- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Rank these options and which ones you’d be in favor of:
Posted on 6/30/26 at 4:27 pm
Posted on 6/30/26 at 4:27 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Several ways forward here given the choice of Roberts/Barrett to nullify the 14th Amendment and extra-constitutionally replace it with their own language:
1) Nullification. States issue birth certificates, and they can just stop issuing them to non-citizens. Roberts/Barrett can deal with the fallout and litigate each birth individually.
2) Pack the court. If Robert wants to be a politician who writes laws instead of a judge, then he can fight with 10 more unelected legislators in robes.
3) Deny entry to all pregnant foreigners.
4) Deny entry to all female foreigners.
5) Require sterilization of all foreign visitors prior to entry.
6) Dissolution of the Union. A nation which can’t even restrict who gets to be a citizen isn’t a nation.
7) Amend the Constitution. This is pointless, because once a judge decides he can rewrite the Constitution at will (as Roberts and Barrett did today), the actual text is meaningless. But this is what most GOP politicians gravitate towards because they are useless.
If you think all these options are not great, understand that that is what happens when unelected judges decide that they are in charge of the country and get to write its laws.
High quality melt, IMO.
This post was edited on 6/30/26 at 4:29 pm
4
Posted on 6/30/26 at 4:33 pm to boosiebadazz
Nullification is an American tradition that Jefferson and Madison both recognized and applied. It needs to be renewed. The idea that one federal court of 9 people decides what’s constitutional or not doesn’t make sense. The states wrote and adopted the constitution. The federal government, of which the Supreme Court is a part, is rarely, if ever going to voluntarily limit its own powers or restore lawful authority to the states.
This post was edited on 6/30/26 at 4:38 pm
Posted on 6/30/26 at 4:34 pm to boosiebadazz
I was hoping you were gonna give the PT faithful a choice of posters we would like to see self exile from the PT forum. 
Posted on 6/30/26 at 5:00 pm to boosiebadazz
#6 is where we’re headed, and I’m in favor of it. No reconciliation with these people is possible.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 5:27 pm to boosiebadazz
What about this one? It's certainly appropriate for the season.
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, . . .
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, . . .
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News