- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: RI Gov joins in on the baby killing. Ready to sign bill
Posted on 1/31/19 at 12:43 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 1/31/19 at 12:43 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Yes, I think you are an idiot.
Yes, I know you're still smarting from the azz beating I gave you earlier.
Calm down, sweety.
1
Posted on 1/31/19 at 12:44 pm to AggieHank86
You pro abortion types will be on the wrong side of history like slave owners
Posted on 1/31/19 at 12:44 pm to AggieHank86
quote:This is a lazy opening to way too many of your posts.
Again, you are better than this
quote:No offense to either of them, but both of them only had to be the best of their sub-category.
She was the woman selected for the SCOTUS job BECAUSE she was already a pioneer as an attorney ... much like Thurgood Marshall.
quote:Wait. You mean they picked a woman to go before the court and argue for women's rights?
As an example, she was one of the first to argue BEFORE the SCOTUS in support of women's rights.
The frick you say!!!
Posted on 1/31/19 at 12:47 pm to Jjdoc
quote:No, you ignorant buffoon, overturning Roe would remove federal protection for abortion. Yes, I understand. You would like that.
ROE being reversed and outlawing abortion would 100% address the states
But many states would WANT to continue to allow abortion rights. These bills are prophylactic measures to assure that they have those protections in place in the unlikely event that SCOTUS discards Roe.
FYI, Roe iwas a pseudonymous surname, not an acronym.
This post was edited on 1/31/19 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 1/31/19 at 12:47 pm to Jjdoc
Rhode Island governor saying "Hold my beer"
Posted on 1/31/19 at 12:49 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
No, you ignorant buffoon, overturning Roe would remove federal rotection for abortion. Yes, I understand. You would like that. But many states would WANT to continue to allow abortion rights. These bills are prophylactic measuresmto assure that they have those protections in place in the unlikely event that SCOTUS discards Roe. FYI, Roe iwas a pseudonymous surname, not an acronym.
Is your lisp acting up again? I am noticing a lot of typos today...
Posted on 1/31/19 at 12:50 pm to oogabooga68
quote:Posters on YOUR side of this issue were telling you that you were losing, and STILL you do a victory dance.
you're still smarting from the azz beating I gave you earlier.
It is kind of cute, in a toddler sort of way.
Posted on 1/31/19 at 12:53 pm to ChanceOfRainIsNever
quote:
They’re basically daring a challenge to Roe
that's dumb. they will lose.
Posted on 1/31/19 at 12:53 pm to ShortyRob
quote:True. I do not consider her a pioneer for getting onto SCOTUS. Sandy gets that cookie. I consider her to be a pioneer for her accomplishments as an attorney.
No offense to either of them, but both of them only had to be the best of their sub-category.
quote:She was making the arguments because no men were doing so.
You mean they picked a woman to go before the court and argue for women's rights?
Were there some optics involved as well? Of course.
This post was edited on 1/31/19 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 1/31/19 at 12:53 pm to ChanceOfRainIsNever
quote:
They’re basically daring a challenge to Roe by making these laws even more outrageous.
You thought the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings and shite show the Democrats put on for that were bad...wait until Amy Coney Barrett gets nominated to replace RBG
Posted on 1/31/19 at 12:54 pm to ljhog
quote:They WANT to lose.
that's dumb. they will lose.
Don't let yourself be fooled into thinking elected Democrats actually give two fricks about abortion beyond it's ability to be used to paint Republicans as anti-woman.
Posted on 1/31/19 at 12:55 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
But many states would WANT to continue to allow abortion rights.
yes, we would end up with a checkerboard across the map
And I'm OK with federalism among 50 states sharing sovereignty with the U.S. Government.
Posted on 1/31/19 at 12:56 pm to AggieHank86
quote:This is kinda my point.
She was making the arguments because no men were doing so.
Look. It's cool. You were the first woman, black, short person, fat person etc etc etc to do a thing.
It's just that the reality is, 99% of the time when this occurs, it's because we reached a point where there was a major social push for it and..........therefore, they went out and found the best woman, black, short person, fat person etc etc to do a thing.
I'm much more impressed by people who rise to the top of THEIR FIELD by competing against THEIR FIELD.
You know who a female pioneer is? A woman who was picked because she was actually better than EVERYONE in the view of pretty much everyone.
This post was edited on 1/31/19 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 1/31/19 at 12:58 pm to TrueTiger
quote:Me, too. Roe was contrived, and it should always have been a State matter.
yes, we would end up with a checkerboard across the map
And I'm OK with federalism among 50 states sharing sovereignty with the U.S. Government.
So why would any actual federalist have a problem with a given state enacting (OR rejecting) abortion legislation supported by the majority of its citizens?
50 laboratories, baby!
Posted on 1/31/19 at 1:01 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Me, too. Roe was contrived, and it should always have been a State matter.
So why would any actual federalist have a problem with a given state enacting (OR rejecting) abortion legislation supported by the majority of its citizens?
50 laboratories, baby!
Like I said. What the Dems are doing here is throwing in a poison pill.
They elevated the argument above just Roe. They're basically trying to force the Supreme Court into ruling that a full term health baby, is in fact, a fricking person.
Then, they'll go flat out ape shite with the "conservatives hate women" shite.
This isn't about abortion. It's basically about the same thing they do in terms of screaming racism re:Blacks. It's a voter plantation effort.
Posted on 1/31/19 at 1:07 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Interesting theory.
This isn't about abortion. It's basically about the same thing they do in terms of screaming racism re:Blacks. It's a voter plantation effort.
Posted on 1/31/19 at 1:13 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
The bill would:
prohibit the state or any of its agencies from interfering with any individual’s reproductive health care, including a decision to terminate a pregnancy prior to fetal viability, or after that point in cases when necessary to preserve the woman’s health or life
eliminate several chapters that make it a criminal offense to perform an abortion or help a woman obtain one, as well as a law enacted in 1973 following the Roe v. Wade decision that defines human life as commencing “at the instant of conception.”
eliminate laws requiring that the husband of any married woman is notified before she can terminate a pregnancy
lift restrictions that prevent insurers from covering the procedure
Since you obviously aren't going to show how incredibly full of shite you are.
Posted on 1/31/19 at 1:14 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Interesting theory.
Thinking about it further. I think that even the craziest lefty knows that the idea of aborting a healthy full term baby because mommy is a shade crazy is NOT palatable to the population and is in fact, overwhelmingly opposed.
So. They're not retarded. They did NOT intend to send THAT message.
But, they've always had success winking at the health exception and getting away with it. And, if you think about it, it's not hard.
Once in play, it's not like you'll directly hear about it. Some woman aborts a baby in month 8 because boyfriend who promised to stay dumped her? That shite is guarded by medical privacy. You aren't going to see that reported. And, to be fair, it will be rare, so, you don't have to huge mess to clean up even if boyfriend talks.
But, if you OPPOSE them on the bill, they immediately drop into rhetoric of, "you don't care about harming women!!!!! All while ignoring the actual meaning of the health exception.
It always has been a great "heads I win, tails you lose" game.
What they didn't count on was good old Gov and idiot Tran fricking creating videos that went viral. THAT part, they didn't anticipate.
They thought they were going to get "PROOF" that a conservative court hated women
Hell. I could see them trying to use it to impeach justices if the politics went right going forward for them.
This post was edited on 1/31/19 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 1/31/19 at 1:17 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Anybody think this was not a co-ordinated effort across the nation within the Dem party?
And it all ties in with the fact that RBG is about to keel over, if she hasn’t already. They’re panicking because they’re convinced that overturning Roe is going to be SCOTUS’ first order of business once she’s gone.
This post was edited on 1/31/19 at 1:19 pm
Posted on 1/31/19 at 1:20 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I bet myself $100 before clicking that the link would lead to Gateway Pundit.
I just shifted a Benjamin from one pocket to the other.
Subtle “I have $100” brag.
Page 4 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News