Started By
Message

re: Pro Choice?

Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:08 am to
Posted by oman
Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
3280 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Seriously, I support abortion rights philosophically, but Roe is TERRIBLE jurisprudence constitutionally. It is the epitome of a result-driven judicial decision.


I disagree, and am admittedly in the minority. I think it's a good decision trying to resolve an impossible issue. I do find the "private medical decision" aspects of the case to logically fit in with the privacy concerns of the decisions that Roe cites to.
Posted by oman
Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
3280 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Did someone describe you as smug recently?


Yeah, that dude...not too bright.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140540 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:10 am to
Yeah. What was he thinking? Maybe too much drugs.

Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28504 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:11 am to
quote:

For the last 50 years.


share the text with the class
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34162 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:12 am to
quote:

I did a word search, 

can't find it. 


Did Pelosi tear it up?
Posted by AUsteriskPride
Albuquerque, NM
Member since Feb 2011
18385 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:13 am to
quote:

Abortion doesnt spread through contact, you get that right.


You're still a virgin, how precious.
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
26999 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:20 am to
quote:

It’s not murder, at least not to me and many other people. But that an argument that will go nowhere, we will both end up holding the same opinions as when we started. I understand where you’re coming from and respect that I just simply disagree.


This.

I’ll just steal it.
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28504 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Both of us can't be right, though.


exactly. Abortion is one of the only policies that there is a right and wrong answer.

i can't fathom how someone can say there is a biological difference between a BABY at 1 day vs 40 weeks vs 20 years

its the same damn human being from start to finish
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59668 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:26 am to
my body my choice
Posted by oman
Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
3280 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:36 am to
quote:

i can't fathom how someone can say there is a biological difference between a BABY at 1 day vs 40 weeks vs 20 years


I can.

Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23193 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

developing law is focused on viability


Viability is the fulcrum of roe v wade.

Not that I expect trash liberals to have the decency to be consistent for 2 minutes straight.
This post was edited on 4/17/20 at 12:54 pm
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23193 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

I think it's a good decision trying to resolve an impossible issue


Part of the reason it’s terrible is there is no reason for the Supreme Court to resolve it.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23193 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

This.

I’ll just steal it.


Not a good move.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23193 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

The extremists at each end of the spectrum


Hank, you’re doing it again.
Posted by oman
Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
3280 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Viability is the fulcrum of roe v wade.


And yet instead of new laws focusing on viability they focus on things like parental consent and absolutely fraudulent restrictions.

I haven't seen any laws where, for instance, Texas establishes a review procedure to review cases where the fetus is past viability.

Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23193 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

And yet instead of new laws focusing on viability they focus on things like parental consent and absolutely fraudulent restrictions.

I haven't seen any laws where, for instance, Texas establishes a review procedure to review cases where the fetus is past viability.


So?

You attack where the laws are the weakest to fight this monstrosity.

Posted by oman
Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
3280 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

So?

You attack where the laws are the weakest to fight this monstrosity.


So?

So it's a game. If the issue is viability then the laws should be about viability. But they don't go there, because then the issue is clearly about individuals making individual choices.

The parental consent laws are about the government trying to interfere with a constitutionally protected right

Sure, you attack it from all sides if you want to cut the number of abortions back. I just find it interesting that the lawsuits don't focus on the viability issue.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23193 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

If the issue is viability then the laws should be about viability.


The issue isn’t viability, the issue is only viability if you accept Supreme Court trash as respectable law.

If you don’t, the issue still remains the practice of abortion, so you attack it however you can.
Posted by Brazos
Member since Oct 2013
20361 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 1:34 pm to
Just let us know when you’ve had enough of Trump bitch slapping liberals and dragging his nuts across your face.
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6229 posts
Posted on 4/17/20 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Just let us know when you’ve had enough of Trump bitch slapping liberals and dragging his nuts across your face.


Why are you so weird?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram