lawyer. Supposedly you are though, so maybe you would be better able to answer the second part of that question rather engaging in whatever appeal that is you just made.
Posted on 5/31/20 at 12:40 am to CaTiger85
quote:
The case against Mr. Kapoor and other Insys executives involved extensive testimony about bribes paid to doctors and lies to insurers to get them to pay for the drug, which made it much easier to show a pattern of illegal conduct. But if the violations occur at a lower level in a pharmaceutical company, linking them to the top executives may be difficult.
Better have the AOL chat logs where Soros directs it along with the bank transfer evidence
Posted on 5/31/20 at 12:43 am to BoarEd
BoarEd, it’s incredibly hard to pull a RICO case together and it’s become somewhat of a laughable buzzword.
Even the article linked notes how rare and challenging it is. Maybe it exists here, maybe it doesn’t. But it sounds ominous and has become the go-to for certain segments of internet tough guys
But excuse me for yawning at yet another suggestion this is all a planned and organized plot against at our president and his movement
Even the article linked notes how rare and challenging it is. Maybe it exists here, maybe it doesn’t. But it sounds ominous and has become the go-to for certain segments of internet tough guys
But excuse me for yawning at yet another suggestion this is all a planned and organized plot against at our president and his movement
This post was edited on 5/31/20 at 12:46 am
Posted on 5/31/20 at 12:44 am to boosiebadazz
Don't need evidence of Soros anything to convict others.
This post was edited on 5/31/20 at 12:52 am
Posted on 5/31/20 at 12:47 am to Zachary
Government is already infiltrated
Posted on 5/31/20 at 12:50 am to boosiebadazz
It could be that the incident itself was organic but that the reaction was planned.
I'm not gonna speak to the idea of this being a RICO worthy event though, because I don't know.
I'm not gonna speak to the idea of this being a RICO worthy event though, because I don't know.
Posted on 5/31/20 at 12:55 am to Bobby OG Johnson
quote:
Can't believe they sell that trash on Amazon.
Posted on 5/31/20 at 1:11 am to boosiebadazz
1. The enterprise -- The "association in fact" comprised of the individuals organizing to create this mayhem.
2. Affecting interstate commerce -- if this has, in fact, been part of a coordinated effort to import individuals from out-of-state to cause the mayhem.
3. The predicate acts -- Arson, obstruction of state or local law enforcement, just for starters.
4. The "pattern" -- There seems no dispute the requisite number and proximity exist.
2. Affecting interstate commerce -- if this has, in fact, been part of a coordinated effort to import individuals from out-of-state to cause the mayhem.
3. The predicate acts -- Arson, obstruction of state or local law enforcement, just for starters.
4. The "pattern" -- There seems no dispute the requisite number and proximity exist.
This post was edited on 5/31/20 at 1:15 am
Posted on 5/31/20 at 1:14 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
it’s incredibly hard to pull a RICO case together
Having a SEAL Team take out Soros would be much easier.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News