re: Redbone's thread, as requested

quote:

---

What is that point, to the extent that you understand it to be?

---

you seem to be convinced that we'd buy your argument if only we understood it correctly, so you tell us why you think you can keep comparing slavery to something that is different by definition

What a pussy. You can Google it yourself, but you will demand others do it for you, and when they don't, you just deny it exists. Even if someone did your homework for you, you'd still deny it because only a fricking window licker thinks Mexico can write us a check to build a 2000 mile wall without Congress being involved.

You are a small little pussy.

His point clearly was renegotiating the bad trade deals with Mexico and use the $ saved to build the wall.

quote:

---

Fourteen28

---

Name checks out.

Another dumb liberal that expected a NASCAR type check signed by Mexico...

quote:

---

Nowhere will you find a proposal for Mexico to hand us one of those giant golf tournament checks in the Rose Garden

---

I don't know who came up with your weird Rose Garden fantasy, but wow, you are hopelessly confused. I mean, you're the exact opposite of correct.

The entire proposal those links describe is aimed at compelling the mexican government into paying the US government for the wall.

And why multiple links describing a single proposal, while no link to the proposal? It's still on Trump's campaign website, so we can all see that it is undeniably talking about the Mexican government paying.

quote:

---

It's an easy decision for Mexico: make a one-time payment of $5-10 billion to ensure that $24 billion continues to flow into their country year after year. There are several ways to compel Mexico to pay for the wall including the following:

- On day 1 promulgate a "proposed rule" (regulation) amending 31 CFR 130.121 to redefine applicable financial institutions to include money transfer companies like Western Union, and redefine "account" to include wire transfers. Also include in the proposed rule a requirement that no alien may wire money outside of the United States unless the alien first provides a document establishing his lawful presence in the United States.

- On day 2 Mexico will immediately protest. They receive approximately $24 billion a year in remittances from Mexican nationals working in the United States. The majority of that amount comes from illegal aliens. It serves as de facto welfare for poor families in Mexico. There is no significant social safety net provided by the state in Mexico.

- On day 3 tell Mexico that if the Mexican government will contribute the funds needed to the United States to pay for the wall, the Trump Administration will not promulgate the final rule, and the regulation will not go into effect.

---

LINK

quote:

---

It's the world we live in. Americans simply don't want to work

this is what happens without migrant labor

---

This video and the similar articles about California's agriculture industry are simply propaganda for the simple minded.

In the first part, they talk about the migrant worker program not limiting the amount of drugs entering the area. Well, no shite. Even if cartels were using migrant workers (which is a very small percentage), do you expect them to just say, "Oh well, we will just give up billions of dollars and not use other methods to ship in our drugs"?

As for Americans not wanting to work, let's look at who they are trying to hire. They went to "the soup kitchens, the streets, and the half-way houses" to find employees. Are you really surprised that a bunch of homeless drug addicts don't want to work? They also complain about white workers not being as productive. Inexperienced people are usually less productive than people that have done the job before. That's not shocking.

No one is against legal immigration and legal worker programs. Comparing legal immigration to illegal immigration is dumb to begin with, but the arguments people use in these videos/articles is extremely weak.

When you bought your used Honda Civic, did you pay all the cash up front for it or did you pay for it over the course of time?

Mexico pays for the wall in less than a year after it is built.

Literally no trump supporter ever thought he meant Mexico was going to cut a check. The only people clinging to that idea are the libs trying to convince people that trump lied.

So, continue believing trump lied. The rest of us will move on to more important issues.

I can see why you were heaitant to post those. From the nbc link you provided:

quote:

---

In his proposal, Trump threatened to change a rule under the USA Patriot Act, an anti-terrorism law, to cut off funds sent to Mexico through money transfers known as remittances. Trump said he would withdraw the threat if Mexico makes "a one-time payment of $5-10 billion" to finance the wall.

---

May not be a novelty sized check, but it sure seems that one trump thought a payment was coming.

Do i need to check the rest of your “homework?”