Started By
Message

re: Re: Roy More. Yes it’s a shame some ‘accusers’ don’t grow balls sooner

Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:04 pm to
Posted by mattloc
Alabama
Member since Sep 2012
4308 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:04 pm to
quote:

You don't see me attacking Menendez's accusers do you?


But you voted for Hillary who tried to destroy Gennifer Flowers "beyond all recognition"?
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:04 pm to
quote:

sure hope you are a better finder of fact than you come across on here.


Uh huh. Well I find as a fact that the “denial” was equivocal. And weird. And it really hurt him b/c it was equivocal and weird.
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

You don't see me attacking Menendez's accusers do you?


They recanted.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14172 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

Then again you may actually have a wife who told you this but luckily your MIL knew her little skank was a liar back in the day and was able to save the family much embarassment, you should show the woman more appreciation.


I assume you are not really this mentally unbalanced in real life and just post this garbage online to get attention.

At least I hope that's the case.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48284 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:09 pm to
quote:

Uh huh. Well I find as a fact that the “denial” was equivocal. And weird. And it really hurt him b/c it was equivocal and weird.


You base your judgments on confirmation bias as well?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48284 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:09 pm to
quote:

They recanted.


Prosecutors didn't buy that. Why do you?
Posted by Perfect Circle
S W Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
6843 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:10 pm to
It's fortunate for you, that you're not standing in front of me right now.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:11 pm to
Why? What would happen, snowflake?
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

Prosecutors didn't buy that. Why do you?


I think Menendez is a sleazeball.

My point here is that Roy faces unrecanted allegations from partially corroborated witnesses. Menendez doesn’t.

Do i think Menendez attended hooker parties in DR? I do. But the underage think is shaky in his case.
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

What would happen, snowflake?


LINK
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:18 pm to
quote:

base your judgments on confirmation bias as well?


I base my judgments on common sense. When thirty people accuse you of something in the political realm, you better fricking deny it clearly.

Posted by EthanL
Auburn,AL
Member since Oct 2011
6963 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:19 pm to
quote:

Well that isn’t very intelligent


This is what I said in the OP:
quote:

Maybe there is a chance some of these accusers are full of it, yeah he is running for a big job


I’m reluctant to believe Roy Moore was some perv in the ‘70s on a mission to find young teenaged girls to hook-up with. But I believe it very possible he had an encounter that was EASY for him to forget about, that appeared consensual, and that maybe a young girl saw differently.

I’m partial to a few of the things said, not all of them
Posted by PurpleandGold Motown
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
21958 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:21 pm to
quote:

It may or may not have happened. But don't try to play that "long-standing rumor" angle. That's just bullshite.


Well, the assistant DA that worked with him in 82 said it was common knowledge he dated high school girls back then. So...
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:21 pm to
quote:

My point here is that Roy faces unrecanted allegations from partially corroborated witnesses


link to any corroboration of illegal acts?
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79646 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:22 pm to
quote:

Well, the assistant DA that worked with him in 82 said it was common knowledge he dated high school girls back then. So...


So why hasn't it been used against him until now?
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:24 pm to
quote:

I assume you are not really this mentally unbalanced in real life and just post this garbage online to get attention.
At least I hope that's the case.


To hell with the littole liar hiding behind his keyboard.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48284 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:31 pm to
quote:

I base my judgments on common sense. When thirty people accuse you of something in the political realm, you better fricking deny it clearly.


Yikes. Glad I wasn't in your jurisdiction when I practiced. Shitty judges are the worst.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:34 pm to
Your wife is 11? Dude, you’re gross
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:36 pm to
quote:

They recanted
Theyre whores. They do what they’re paid up do
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 11/11/17 at 11:38 pm to
quote:

So why hasn't it been used against him until now?

Because the DA is a liar
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram