re: Report: Mifsud’s secret recording is the predicate for Durham criminal inquiry

quote:

---

You're an ignoramus. Solomon is a fraud. His March 20 interview with Lutsenko - everything he reported turned out to be a lie.

---

According to whom? And where’s the proof he was lying?

You fricktard Lefties claimed for 2 years that Trump’s “Obama tapped my wires” claim was a lie. And then when it was proven that they were abusing the NSA 702 program to do illegal unmaskings, securing falsified FISA warrants to exploit the 2-hop rule for surveilling Trump communications, and leaking full goddamn transcripts of Trump phone calls, all you assholes could do was go, “Well they didn’t literally tap his wires! So it’s still a lie!”

You mother frickers can’t help but be obnoxiously dishonest. You have zero credibility. Not a goddamn thing you say here is believed by anyone.

Someday you’ll realize you were on the wrong side of history in this whole thing. And even then you’ll assuredly try to lie to yourself to save yourself from shame. Because you are not honest and that’s just what cowardly dishonest shitty people do. Now go frick yourself.

quote:

---

second question: do you believe the Mueller Report exonerated Trump and his campaign from collusion with Russia? yes or no

---

The report made no finding on collusion because, as it said, collusion is not a legal.

They didn't exonerate Trump. They said they didn't have enough evidence. Sort of like what Comet said about The Hillary emails case.

It also said that the investigation was inhibited by the fact that the Trump admin used encrypted emails and vanishing text messages.

I would normally advise you not to waste your time on this irreparably lost soul, but I enjoy the back and forth.

quote:

---

It's interesting you chose not to address the specifics of my post.

Want to try again?

---

I am not convinced you are telling the truth therefore no need to address it. However, this thread is about a different subject and we should stay on that topic.

quote:

---

The report made no finding on collusion because, as it said, collusion is not a legal. They didn't exonerate Trump. They said they didn't have enough evidence. Sort of like what Comet said about The Hillary emails case. It also said that the investigation was inhibited by the fact that the Trump admin used encrypted emails and vanishing text messages

---

Not a shred of honesty

Did you get that? Mueller spent years investigating collusion for the lulz

quote:

---

yeah i've said for a good while now that Mifsud is the key variable

if he's a Russian asset, as alleged in the Meuller Report, then it all makes some sense

---

If Barr/Durham corroborate that Misfud was a Russian asset, then the Mueller report is corroborated, and there is no need to expand Durham's investigation into 2017 much less any criminal investigation.

But, because the investigation was expanded beyond the election and morphed into a criminal investigation, Misfud is more likely than not is a Western asset, correct?

I think you have been saying this all morning but I've been bouncing around and may be a bit slow on the uptake this AM.

quote:

---

If Barr/Durham corroborate that Misfud was a Russian asset, then the Mueller report is corroborated, and there is no need to expand Durham's investigation into 2017 much less any criminal investigation.

But, because the investigation was expanded beyond the election and morphed into a criminal investigation, Misfud is more likely than not is a Western asset, correct?

I think you have been saying this all morning but I've been bouncing around and may be a bit slow on the uptake this AM.

---

The truth of all this is in the simple logical deduction flow. Just follow that from what we know.

1. Mifsud told PapaD SPECIFICALLY that Russia had dirt on Hillary in the form of thousands of her stolen emails.

2. Crossfire Hurricane was opened on THE BASIS of PapaD allegedly spreading this information unwittingly to foreign diplomats.

3. The Mueller report labeled Mifsud THE RUSSIAN ASSET that kicked off the “investigation”.

4. Our IC/DOJ interviewed Mifsud twice AFTER they named him in the FISA warrants and renewals as the Russian asset, and yet didn’t arrest him.

5. Mifsud went into hiding under Italian Intelligence protection... why? He wasn’t arrested by us, so wouldn’t that suggest he didn’t do anything wrong and wasn’t a Russian asset? So why would he need to hide and be protected?

6. The ONLY possible logical rationale would be he’s in danger. And why would he be in danger if we didn’t arrest him for being a Russian asset?

7. The ONLY possible reason would be that he’s a loose end of a real conspiracy. Because if he’s a legit cog in an illegal conspiracy, Italian Intelligence isn’t going to protect him and then hand over his recorded depositions to Durham. They’d either kill him themselves, hand him over long ago, or just tell us to frick off. But they are not. They gave his recorded depositions of a guy they are obviously helping hide. Which means he’s in legit danger.

8. Durham turned this into a criminal investigation upon hearing Mifsud’s recordings.

9. There’s no question that he isn’t a Russian asset as a result of this flow of events. Which is a direct contradiction to the Mueller report and “evidence” presented in the FISA warrants.

10. Now why would the Mueller team and FBI/DOJ have made such incredible falsehoods? And why would Mifsud be in danger? The only possible reason is this was a setup and Mifsud is a loose end.

quote:

---

texridder

---

quote:

---

Answer me one question.

---

Why do you attack the source instead of discussing the information?

I find this to be a trait of you Soros phallus sucking scum!

The missing 18 1/2 minutes