- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Portland enacts facial recognition tech ban
Posted on 9/10/20 at 11:09 am
Posted on 9/10/20 at 11:09 am
By city agencies and on public property but also by private entities in places of public accommodation.
Are phone cameras now also illegal in Portland?
Yeah, it was unanimous by the city council.
Are phone cameras now also illegal in Portland?
Yeah, it was unanimous by the city council.
10
Posted on 9/10/20 at 11:18 am to Rougarou4lsu
The Feds can still take all the pics they need, and have been doing so. Don't see any difference, big picture.
Posted on 9/10/20 at 11:25 am to Rougarou4lsu
Posted on 9/10/20 at 11:54 am to Rougarou4lsu
Ummm, pretty much unconstitutional. There is NO - ZERO, ZIP, NADA - expectation of privacy in public. This is all about protecting the terrorist scum that is destroying that city.
Hey, Portlanders! How much is too much? Had enough yet?
Hey, Portlanders! How much is too much? Had enough yet?
Posted on 9/10/20 at 12:00 pm to mtntiger
Invasion of privacy should be unconstitutional. When satellite image facial recognition starts letting strangers on the internet Google your name to see if you're in your home watching tv or out for a walk we will wish this was everywhere
Tbh this is one of the few good things to come out of the city
Tbh this is one of the few good things to come out of the city
Posted on 9/10/20 at 12:03 pm to Tigerfan6969
quote:
Invasion of privacy should be unconstitutional. When satellite image facial recognition starts letting strangers on the internet Google your name to see if you're in your home watching tv or out for a walk we will wish this was everywhere
Yep. Even if the current use of facial recognition technology doesn't scare you, the potential future applications should. This is a scary road to walk down.
Posted on 9/10/20 at 12:07 pm to Rougarou4lsu
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/11/21 at 12:04 am
Posted on 9/10/20 at 12:19 pm to Rougarou4lsu
Taking a picture is not generally a thing that is a public right which could be regulated. A government entity might be able to regulate a public right which involves facial recognition but there is nothing stopping me as a private individual from taking a photo and running it against a database of photos.
Not sure what this means, the constitution is more a public charter for the formation of government and includes specific additional rights and protections which already covered by Rights given by the Creator.
Most of government bodies have a whole slew of statutes governing privacy, generally speaking.
quote:
Invasion of privacy should be unconstitutional. When satellite image facial recognition starts letting strangers on the internet Google your name to see if you're in your home watching tv or out for a walk we will wish this was everywhere Tbh this is one of the few good things to come out of the city
Not sure what this means, the constitution is more a public charter for the formation of government and includes specific additional rights and protections which already covered by Rights given by the Creator.
Most of government bodies have a whole slew of statutes governing privacy, generally speaking.
This post was edited on 9/10/20 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 9/10/20 at 12:24 pm to Rougarou4lsu
I am not actually opposed to this.
But I am opposed to having entitled little shits throwing Molotov cocktails at a federal courthouse and disrupting people’s lives. And they are technically in public wrecking shite, so there is no expectation of privacy.
So I guess I’m conflicted.
But I am opposed to having entitled little shits throwing Molotov cocktails at a federal courthouse and disrupting people’s lives. And they are technically in public wrecking shite, so there is no expectation of privacy.
So I guess I’m conflicted.
This post was edited on 9/10/20 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 9/10/20 at 12:28 pm to efrad
quote:
You really want some leftist pointing a camera at a Trump rally, or at any group/individuals engaging in traditional conservative pastimes, and having an entire list of identities spit out?
Why I agree with you, we all know this is to keep the crime mongers from getting caught.
Posted on 9/10/20 at 12:29 pm to Rougarou4lsu
Tha same people bitching about privacy put their birthdays, homes, cars, vacations, kids etc all over fakebook 
Posted on 9/10/20 at 1:28 pm to Rougarou4lsu
I would be just fine if we established a federal ban on facial recognition technology in this country.
Posted on 9/10/20 at 1:53 pm to Rougarou4lsu
Zero issue with this at all. Seems like a conservative position as opposed to a progressive one (although we all know it is just to protect their rioters).
Posted on 9/10/20 at 1:59 pm to Rougarou4lsu
In Portland all they need is fecal recognition.
Posted on 9/10/20 at 3:21 pm to DeltaTigerDelta
quote:
In Portland all they need is fecal recognition.
You might be thinking about San Francisco!
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News