- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Reposted by Elon Musk. America has no clue what is happening in the UK & Europe.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 2:13 pm to OccamsStubble
Posted on 9/18/25 at 2:13 pm to OccamsStubble
quote:
Most likely, a direct threat of violence, which is a felony: assault.
Because we are soft and gay
Constitution says "no law" and that should be it.
2
Posted on 9/18/25 at 2:25 pm to AncientTiger
The combined population of India, China, USA, Brazil and Russia is 3.75 Billion people. Literally half the world's population.
They have 1/6th the amount of internet posting arrests than the UK.
The UK has 60M people....
This was apparently a documentary.
They have 1/6th the amount of internet posting arrests than the UK.
The UK has 60M people....
This was apparently a documentary.
This post was edited on 9/18/25 at 2:28 pm
Posted on 9/18/25 at 2:36 pm to Schleynole
quote:
quote:
Most likely, a direct threat of violence, which is a felony: assault.
Because we are soft and gay
Constitution says "no law" and that should be it.
If that monster on the bus stands over that Ukrainian girl, opens his knife, and screams "I'm gonna cut you to pieces, bitch", I'd prefer that she be able to claim assault, and not simply tell her "well, you're gay"
Posted on 9/18/25 at 2:38 pm to BeepBopBoop
quote:
England has never been free.
100%
People have this strange Western Civ idea because of America's relationship and heritage with the UK that we have and have had similar mindsets and ideology... Which is odd for all the reasons the US came into being.
About the only thing we've had in common is English (slumping in America), God (gone in the UK) and predominantly Caucasian (teetering for both).
This post was edited on 9/18/25 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 9/18/25 at 2:44 pm to HubbaBubba
I have to believe the US arrests have to do with real serious threats of a particular nature.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 2:59 pm to Hangover Haven
Someone was arrested in Hammond for posting a letter saying they wanted to kill a bunch of people at Southeastern. I think the 50 US arrests are of that nature. I’m ok with that. It’s not like they are held are prison long term. They just go on a watch list.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 3:00 pm to AncientTiger
Just want to comment that you obviously cannot believe that Chinese number.
Its what THEY report. Which is, of course, a lie
Its what THEY report. Which is, of course, a lie
Posted on 9/18/25 at 3:11 pm to AncientTiger
People were telling Elon to ban the people on X celebrating Kirk’s death. That, to me, would “go against” free speech. (He didn’t ban them.)
people losing their jobs, however— that’s just a meet certain behavior expectations or get fired thing.
Those who lost jobs failed to act like civilized adults, so they were fired. Their firings have nothing to do with free speech. If an employee goes on x or Facebook or insta and posts a bunch of perverted stuff, and it’s called to their employer’s attention, they may get fired for such postings. Employees are at the mercy of employers when it comes to a lot of things.
And jimmy just flat out lied and further fanned the flames of the fires that led to Kirk’s death. That plus his terrible ratings is why he got fired.
people losing their jobs, however— that’s just a meet certain behavior expectations or get fired thing.
Those who lost jobs failed to act like civilized adults, so they were fired. Their firings have nothing to do with free speech. If an employee goes on x or Facebook or insta and posts a bunch of perverted stuff, and it’s called to their employer’s attention, they may get fired for such postings. Employees are at the mercy of employers when it comes to a lot of things.
And jimmy just flat out lied and further fanned the flames of the fires that led to Kirk’s death. That plus his terrible ratings is why he got fired.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 3:44 pm to OccamsStubble
quote:He murdered her and didn't say a word. There's no other way to interpret it than "no law". It's like when science claims everything came from nothing. Nothing means nothing, no law means no law. An idiot can interpret it just as good as a genius.
that monster on the bus stands over that Ukrainian girl, opens his knife, and screams "I'm gonna cut you to pieces, bitch", I'd prefer that she be able to claim assault, and not simply tell her "well, you're gay"
Posted on 9/18/25 at 4:04 pm to AncientTiger
Depends on the comments.
Inciting violence?
Inciting violence?
Posted on 9/18/25 at 4:42 pm to Schleynole
quote:
Congress shall make no law (unless you cross the line and try to start some shite )respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
But....
quote:
Yes, making threatening comments to someone online can lead to criminal charges under both state and federal laws, as these threats are treated seriously and can result in significant legal consequences. Such actions may be classified as harassment, stalking, or making threats, depending on the nature of the communication.
I'm pretty sure the Supreme court has already handled a few of these.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 5:56 pm to DMAN1968
quote:
I'm pretty sure the Supreme court has already handled a few of these.
I can interpret "no law" as good as anyone. I don't need the supreme court to tell me what it means
Posted on 9/18/25 at 6:15 pm to Schleynole
quote:
I can interpret "no law" as good as anyone. I don't need the supreme court to tell me what it means
Well then go give it a shot...see how it works out for you.
While you're at it give out your wife's name and email address to every freak across the internet and see how that goes. Have a daughter? Throw her info out there as well.
Maybe your right. The founding father's would have surely included a rule against this if fricking threats by messenger pigeon had been more of an issue.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 6:24 pm to Schleynole
quote:
Congress shall make no law (unless you cross the line and try to start some shite )respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
I almost upvoted you because that was very funny. But inciting violence has always been against the law, and it should be.
quote:
The First Amendment guards citizens' rights to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition the government. But these rights come with limits. Certain speech or acts receive limited or no First Amendment protections, such as obscenity, child pornography, threats of violence, and speech that incites riots, violence, or insurrection.
That’s from a website that purports to explain laws.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 6:27 pm to Schleynole
quote:
Constitution says "no law" and that should be it.
Ridiculous
You think a person should be able to start yelling, at a crowded event, “He’s got a gun”? Of course not.
Posted on 9/18/25 at 6:32 pm to Tigergreg
quote:
get his point, but the U.S. is not arresting people for online comments. People are losing their jobs and being publicly shamed. Freedom of speech protects you from arrest. You can be fired from your job or expelled from school, depending on the circumstances. You are still accountable for your actions. Consequences.
His point is that no one is being arrested, while they are elsewhere.
Your “but….” seems misplaced
Posted on 9/18/25 at 7:43 pm to Penrod
quote:
Ridiculous
Tell me what no law means
Posted on 9/18/25 at 7:46 pm to DMAN1968
quote:
Maybe your right. The founding father's would have surely included a rule against this if fricking threats by messenger pigeon had been more of an issue.
They addressed it with press lol. What do you think press is referring to
Posted on 9/18/25 at 7:51 pm to HubbaBubba
Those are death threats most likely
Posted on 9/18/25 at 8:05 pm to Schleynole
quote:You ma’am are too stupid to engage in dialogue.
Schleynole
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News