Started By
Message

re: Report: Mifsud’s secret recording is the predicate for Durham criminal inquiry

Posted on 10/26/19 at 7:04 am to
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
87443 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 7:04 am to
quote:

Even a Mueller would have to have known he wasn’t A Russian asset.


You mean Weissmann.

You saw Mueller’s testimony. I’m not sure he knows what day it is.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112317 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 7:32 am to
Countdown to Democrat demands to hear directly from Mifsud in 3...2...1...
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14935 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 7:33 am to
quote:

should have listened to me last night

go check out my latest thread, bruv

Anyone who posts anything from Solomon after his reporting on Ukraine is either ignorant or pathological.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465456 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 7:35 am to
quote:

Anyone who posts anything from Solomon after his reporting on Ukraine is either ignorant or pathological.

that article was linked about UK/AUS influence in the investigation (corroborating the Mueller allegation)

it's funny you ignore the real information in the OP to cherry pick an author you don't like, who is irrelevant to the situation. want me to go link a different author who states the same thing and edit OP? will that make you feel better?
Posted by claremontrich
Member since Nov 2016
2001 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 7:42 am to






Jk



Nice job
This post was edited on 10/26/19 at 7:43 am
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14935 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 8:18 am to
quote:

It's funny you ignore the real information in the OP to

Answer me one question.

If this was all a set up and if the FBI was itching to start it's investigation, why did it take 2 months for the Aussies to give the Papadoc info to the U.S.?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465456 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 8:25 am to
quote:

If this was all a set up and if the FBI was itching to start it's investigation, why did it take 2 months for the Aussies to give the Papadoc info to the U.S.?

i don't think they only used Papa information and the Carter Page trip to Russia in July 2016 was also used

i'm sure we will find out more details after the investigation and/or the OIG report
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
20696 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 8:25 am to
quote:

why did it take 2 months for the Aussies to give the Papadoc info to the U.S.?


I think you know the answer. Ever dealt with govt bureaucracy?
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
24083 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Anyone who posts anything from Solomon after his reporting on Ukraine is either ignorant or pathological.


Solomon has been the 2nd best reporter in the country the last 3 years behind Sara carter. His reporting has been impeccable
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8826 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 8:36 am to
Probably knows the CIA really doesn’t want him talking to anyone, which the solve by....
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14935 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Solomon has been the 2nd best reporter in the country the last 3 years behind Sara carter. His reporting has been impeccable

You're an ignoramus. Solomon is a fraud. His March 20 interview with Lutsenko - everything he reported turned out to be a lie.

Sara Carter. Fox news told Hannity he had to stop referring to her as an "investigative" reporter.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46030 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 8:48 am to
Melt bitch
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
93135 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Fox news told Hannity he had to stop referring to her as an "investigative" reporter.


And he didnt stop. No one is listening to Paul Ryan or Cuck Murdoch

You also seemed disturbed by finding out the truth. Especially now that we know the wires were tapped. But You are a known liar so no one should be surprised
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 8:51 am to
Bless your heart. Solomon, Carter and Herridge are among the best in the business.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46030 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 8:55 am to
Isn’t the hubris of liberals amazing? To come here and accuse John Solomon and Sara Carter of fake news against the backdrop of a fricking abyss of confirmed fake news from their preferred networks. Unreal.

Did ABC apologize yet for showing fake video in their coverage of the Kurdish conflict with Turkey?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465456 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 8:56 am to
why do you keep responding to comments about reporters and not the actual issues?

simple question: if Mifsud was a western asset, why would he contact Pap about "dirt" that Russia had on HRC?

second question: do you believe the Mueller Report exonerated Trump and his campaign from collusion with Russia? yes or no
This post was edited on 10/26/19 at 8:57 am
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14935 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Bless your heart. Solomon, Carter and Herridge are among the best in the business.

It's interesting you chose not to address the specifics of my post.

Want to try again?
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46030 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 8:58 am to
You are the one attacking the messenger. Stay on point or gtfo
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
24083 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 8:59 am to
quote:

You're an ignoramus. Solomon is a fraud. His March 20 interview with Lutsenko - everything he reported turned out to be a lie.

Sara Carter. Fox news told Hannity he had to stop referring to her as an "investigative" reporter.


You don’t have the mental or emotional capacity to identity truth or reality.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465456 posts
Posted on 10/26/19 at 9:00 am to
quote:

If this was all a set up and if the FBI was itching to start it's investigation, why did it take 2 months for the Aussies to give the Papadoc info to the U.S.?


after some looking, this is the official story (and it's from The AP so i hope you won't attack the messeage

quote:

Afterward, Mr. Downer filed an intelligence report that said, according to the Mueller report: “Papadopoulos suggested to a representative of a foreign government that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information that would be damaging to Hillary Clinton.”

The ‘bottle blonde’ and ‘the Walrus’

After WikiLeaks dumped its first huge batch of Russian-stolen Democratic Party emails on July 22, 2016, the Aussie government sent Mr. Downer’s Papadopoulos cable to Washington.

The FBI by then knew the Russian military was hacking Democratic computers in 2015 and 2016. Papadopoulos did not.


oh, and

quote:

On July 31, 2016, FBI agent Peter Strzok, whose text messages revealed a deep dislike of candidate Trump and a vow to “stop” him, used Mr. Downer’s words to open “Crossfire Hurricane.”

A day before the WikiLeaks disclosures, Mr. Strzok texted a colleague, “Trump is a disaster. I have no idea how destabilizing his Presidency would be.”


if i replace the "Solomon" link in my OP with this one, would you then accept that my thread is worthy of your presence/comment?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram