Started By
Message

re: Pretty disheartening poll: wide majority of even most republicans support wealth taxes

Posted on 11/30/19 at 11:21 am to
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 11:21 am to
quote:

No but maybe you should actually look into why it's so popular instead of generalizing people as jealous

Well it’s either jealousy or idiocy. Because you could take every penny from the wealthy in this country and not even come close to bankrolling this country for even 1 year. It’s a stupid idea.
Posted by 93and99
Dayton , Oh / Allentown , Pa
Member since Dec 2018
14400 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 11:27 am to
quote:

Why would anyone get angry about people so poor the government can't take anything from them?


Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57222 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 11:34 am to
quote:

Because you could take every penny from the wealthy in this country and not even come close to bankrolling this country for even 1 year.
Right. For a moment let’s say we took all of Bezos’s wealth. About $112B (or about 10% of our yearly federal deficit ). And gave it out to the other 300 million Americans equally—about $373 each.

Where are you going to get $112B next year?

Hint: it’s going to come from the people that got the $373 the year before.
This post was edited on 11/30/19 at 11:36 am
Posted by Carl Tuckerson
The wind-swept plains
Member since Oct 2019
1026 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 11:36 am to
quote:

The “rich person” that pays $100 has lost the exact same amount of purchasing power as a “middle class” person that has paid $100. Both $100 buy the exact same amount of bullets for the government. You’re assigning emotional value to alter commodity of money.

Someone starving needs $5 of food more than someone who just ate. This is an incredibly basic principle of economics that is the foundation of the price system. As I've repeatedly said, it's a perfectly reasonable ethical position to say that this need is irrelevant to discussing how taxes should be collected. All you had to say from the jump was "I don't think that the relative importance of the first X amount of dollars of income to a person is relevant to a discussion about distributing tax burdens, because X dollars is X dollars," and we could agree to disagree on its relevance and leave it alone. You didn't have to be a jackass about it and pretend I literally meant that poor people's dollar bills are magically worth more.

quote:

WOW!!! A fortune teller!

The alternative is that you're both too stupid to understand a figure of speech and an arrogant twat when disagreeing with people about ideas. I chose what I thought was the more charitable interpretation, which is that you're out here to feel good about yourself on the Internet, because it's pretty obvious from your behavior that what you're not here for is an honest discussion.
Posted by HueyP
Lubbock
Member since Nov 2008
3155 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 11:38 am to
quote:

Never understood why a flat tax rate with a mandatory minimum tax rate isn’t favorable by all. Say you have a 20% tax rate and regardless of what write offs you take, the mandatory minimum is 12 or 15%. Whatever it takes to make the numbers work.


Would be incredible to be able to do your own taxes. Send the government a check and that’s it.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112613 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 11:42 am to
I agree that a wealth tax is nonsense and it’s completely an appeal to jealously but it’s a mistake to not note how we are getting to the numbers in OP

Broken healthcare system
Skyrocketing student loan debt
Stagnant wages

That’s one reason I like Tucker, he doesn’t just scoff at this fervor, he breaks why we got here and why it’s a problem that isn’t going away with Trump.
Posted by Carl Tuckerson
The wind-swept plains
Member since Oct 2019
1026 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 11:49 am to
Perfectly put. It's easy to laugh at the absurdity of a wealth tax, but the correct thing to do (while dismissing the idea as absurd) is to figure out why people are feeling so squeezed that they reach out to desperate solutions like a wealth tax, and see what can be done to fix it.
Posted by 93and99
Dayton , Oh / Allentown , Pa
Member since Dec 2018
14400 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

Perfectly put. It's easy to laugh at the absurdity of a wealth tax, but the correct thing to do (while dismissing the idea as absurd) is to figure out why people are feeling so squeezed that they reach out to desperate solutions like a wealth tax, and see what can be done to fix it.




Are you fricking kidding me ?

It's ALL about jealousy and/or envy. It's obvious.

If EVERYONE paid something we would be in a better situation.

I am amazed at how different I was brought up (personal responsibility) when compared to people on this board.
Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
14811 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

figure out why people are feeling so squeezed that they reach out to desperate solutions like a wealth tax, and see what can be done to fix it.


Lack of accountability. The "I deserve this" mentality.
Posted by Possumslayer
Pascagoula
Member since Jan 2018
6206 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 12:27 pm to
I’m calling bull shite
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112460 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

If so, the poor would actually pay income taxes. What's a fair share? Hint: it's made up populist drivel.


'There are people who pull the wagon and there are people that ride in the wagon.' ...Ronald Reagan
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6229 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

Which people?


No qualifier required.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57222 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

Someone starving needs $5 of food more than someone who just ate.
Doesn't change the price of the food.

quote:

This is an incredibly basic principle of economics that is the foundation of the price system
Nope. If it was, they’d ask for your income at the grocery store checkout. You’re proving you don’t understand that money is a commodity.

quote:

As I've repeatedly said, it's a perfectly reasonable ethical position to say that this need is irrelevant to discussing how taxes should be collected
Ah. So in your view taxes are a
means for enforcing ethics?

quote:

You didn't have to be a jackass about it
I’ve been nothing but polite to you. Pointing
out the flaws in your logic isn’t being a jackass. Your butthurt is your own choice.

quote:

pretend I literally meant that poor people's dollar bills are magically worth more.
No pretending. You’ve repeatedly asserted that, albeit indirectly.

quote:

I chose what I thought was the more charitable interpretation
No you didn’t. You presumed I’m a jackasss. Classic ad hominem.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57222 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

is to figure out why people are feeling so squeezed that they reach out to desperate solutions like a wealth tax, and see what can be done to fix it.
Just like healthcare... There is no “solution” that doesn’t in love paying for your own stuff yourself. That includes paying for our big bloated government.

Good luck selling personal responsibility, and paying for your own stuff.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57222 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

Which people?
No qualifier required.
So everybody? As in... the almost 50% have to start paying a (-any?) share?
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6229 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

So everybody? As in... the almost 50% have to start paying a (-any?) share?


Is that their fair share? Seems like if the government has deemed them too poor, nothing would be their fair share.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57222 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

Is that their fair share?
You tell me. are you for equality or inequality?

quote:

Seems like if the government has deemed them too poor
If you believe the government is why we have poor people why would you want anyone to pay taxes? Seemingly you’d want it done-away with. What am I missing?

Ultimately if you want a government tat represents all people equally regardless of income... forcing only a slim 10% of the population to fund almost all of it ... and then... expecting equal treatment would seem... backwards.
This post was edited on 11/30/19 at 1:31 pm
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140383 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 1:30 pm to
Everyone pays their fair share? I’m good with that as long as we agree on what that share is. Don’t think that’s possible though.
Posted by 93and99
Dayton , Oh / Allentown , Pa
Member since Dec 2018
14400 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 1:30 pm to
"Personal responsibility or Individual Responsibility is the idea that human beings choose, instigate, or otherwise cause their own actions. A corollary idea is that because we cause our actions, we can be held morally accountable or legally liable."
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6229 posts
Posted on 11/30/19 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

If you believe the government is why we have poor people


What? Not sure where you're pulling this from.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram