- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Repost of Dr David Martin Video. The truth behind the Covid fraud. Who what and when.
Posted on 11/30/21 at 9:17 am to Eurocat
Posted on 11/30/21 at 9:17 am to Eurocat
quote:
HiJbird, hope you had a good thanksgiving!
Funny - When I look up the patent it does not list him as any kind of inventor of it.
I think he registered it on these peoples behalf -
Serious question. Do you ever research and verify articles and so called "experts" in the Reuters, AP, NPR, WAPO, NYT, CNN "stories that you read? Or do you take every single word they say or write as nothing but whole truth?
This post was edited on 11/30/21 at 9:19 am
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:23 am to LSUfan20005
quote:
Does he explain why so many have lost taste/smell for so long? Those crazy side effects reported in so many are my main issue with any “it doesn’t exist” argument.
He's not saying it doesn't exist, he's saying it isn't "novel". "Novel" suggests that it's new and just appeared out of thin air. He's arguing that it was invented in a lab and tinkered with, but was invented in 2005. He's not saying there is no virus, he's saying that it's not new. It's a carefully curated bioweapon that was intentionally released.
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:28 am to Eurocat
quote:
That's why it's called Covid-19 instead of, say, Covid-4.
Lol, no. It’s COVID-19 for the year 2019.
Or is it the CCP’s 19th formulation of their extreme terror SARS bioweapon? Makes you think.
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:29 am to kingbob
quote:What this guy said.
kingbob
Posted on 11/30/21 at 10:53 am to Eurocat
You can tell you were given that response and it was not generated organically.
Posted on 11/30/21 at 2:41 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Timing was too coordinated. No such thing as coincidence. It was lab created & then purposely released.
That is exactly what he says in the video. His point of contention is that it is not "novel" since it has been patented before it was released. Even a little research will lead a person to the 2015 paper from the Wuhan lab coauthored by scientists at UNC about using a mouse virus as the backbone and creating a chimera with a bat coronavirus. A year and a half ago, it was hosted by the UNC website but somehow was removed. The last time I checked, it was still up at the Wuhan lab website.
Posted on 11/30/21 at 3:42 pm to LakeCharles
Here is that 2015 paper A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence and an article about it Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research
But these show techniques that could be used to create the CCP virus. But they don't imply that the CCP virus itself existed in 2015 or earlier.
But these show techniques that could be used to create the CCP virus. But they don't imply that the CCP virus itself existed in 2015 or earlier.
Posted on 11/30/21 at 5:33 pm to Swazla
I work in blood diagnostics research. I’ve tried to tell people since day 1. I’m glad the awakening is finally happening. A little slow, but finally.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 12:54 am to NeilBS
quote:
But they don't imply that the CCP virus itself existed in 2015 or earlier.
Notice the last two authors of the paper - Zhengli-Li Shi & Ralph S Baric. Li ZhengLi is the famous bat lady. As far as this being covid, maybe, maybe not, but it is the way something like covid would be developed. Just run it through the human lung cell cultures a couple more times.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 5:30 am to Eurocat
This is your quote:
mRNA vaccines are new in that they have never made it out of clinical trials. They always inadvertently and I assume unintentionally kill all the test animals.
It is 100% accurate to say the vaccines are newly invented AND risky. Just the concept of mRNA vaccines isn't novel.
quote:
And by the way he is making the argument why the vaccine can be trusted.
quote:...
What I meant to say is he is inadvertently and I presume unintentionally explaining why
quote:
vaccines to treat it are not new so it's not right to say they are newly invented, risky, etc.
mRNA vaccines are new in that they have never made it out of clinical trials. They always inadvertently and I assume unintentionally kill all the test animals.
It is 100% accurate to say the vaccines are newly invented AND risky. Just the concept of mRNA vaccines isn't novel.
Back to top

0






