- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pro Choice?
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:08 am to AggieHank86
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:08 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Seriously, I support abortion rights philosophically, but Roe is TERRIBLE jurisprudence constitutionally. It is the epitome of a result-driven judicial decision.
I disagree, and am admittedly in the minority. I think it's a good decision trying to resolve an impossible issue. I do find the "private medical decision" aspects of the case to logically fit in with the privacy concerns of the decisions that Roe cites to.
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:10 am to roadGator
quote:
Did someone describe you as smug recently?
Yeah, that dude...not too bright.
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:10 am to oman
Yeah. What was he thinking? Maybe too much drugs.
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:11 am to oman
quote:
For the last 50 years.
share the text with the class
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:12 am to TrueTiger
quote:
I did a word search,
can't find it.
Did Pelosi tear it up?
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:13 am to MastrShake
quote:
Abortion doesnt spread through contact, you get that right.
You're still a virgin, how precious.
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:20 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
It’s not murder, at least not to me and many other people. But that an argument that will go nowhere, we will both end up holding the same opinions as when we started. I understand where you’re coming from and respect that I just simply disagree.
This.
I’ll just steal it.
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:23 am to David_DJS
quote:
Both of us can't be right, though.
exactly. Abortion is one of the only policies that there is a right and wrong answer.
i can't fathom how someone can say there is a biological difference between a BABY at 1 day vs 40 weeks vs 20 years
its the same damn human being from start to finish
Posted on 4/17/20 at 11:36 am to SportTiger1
quote:
i can't fathom how someone can say there is a biological difference between a BABY at 1 day vs 40 weeks vs 20 years
I can.
Posted on 4/17/20 at 12:52 pm to oman
quote:
developing law is focused on viability
Viability is the fulcrum of roe v wade.
Not that I expect trash liberals to have the decency to be consistent for 2 minutes straight.
This post was edited on 4/17/20 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 4/17/20 at 12:54 pm to oman
quote:
I think it's a good decision trying to resolve an impossible issue
Part of the reason it’s terrible is there is no reason for the Supreme Court to resolve it.
Posted on 4/17/20 at 12:57 pm to LSU alum wannabe
quote:
This.
I’ll just steal it.
Not a good move.
Posted on 4/17/20 at 12:58 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
The extremists at each end of the spectrum
Hank, you’re doing it again.
Posted on 4/17/20 at 1:01 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Viability is the fulcrum of roe v wade.
And yet instead of new laws focusing on viability they focus on things like parental consent and absolutely fraudulent restrictions.
I haven't seen any laws where, for instance, Texas establishes a review procedure to review cases where the fetus is past viability.
Posted on 4/17/20 at 1:03 pm to oman
quote:
And yet instead of new laws focusing on viability they focus on things like parental consent and absolutely fraudulent restrictions.
I haven't seen any laws where, for instance, Texas establishes a review procedure to review cases where the fetus is past viability.
So?
You attack where the laws are the weakest to fight this monstrosity.
Posted on 4/17/20 at 1:08 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
So?
You attack where the laws are the weakest to fight this monstrosity.
So?
So it's a game. If the issue is viability then the laws should be about viability. But they don't go there, because then the issue is clearly about individuals making individual choices.
The parental consent laws are about the government trying to interfere with a constitutionally protected right
Sure, you attack it from all sides if you want to cut the number of abortions back. I just find it interesting that the lawsuits don't focus on the viability issue.
Posted on 4/17/20 at 1:24 pm to oman
quote:
If the issue is viability then the laws should be about viability.
The issue isn’t viability, the issue is only viability if you accept Supreme Court trash as respectable law.
If you don’t, the issue still remains the practice of abortion, so you attack it however you can.
Posted on 4/17/20 at 1:34 pm to oman
Just let us know when you’ve had enough of Trump bitch slapping liberals and dragging his nuts across your face.
Posted on 4/17/20 at 1:38 pm to Brazos
quote:
Just let us know when you’ve had enough of Trump bitch slapping liberals and dragging his nuts across your face.
Why are you so weird?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News