- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rama Duwaji, wife of Mamdani, is making some very ludicrous claims about Jesus' mother.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:20 am to BugAC
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:20 am to BugAC
quote:
And the phillistines predate the Palestinians.
The Philistines are the Palestinians.
quote:
and modern day Palestine has no relation to the area at the time of Christ.
Still not true. Again, the area was known as Palestine a full 400+ years before Christ. The Romans officially named it that after him, but the connection was there long before. It is the name of a large region conquered by the Philistines.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:23 am to BoarEd
quote:
The Philistines are the Palestinians.
No, they are not. We can do this dance all day. At what point in history does 1 name decry ownership over past generations?
quote:
e. Again, the area was known as Palestine a full 400+ years before Christ.
It was known as Judea/Israel the preceding 900 years before that. And Canaan before that. See my question above. The only reason you are latching onto "she was Palestinian" is to be a contrarian nerd.
This post was edited on 7/9/26 at 10:24 am
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:26 am to BugAC
quote:quote:
The Philistines are the Palestinians.
No, they are not.
Yes, they are.

Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:27 am to BoarEd
And, the most important factor, she was JEWISH. Which is not necessarily begotten of an area, but also a religion. And by current standards, Palestine is (or was) at war with Israel. So if we pretend Mary was alive today, she would be the enemy of current day Palestine due to her religion.
quote:
Palestinians are an Arab ethno-national group primarily in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and diaspora. They are overwhelmingly Muslim (Sunni majority, with a small Christian minority). Their national identity developed in the modern era (especially 19th–20th centuries) within the broader Arab context under Ottoman, British, and later rule.
Jews are an ethno-religious group with origins in the ancient Israelites/Judeans of the Levant. Judaism is both a religion and a peoplehood. Jewish identity is passed through matrilineal descent (in traditional/Orthodox views) or cultural/religious affiliation.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:28 am to Timeoday
quote:
Palestinian woman giving birth under occupation"
The jews are now Rome 2.0
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:29 am to Keltic Tiger
quote:
So back up your facts with facts
Bruuuuh...
You really questioning where Jesus was born and whether it is a place now called Palestine or that it was under Roman occupation at the time?
There was nothing said about him being Muslim. You do realize Palestinian =/= Muslim. There are Christian Palestinians. There were Jewish people living in what is called Palestine prior to the European Jews moving there.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:30 am to BugAC
quote:
And, the most important factor, she was JEWISH
Irrelevant. Palestine was a region in which she lived.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:30 am to BoarEd
quote:
Yes, they are.
No, they are not.
Timeline: Canaan ? Judea ? Palestine
This is a simplified chronological overview of the region's naming and political evolution. Transitions were gradual, with overlapping names depending on perspective, rulers, and context. Dates are approximate.
Bronze Age: Canaan (c. 3000–1200 BCE)
Canaan / Canaanites: Primary name for the land and its Semitic city-state inhabitants.
Egyptian, Mesopotamian, and local records refer to it as Canaan.
Under Egyptian influence in the Late Bronze Age.
Late Bronze to Early Iron Age: Emergence of Israel (c. 1200–1000 BCE)
Collapse of Bronze Age powers (Egypt, Hittites, etc.).
Israelites emerge in the Canaanite highlands (Merneptah Stele mentions "Israel" c. 1208 BCE).
Gradual settlement and cultural distinction from Canaanites.
Iron Age: Kingdoms of Israel and Judah (c. 1000–586 BCE)
United Monarchy (c. 1000–930 BCE, per Bible; debated archaeologically): Saul, David, Solomon. Jerusalem becomes capital.
Split (c. 930 BCE): Northern Kingdom of Israel (Samaria) and southern Kingdom of Judah (Jerusalem).
Kingdom of Judah (c. 930–586 BCE): Southern kingdom; name Yehudah applies to the territory and people. Davidic dynasty rules.
Babylonian / Persian Periods: Yehud / Judea (586 BCE – 332 BCE)
586 BCE: Babylon destroys Jerusalem and the Kingdom of Judah; exile.
Yehud (Babylonian/Persian province): Name persists for the area around Jerusalem.
Jewish return under Persians (c. 538 BCE); Second Temple built.
Hellenistic / Hasmonean Period (332 BCE – 63 BCE)
Alexander the Great conquers; region under Greek (Ptolemaic/Seleucid) influence.
Judea: Greek/Roman term for the Jewish territory/kingdom.
Hasmonean Revolt (167–160 BCE) establishes independent Jewish rule (Judea).
Roman Period: Judea ? Syria Palaestina (63 BCE – 4th century CE)
63 BCE: Romans conquer; Province of Judea.
70 CE: Destruction of Second Temple.
Bar Kokhba Revolt (132–136 CE): Emperor Hadrian renames the province Syria Palaestina (after Philistines) to diminish Jewish ties. Jerusalem becomes Aelia Capitolina.
Post-Roman to Modern Era: Palestine
Byzantine period (4th–7th centuries): Palaestina Prima, Secunda, etc.
Arab/Islamic period (7th century onward): Filastin (Arabic form of Palestine) as a district (Jund Filastin).
Crusaders, Mamluks, Ottomans: "Palestine" used geographically (not a sovereign state).
British Mandate of Palestine (1920–1948): Official modern administrative name.
Post-1948: Region divided; "Palestine" refers to Palestinian territories/national identity
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:35 am to BoarEd
quote:
Irrelevant
To YOUR narrative, correct. To the truth, it is very relevant.
quote:
Palestine was a region in which she lived.
And like the Jews in Israel, Palestine is an Arab ethno-centric group. Do you for 1 minute believe Islamic Mamdani was referrring to geographically located at the time? Because that means absolutely nothing considering modern day Palestine is not 1st century palestine in terms of area.
This is dipshits quote, "Jesus' mother Mary as a "Palestinian woman giving birth under occupation". She was not a Palestinian woman. She would not have referred to herself as a Palestinian woman. And, if you really are arguing that it's the geographic location ownership thus derives her name, then by that rationale, Mary would be a Roman woman, not a Palestinian woman.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:37 am to BoarEd
quote:
I'm sorry you don't like the facts of the matter. But they're still the facts.
Where it gets interesting to me is you can push this all back even farther. What does it mean to be Palestinian? Well, it actually means you're a Greek. ?
The term is derived from the word Philistine, as mentioned earlier. And it turns out the Philistines were the infamous "sea peoples" that conquered the entire region long before Christ was born. These people were pre-classical Greeks. They came in, took over the area, adopted the Canaanite Gods and eventually blended in with the local Levant population. While they adopted the Canaanite Gods publicly, in their private lives they still held European religious beliefs.
So again, like it or not, what the woman says is correct. Why do I care? Because I think all three of the religious groups that argue over this shite are frickin stupid and I'm sick of watching them fight wars and kill people over it.
Look at BoarEd spitting historic facts.
Been giving you upvotes all day my man.
Is something wrong with you today?
Or is it me?
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:40 am to UtahCajun
This is pointless at this point. This other retard is arguing against the frickin etymology of the words relevant to this discussion. 
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:40 am to BoarEd
quote:
BoarEd
No, Mary (mother of Jesus) would not be considered Palestinian in any historical or ethnic sense.
Historical Context
Time period: Mary lived in the 1st century CE (c. 20 BCE – c. 40 CE or later), during the early Roman period.
The region was officially called Judea (part of the Roman province of Judaea). The name change to Syria Palaestina happened after the Bar Kokhba revolt (c. 135 CE), about a century after Mary’s lifetime.
She was a Jewish woman from Nazareth in Galilee (northern Judea/Israel). The Gospels describe her as a descendant of King David (tribe of Judah), betrothed to Joseph (also of the House of David).
Identity Terms
Ethnic/Religious: She was Jewish (Judean/Israelite by heritage and faith). “Jew” at that time referred to people from Judea or those practicing Second Temple Judaism.
Geographic: Residents of the area might be called Judeans. The broader term “Palestinian” (from Palaistine) existed in Greek usage earlier but was not the primary administrative or ethnic label for the local Jewish population.
Modern “Palestinian” identity (Arab, with Levantine roots, primarily Muslim/Christian) developed much later, especially in the 19th–20th centuries under Ottoman and British rule. Applying it retroactively to 1st-century Jews is anachronistic.
People in the region during Mary’s time included Jews, Samaritans, Greeks, Romans, and others. Mary and Jesus were part of the Jewish community in Roman Judea. The land has had many names and overlapping populations over millennia (Canaanites, Israelites, Judeans, etc.), but labeling 1st-century figures as “Palestinian” in the modern national sense does not align with history.
This is similar to not calling ancient Romans “Italians” in the modern nation-state sense. The deep shared Levantine ancestry exists for many groups today, but specific identities are tied to their era.
This post was edited on 7/9/26 at 10:42 am
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:41 am to BoarEd
quote:
This is pointless at this point. This other retard is arguing against the frickin etymology of the words relevant to this discussion
See my post above this one. Argue against that, i'll wait. Just ask AI, was Mary considered Palestinian.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:44 am to BugAC
quote:
See my post above this one. Argue against that, i'll wait. Just ask AI, was Mary considered Palestinian.
Your post above doesn't mention or touch on the fact that, as BoarEd said, the Greeks named it Palestine around 500 BC and Palestine was nothing more than their way of saying Philistine which was the original Egyptian name for the area.
It is like us saying Crete when others say Kriti.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:49 am to UtahCajun
quote:
Your post above doesn't mention or touch on the fact that, as BoarEd said, the Greeks named it Palestine around 500 BC and Palestine was nothing more than their way of saying Philistine which was the original Egyptian name for the area.
I have more posts above that which will help you out.
However, what you and Boared are ignoring is also the context of Mamdani which Boared is agreeing with.
quote:
Modern “Palestinian” identity (Arab, with Levantine roots, primarily Muslim/Christian) developed much later, especially in the 19th–20th centuries under Ottoman and British rule. Applying it retroactively to 1st-century Jews is anachronistic.
quote:
People in the region during Mary’s time included Jews, Samaritans, Greeks, Romans, and others. Mary and Jesus were part of the Jewish community in Roman Judea. The land has had many names and overlapping populations over millennia (Canaanites, Israelites, Judeans, etc.), but labeling 1st-century figures as “Palestinian” in the modern national sense does not align with history.
This is similar to not calling ancient Romans “Italians” in the modern nation-state sense. The deep shared Levantine ancestry exists for many groups today, but specific identities are tied to their era.
But, most importantly, Mary was from Nazareth.
quote:
She was a Jewish woman from Nazareth in Galilee (northern Judea/Israel). The Gospels describe her as a descendant of King David (tribe of Judah), betrothed to Joseph (also of the House of David).
Nazareth is NOT located in modern day Palestine. That makes the ENTIRETY of the argument moot. The rest is just additional reasoning why she would never be considered a Palestinian.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:53 am to UtahCajun
quote:
UtahCajun
Based on the facts given, by today's standard, Mary would NOT be considered a Palestinian. She would be considered Jewish.
By 1st century BCE/CE, Mary WAS considered Jewish.
There is no scenario where Mary would ever be considered anything other than Jewish, until she was considered to be Christian.
This post was edited on 7/9/26 at 10:54 am
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:54 am to BugAC
Damn I loathe all the bickering. It ruins threads 
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:55 am to BugAC
quote:
Mamdani's bride is just trying to rewrite history the way all progressives try to do.
It is working on some of our posters for damn sure.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:56 am to BugAC
From the 5th Century BC and the "father of history."
I'm sorry that your AI got it wrong. What's interesting is that from the earliest mentions, the Palestinians were described as Jews, although not specifically called that.
So again, Jesus was born in a region known as Palestine for 400+ years before his birth, a region that would officially be named such shortly after his death, and in a country that is to this day called Palestine.
Considering there is a group of Christians living in modern day Palestine to this day, this is actually something Christians should embrace. Because it strengthens their ties to congested land. But as I said before, everyone involved in this is frickin stupid and they fight wars over their stupidity.
I'm sorry that your AI got it wrong. What's interesting is that from the earliest mentions, the Palestinians were described as Jews, although not specifically called that.
So again, Jesus was born in a region known as Palestine for 400+ years before his birth, a region that would officially be named such shortly after his death, and in a country that is to this day called Palestine.
Considering there is a group of Christians living in modern day Palestine to this day, this is actually something Christians should embrace. Because it strengthens their ties to congested land. But as I said before, everyone involved in this is frickin stupid and they fight wars over their stupidity.
Popular
Back to top


2




