- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rasmussen: 52% Approval for OUR PRESIDENT
Posted on 2/11/19 at 9:13 am to HTDawg
Posted on 2/11/19 at 9:13 am to HTDawg
quote:
Rasmussen is a bullsh*t, hard right leaning poll that has no credibility.
They were only 1% under on Trump's support in the 2016 election. Closer than the 2-3% under that most other polls were.
So they are probably pretty close to accurate.
0
Posted on 2/11/19 at 9:16 am to tarzana
quote:
Show me a WaPo, CNN, Gallup, Reuters, Ipsos pol
you got it buddy
Posted on 2/11/19 at 9:17 am to tarzana
quote:And yet, Rasmussen UNDER polled Trump in week 1 of November 2016.
Rasmussen is widely known for its republican bias.
I mean, are you guys all just completely immune to history?
Posted on 2/11/19 at 9:17 am to HTDawg
quote:
Trump is a joke and a laughing stock, and everyone knows it, including you.
Lmao great melt!
Posted on 2/11/19 at 9:19 am to HTDawg
step away from the keyboard, warrior. it's over.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 9:20 am to tarzana
quote:Reuters was 1 point lower than Rasmussen in week 1 of Nov 2016. And Rasmussen was lower than the actual result. So. You tell me which one was more biased?
Rasmussen is widely known for its republican bias. Show me a WaPo, CNN, Gallup, Reuters, Ipsos poll. Even Fox is more mainstream than Rasmussen.
Same for CNN.
Same for WaPo.
So, the poll that came closest to correct was the "biased" one?
That's liberal logic for ya.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 9:20 am to Covingtontiger77
As is stated ad nauseam on here: just imagine if there was a balanced MSM, or, imagine if the MSM was for him to the same extent they are against him!
Posted on 2/11/19 at 9:21 am to HTDawg
quote:
Trump is a joke and a laughing stock, and everyone knows it, including you.
That is what you people said in 2016 and then Trump was elected president. How do you account for that? Do you ever realize that you are wrong?
Posted on 2/11/19 at 9:33 am to HTDawg
The joke is melting over a few % points. Whether its absolutely correct is debatable. The fact that it is very close is not.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 9:34 am to Covingtontiger77
quote:
52% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance
MAGA Juice, Draconian, BamaAtl, VOR, Shreveport pig, etc....
Posted on 2/11/19 at 9:36 am to HTDawg
quote:
Trump is a joke and a laughing stock,
Posted on 2/11/19 at 9:38 am to HTDawg
quote:
Rasmussen is a bullsh*t, hard right leaning poll that has no credibility. It doesn't surprise me you would use the conservative outlier poll that's different from all of the others.
Trump is a joke and a laughing stock, and everyone knows it, including you.
About a 6 on the melt scale.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 9:41 am to stelly1025
It gives Bamarep the feelz when MAGA polls triggers the proggies.
Gives the feelz BIGLY.
Gives the feelz BIGLY.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 9:49 am to Covingtontiger77
I’m not a fan of polls and believe they are not accurate
I looked up the last polls for the 2016.
Poll of Polls had HRC winning by 3%. She won the national vote by a little over 3%.
They had Trump winning Nevada by 1%. HRC won inside the margin of error
They had HRC winning Penn 48% to 44%. 8% of the vote was either for 3rd party or undecided. Inside the margin of error.
They had HRC winning Wisc 47% to 40% with 13% undecided or for a 3rd party. Inside the margin of error.
They HRC winning Michigan 48% to 42% with 10% for a 3rd party or undecided, Inside the margin of error.
Why people believe the polls were off was because the undecided went for Trump. Almost all the poll of polls were inside the margin when adding in the undecided.
I believe why there was so many undecided was people didn’t want to say they were voting for Trump.
I looked up the last polls for the 2016.
Poll of Polls had HRC winning by 3%. She won the national vote by a little over 3%.
They had Trump winning Nevada by 1%. HRC won inside the margin of error
They had HRC winning Penn 48% to 44%. 8% of the vote was either for 3rd party or undecided. Inside the margin of error.
They had HRC winning Wisc 47% to 40% with 13% undecided or for a 3rd party. Inside the margin of error.
They HRC winning Michigan 48% to 42% with 10% for a 3rd party or undecided, Inside the margin of error.
Why people believe the polls were off was because the undecided went for Trump. Almost all the poll of polls were inside the margin when adding in the undecided.
I believe why there was so many undecided was people didn’t want to say they were voting for Trump.
This post was edited on 2/11/19 at 9:50 am
Posted on 2/11/19 at 11:17 am to HTDawg
quote:
Rasmussen is a bullsh*t, hard right leaning poll that has no credibility. It doesn't surprise me you would use the conservative outlier poll that's different from all of the others.
Their tracking poll uses the same metrics now as they did under Obama so whether it has a right or left wing skew is irrelevant when comparing trends
Posted on 2/11/19 at 11:58 am to Covingtontiger77
Again, a biased poll created to please the God emperor....he lives for adulation.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 12:05 pm to HTDawg
Hey vermin it uses the exact same methodology every single day
He is up 9 points
Go frick yourself
He is up 9 points
Go frick yourself
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News