Started By
Message
locked post

Regarding the National Debt, Where is the Point of No Return?

Posted on 2/12/14 at 6:35 pm
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
46325 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 6:35 pm
Obviously, Congress doesn't consider $17 Trillion (and rising) to be that big of a deal, since the GOP basically surrendered regarding the latest hike in the debt ceiling.

So, here's my question. I'm assuming that nobody here wants to see OUR COUNTRY eventually collapse underneath a mountain of debt. So, forgetting liberal, conservative, Democrat, Republican, black or white, Bush this or Obama that....

At what point do ALL OF US need to be extremely worried about our rising national debt? If no corrective action is taken, at what point does the bubble burst?
Posted by DonChowder
Sonoma County
Member since Dec 2012
9249 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

At what point do ALL OF US need to be extremely worried about our rising national debt?
Now. But it could also be too late. May be time to sit back and watch the whole thing crumble.
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
59597 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 6:39 pm to
we have passed it and it will be a huge deal for this country. Running up trillions of dollars of debt has ruined the value of the dollar. The next big crisis will be started by a significant fall of some worthless currency it very well could be the Dollar or something else. Our policies of just pilling in money to debt is running this country into disaster.

Think of it this way. If your daughter ran up a 10000 dollar debt on a credit card and couldn't pay it off would you give her 50000 dollars to spend on more things? No you would take the card away from her make sure her life isn't ruined by it, get her to talk to a finical advisor and help her get into control of her money.
This post was edited on 2/12/14 at 6:40 pm
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

Regarding the National Debt, Where is the Point of No Return?


When the Federal Reserve loses control of interest rates.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

Think of it this way. If your daughter ran up a 10000 dollar debt on a credit card and couldn't pay it off would you give her 50000 dollars to spend on more things? No you would take the card away from her make sure her life isn't ruined by it, get her to talk to a finical advisor and help her get into control of her money.



The flaw in your analogy is assuming that federal government finances are a zero sum game. They are not. The Federal Reserve will always be there to prop up their deficit spending and keep the cost of money low.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

The flaw in your analogy is assuming that federal government finances are a zero sum game. They are not. The Federal Reserve will always be there to prop up their deficit spending and keep the cost of money low.


This is quite relevant.

Honestly we passed the point of no return either in the teens with the establishment of the federal reserve, or when nixon trashed the gold standard, or maybe when Reagan showed that "deficits don't matter." Not too sure which is the killer, probably reagan.

With that said, as long as our debt is denominated in the dollar, we don't have to worry **that** much. We can always print to pay it off. Yes it will cause inflation but we are not talking argentina or weimer republic. Their debts were denominated in other currencies.
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
29350 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 6:55 pm to
Son, that ship sailed a loooonnnnnggggg time ago. Think about it this way: if we began paying $500B every year in addition to what we're already paying in interest, it would still take around 40 years to pay it off.

Now, consider this: the Democrats and their buddies in the media went absolutely bananas when the sequester 'cut' $90B out of the budget.

This debt will NEVER be paid off. It would be nice if we could just stop it in its tracks, though.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
46325 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 6:58 pm to
You're blaming a man who left office in 1989?

There's absolutely nothing we can do now?

I don't get the logic there.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

You're blaming a man who left office in 1989?

Yes. Before reagan, debt was reserved for use during war or other calamity. Reagan just spent, spent, spent. He set the stage that deficits didn't matter to the overall health of the economy. Everyone after reagan just copied his lead. Granted obama took it up a notch, but so did Bush.

There is literally nothing we can do. Both parties are completely addicted to the stimulus effects of debt spending.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 7:08 pm to
This thread needs a definition of what the "point" of no return means.

To me that point is where the current economy cannot support current spending. We are past that point now. The Federal Reserve spends (prints) 30 billion on treasuries a month (was 40 billion a couple of months ago). Can we get behind the point as I defined? That has yet to be determined. The Federal Reserve is trying in what they currently call tapering.
This post was edited on 2/12/14 at 7:10 pm
Posted by M. A. Ryland
silver spring, MD
Member since Dec 2005
2135 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 7:11 pm to
The point of no return was around 15 Trillion.
too late now.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
100519 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

the stimulus effects of debt spending.


If this were true, then why hasn't our economy rebounded?

I think it's gotten to a point where stimulus spending has gone too far and has actually hurt the economy rather than help it.

Keynesian economics work well short term to give a boost, but you have to scale it back once there are improvements. We aren't scaling anything back. It's like having a credit card..it's good to use in crucial situations where you are short on money at the moment.

But if you run it up to the point you can't pay it back then eventually you have to file bankruptcy.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

If this were true, then why hasn't our economy rebounded?

I think it's gotten to a point where stimulus spending has gone too far and has actually hurt the economy rather than help it.

Keynesian economics work well short term to give a boost, but you have to scale it back once there are improvements. We aren't scaling anything back. It's like having a credit card..it's good to use in crucial situations where you are short on money at the moment.

But if you run it up to the point you can't pay it back then eventually you have to file bankruptcy.

Oh, we definitely got growth from the spending, but it was a probably low multiplier factor since much of it was just spent on stupid shite. Some stimulus spending, such as infrastructure, gives you a good multiplier since it helps business. Others such as art shows gives a shitty multiplier since it generates no additional economic activity. The stimulus bill had a lot of art shows and very little infrastructure.

But I don't think any economist would argue that we got a short term bump, although they may argue over how much.

I do agree its not sustainable, and the problem is not keynsian policies but instead how they are implemented. We are seeing the effect of non stop use, i.e. bridge to nowhere, generating very little growth.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 7:24 pm to
It's long passed.
This post was edited on 2/12/14 at 7:25 pm
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

Regarding the National Debt, Where is the Point of No Return?



All ready there.


Forward!


Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

Hawkeye95

agree on the stimulus being spent in large part on things that are just not valuable. there are some public investments that can get us good returns- like infrastructure to a point, as you mentioned. i actually see that type of investment as supply-side, as it can boost our productive capacity.

that doesn't mean that spending infinite dollars on infinite infrastructure is infinitely valuable though. there is only so much worthwhile investment to be had. and i absolutely do not believe that enough was available for a sufficient stimulus.

but from what i can see you should post more
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112649 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 7:46 pm to
About $5 trillion ago.
Posted by lsuroadie
South LA
Member since Oct 2007
8454 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

When the Federal Reserve loses control of interest rates


this
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

When the Federal Reserve loses control of interest rates.

this, probably. depends on what we're trying to "return" from and to
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
37967 posts
Posted on 2/12/14 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

But if you run it up to the point you can't pay it back then eventually you have to file bankruptcy.
1933 says hi.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram