Started By
Message

re: Rand Paul demands Dems return money raised by "sexual predator" Bill Clinton

Posted on 2/8/14 at 6:52 pm to
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
38611 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 6:52 pm to
Barack Obama was a special case; there is nobody on the Left that can match his (former) electoral power. It is the Left's winning, that results in their future losing. That idealistic stuff just don't cut it in the real world.

I can guarantee you that Rand is getting satisfaction of out hammering the Clintons; a lot of decent folk know they are low-life, and have it coming. Election aside...Rand serves the cause of 'social justice' , very well. I can feel the enamel on Bill's teeth chippin.

Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

Being a 69 year old woman is what's going to hurt Hillary.


There are many vibrant, and attractive 69 year old women, having them lumped together with Hilldog is just wrong.
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

One would almost have to be fitted with blinders not to see how discounting Bill's respect for women neutralizes the dems "war on women" rhetoric.


We will have to disagree...I'm married to a hard core democrat and all her friends are hard core democrats and they all love Bill Clinton and could care less that he likes to get his dick wet...

Rand will not succeed in neutralizing the war on women mantra mostly because the idiots in the GOP will keep stepping on their own dicks and pissing them off with losing topics like abortion and birth control.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135434 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

I'm married to a hard core democrat and all her friends are hard core democrats and they all love Bill Clinton
Right. Those women who will sop up a "War on Women" yarn spun to them by a sexual predator are clearly beyond reach. Sad truth.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

I'm married to a hard core democrat and all her friends are hard core democrats


So thats where your fantasies with socialism in single payer come from.

quote:

and they all love Bill Clinton and could care less that he likes to get his dick wet...


How much less?
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

This is not smart at all. It makes him look petty.


Better than any other strategy ive seen the GOP use lately
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 10:04 pm to
All this talk Slick Willie and the "war on women" reminds me of a swipe that Michelle Obama took at Hillary in during Obama's first campaign.

"If you can’t run your own house, you can’t run the White House."


I don't think a guy could get away with saying something like that about Hillary, but I wonder if Elizabeth Warren would go there if she got in the race.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
135764 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 10:13 pm to
Can't argue with what he said. It is the truth.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46166 posts
Posted on 2/9/14 at 7:26 am to
It's like Dennis Miller said. If Hillary didn't know what Bill was up to, she's too stupid to be my president.
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 2/9/14 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Using the alias "Jane", she tried, but this happened ...

Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
87450 posts
Posted on 2/9/14 at 11:26 am to
quote:

There are many vibrant, and attractive 69 year old women, having them lumped together with Hilldog is just wrong.


Helen Mirren, for one.

I don't want her to be President, either.
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 2/9/14 at 5:01 pm to
Rand isn't going to allow the Democrats to use the "War on Women" on him in 2016. I laugh at people who don't understand why he launching these missiles at the Clinton's. It's one of the most shameful and hypocritical moments in feminist history. The hypocrisy is shameful and has been conveniently avoided by the left for years.
Posted by Mr. Misanthrope
Cloud 8
Member since Nov 2012
6334 posts
Posted on 2/9/14 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

“L’audace, l'audace, toujours l'audace!”
Posted by ItNeverRains
Offugeaux
Member since Oct 2007
28166 posts
Posted on 2/9/14 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

Didn't Hillary already do a post-Lewinsky interview 15 years ago?




The Dem party you bow to has fought so hard to make their base borderline retarded, they don't remember 15 minutes ago, much less 15 years ago.

Rand is at least making hardcore feminist accept their hypocrisy by voting for a woman running for an office her husband has dropped semen on other women in.
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 2/9/14 at 10:20 pm to
I think what he's doing is driving a wedge between Bill and Hillary more than anything. If he can paint Bill as a predator and get people to believe it, is Hillary going to trot him out? And will the American people stomach letting the guy live in the White House when his own wife is too ashamed to even stand by him during the election?

Paul knows Hillary is only as strong as Bill is, with the exception of within some segments of the Democratic base. He's simply trying to cut the head off this snake.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/9/14 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

I think what he's doing is driving a wedge between Bill and Hillary more than anything. If he can paint Bill as a predator and get people to believe it, is Hillary going to trot him out? And will the American people stomach letting the guy live in the White House when his own wife is too ashamed to even stand by him during the election?

Paul knows Hillary is only as strong as Bill is, with the exception of within some segments of the Democratic base. He's simply trying to cut the head off this snake.

Ding, ding, ding! I think we have a winner. Paul is trying make Bill radioactive so that Hillary can't use him the way Obama did in 2012.
Posted by Swampcat
Member since Dec 2003
12286 posts
Posted on 2/9/14 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

It may not be at first glance, but it's actually brilliant. You put the Clinton machine on the defensive from the get-go with this war on women nonsense.

Very good point. I agree.
Just hope he don't come up missing or something.
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 2/9/14 at 10:41 pm to
And by the way, sure ML was a woman in the technical sense of the word. But she was 22. Ask any father if their 22-year old college student at LSU is a girl or a woman and see what kind of answer you get.

She was a young, dumb, giggly girl who was pressured into sexual acts by the President of the United States. Even if she did hit on him first, that same father of the LSU girl and everyone else with a reasonable mind would expect any mid-aged male to consider reasoning with the girl that what she was asking for wasn't in her best interest. Worse yet, there was no love involved here that muddied up his thinking: he saw an opportunity to get a piece of arse from a girl who might as well have been pomping on the front lawn of an LSU sorority house and he went for it.

And Hillary stood by the man ...
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 2/9/14 at 10:43 pm to
quote:


So thats where your fantasies with socialism in single payer come from.




quote:

and they all love Bill Clinton and could care less that he likes to get his dick wet...



How much less?


at all.

Lots of people do weird shite. All they cared about was what he was doing for the country during his time in office.

If you honestly think the attacks on bill will influence their opinion of Hillary...well, you're living in a republican wet dream that isn't going to happen.
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 2/9/14 at 10:46 pm to
This forces Hillary to either defend someone accused of sexual harassment or distance herself from someone who'd be sharing the White House with her. Not a very appealing couple of choices there.

It also encourages her to show her hand a bit as to whether she's going to run or not. If she isn't, she'd have no real reason to start defending these attacks.
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram