- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/28/19 at 11:11 am to Crimson Wraith
People always tell you who they are if you pay close enough attention.
Posted on 5/28/19 at 11:15 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:look everybody, i'm an idiot! i only believe in "science"
You inject morality because it's the only bridge you have when "science" runs out
quote:is that a subjective statement or an objective statement?
Morality is subjective
Posted on 5/28/19 at 11:18 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:no, you are merely highlighting the conflict between the 2 policies
But they don't recognize "that" as a person being aborted. Otherwise, it would be illegal
quote:is that an objective statement or a subjective statement?
That's your subjective view of it
Posted on 5/28/19 at 11:19 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
You shifted to "life" and bridged that to "human being" with nothing to connect it
Posted on 5/28/19 at 11:19 am to bfniii
quote:
look everybody, i'm an idiot!
Remember when you tried to pretend you were all about "substance?"
Posted on 5/28/19 at 11:20 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
This is still subjective. You jump from "fetal life" to "human being" because of emotion
That actually works both ways because we know for certain that when it pops out, it's a human being........and therefore, working backwards, one has to say when it was NOT a human being. And, pro-choicers "jump" from "human" to "not human" with the exact same level of capriciousness.
"Science" doesn't support some magic moment where it shifts from human to not human if working backwards.
Posted on 5/28/19 at 11:20 am to bfniii
quote:
no, you are merely highlighting the conflict between the 2 policies
That's something that you manufacture so you have a point. It isn't useful.
Posted on 5/28/19 at 11:21 am to ShortyRob
quote:
That actually works both ways
Correct.
Posted on 5/28/19 at 11:21 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:yet you feel free to continue posting stupid crap on the subject. you're ignorant on the issue. that's all you need to say from now on. or just don't waste everyone's time with your bullcrap juvenile responses
If I knew a definitive and objective answer to that, we wouldn't need to discuss this topic
Posted on 5/28/19 at 11:23 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:ok mr. happy hour. yeah, you've been so erudite and sophisticated on this issue.
I provided a link to Google for you to educate yourself
Posted on 5/28/19 at 11:24 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Which is why I am pro-life.
Correct.
If the development is on a line with the left side being POSSIBLY not human and the right side being DEFINITELY HUMAN......it seems to me that the onus is on the "wanna kill" group to tell us, working backwards, when we shifted away from the DEFINITE.
Obviously, as an atheist, I do not apply a religious test to the subject. It's simple logic to me. I know that at some point, that with only nutjob exceptions, EVERYONE agrees it's not killable.
I start from our point of agreement.
Posted on 5/28/19 at 11:24 am to bfniii
quote:
you're ignorant on the issue.
Your arguments can be narrowed to "sled test" and "moral fact."
You have no room to speak about anyone's ignorance with that sophomoric nonsense forming the basis of your position.
Posted on 5/28/19 at 11:25 am to bfniii
quote:
you've been so erudite and sophisticated on this issue.
I've never made that claim. I've yet to encounter a point worth that effort.
Posted on 5/28/19 at 11:26 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:that thread is still out there partner. whenever you take your lowt meds, hop back over there and see if you can actually contribute something substantive.
Remember when you tried to pretend you were all about "substance?"
or just go back to being a barfly. whichever
Posted on 5/28/19 at 11:26 am to AggieHank86
quote:
One is either a supporter or an opponent of abortion rights,
I support abortion, but I don't know where it became a "right". Certainly not anything in the Constitution or BOR.
Since I do not deny science, I am aware that a human being is being murdered.
Yes, I am a terrible person, however, I believe that if our society is going to progress, then "Progressives" need to keep aborting themselves for the good of all.
Posted on 5/28/19 at 11:26 am to ShortyRob
quote:
If the development is on a line with the left side being POSSIBLY not human and the right side being DEFINITELY HUMAN
Why are those the two sides?
Posted on 5/28/19 at 11:27 am to bfniii
quote:
that thread is still out there partner.
Last I checked, I was waiting for you to address something.
Up to you...
Posted on 5/28/19 at 11:28 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:there we go. customary non response - response from buckeye. "i don't have anything substantive to say so i'm just going to type some words and stuff" right after i take these fries out of the fryer. don't want my boss coming down on me again.
That's something that you manufacture so you have a point. It isn't useful.
Posted on 5/28/19 at 11:29 am to bfniii
quote:
i don't have anything substantive to say
It's interesting to see you whining about this, with how little you've contributed.
Popular
Back to top


0




