Started By
Message

re: Repost of Dr David Martin Video. The truth behind the Covid fraud. Who what and when.

Posted on 11/30/21 at 9:17 am to
Posted by TS1926
Alabama
Member since Jan 2020
7617 posts
Posted on 11/30/21 at 9:17 am to
quote:

HiJbird, hope you had a good thanksgiving!

Funny - When I look up the patent it does not list him as any kind of inventor of it.

I think he registered it on these peoples behalf -


Serious question. Do you ever research and verify articles and so called "experts" in the Reuters, AP, NPR, WAPO, NYT, CNN "stories that you read? Or do you take every single word they say or write as nothing but whole truth?
This post was edited on 11/30/21 at 9:19 am
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
69329 posts
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Does he explain why so many have lost taste/smell for so long? Those crazy side effects reported in so many are my main issue with any “it doesn’t exist” argument.


He's not saying it doesn't exist, he's saying it isn't "novel". "Novel" suggests that it's new and just appeared out of thin air. He's arguing that it was invented in a lab and tinkered with, but was invented in 2005. He's not saying there is no virus, he's saying that it's not new. It's a carefully curated bioweapon that was intentionally released.
Posted by FutureMikeVIII
Houston
Member since Sep 2011
1637 posts
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:28 am to
quote:

That's why it's called Covid-19 instead of, say, Covid-4.


Lol, no. It’s COVID-19 for the year 2019.

Or is it the CCP’s 19th formulation of their extreme terror SARS bioweapon? Makes you think.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
126096 posts
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:29 am to
quote:

kingbob
What this guy said.
Posted by ChexMix
Taste the Deliciousness
Member since Apr 2014
25494 posts
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:53 am to
You can tell you were given that response and it was not generated organically.
Posted by LakeCharles
USA
Member since Oct 2016
5349 posts
Posted on 11/30/21 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

Timing was too coordinated. No such thing as coincidence. It was lab created & then purposely released.

That is exactly what he says in the video. His point of contention is that it is not "novel" since it has been patented before it was released. Even a little research will lead a person to the 2015 paper from the Wuhan lab coauthored by scientists at UNC about using a mouse virus as the backbone and creating a chimera with a bat coronavirus. A year and a half ago, it was hosted by the UNC website but somehow was removed. The last time I checked, it was still up at the Wuhan lab website.

Posted by NeilBS
Member since Nov 2019
480 posts
Posted on 11/30/21 at 3:42 pm to
Here is that 2015 paper A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence and an article about it Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research

But these show techniques that could be used to create the CCP virus. But they don't imply that the CCP virus itself existed in 2015 or earlier.
Posted by Sneauxghost
Member since Sep 2020
1288 posts
Posted on 11/30/21 at 5:33 pm to
I work in blood diagnostics research. I’ve tried to tell people since day 1. I’m glad the awakening is finally happening. A little slow, but finally.
Posted by LakeCharles
USA
Member since Oct 2016
5349 posts
Posted on 12/1/21 at 12:54 am to
quote:

But they don't imply that the CCP virus itself existed in 2015 or earlier.


Notice the last two authors of the paper - Zhengli-Li Shi & Ralph S Baric. Li ZhengLi is the famous bat lady. As far as this being covid, maybe, maybe not, but it is the way something like covid would be developed. Just run it through the human lung cell cultures a couple more times.

Posted by BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
Member since May 2019
7439 posts
Posted on 12/1/21 at 5:30 am to
This is your quote:
quote:

And by the way he is making the argument why the vaccine can be trusted.


quote:

What I meant to say is he is inadvertently and I presume unintentionally explaining why
...
quote:

vaccines to treat it are not new so it's not right to say they are newly invented, risky, etc.


mRNA vaccines are new in that they have never made it out of clinical trials. They always inadvertently and I assume unintentionally kill all the test animals.

It is 100% accurate to say the vaccines are newly invented AND risky. Just the concept of mRNA vaccines isn't novel.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram