Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Peter Strzok and Lisa Page- I am Confused by their actions

Posted on 6/3/19 at 1:58 pm
Posted by Covingtontiger77
Member since Dec 2015
10247 posts
Posted on 6/3/19 at 1:58 pm
Kind of piggybacking off of the email regarding the unwritten 302s got me thinking.


These two people were for all intents and purposes mid level FBI grunts.

Has it ever been explained why two mid-level FBI grunts were:

A) Seemingly Acting alone in contriving their “insurance” plan against Trump’s election?


Doesn’t it seem odd that these two would risk their careers and or lives by engaging in such a lone wolf project?


I find it hard to believe that these two mid level beurocrats went rogue on their own.


Is that what we are supposed to believe?


Has this been discussed on Fox or anywhere?

This post was edited on 6/3/19 at 1:59 pm
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21874 posts
Posted on 6/3/19 at 1:59 pm to
Peter Strzok was upper 10% of FBI

Page was 50% to 60% level
This post was edited on 6/3/19 at 2:00 pm
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25097 posts
Posted on 6/3/19 at 2:01 pm to
I'm not sure why you think they were mid-level. They were in the upper echelon, just not the uppermost. Strzok was the top counterintelligence special agent. Lisa Page looked to be right below Baker in the legal counsel's office.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42593 posts
Posted on 6/3/19 at 2:05 pm to
Didn’t they talk about an issue discussed in ‘Andy’s’ office during that ‘insurance policy’ text.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79090 posts
Posted on 6/3/19 at 2:05 pm to
mid-level baws don't get involved in the framing of a Presidential candidate then President.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39452 posts
Posted on 6/3/19 at 2:18 pm to
He was prominent in the Hillary Clinton email investigation as well.
He originally served on Mueller's SC and was removed when text revelations were made in the media.

This crooked mf'er had his fingers in all of this, and its worth noting the STARK contrasts in how he behaved in each respective investigation - bending over backward to excuse away HRC's criminal behavior, while doing the exact opposite for Trump.
Posted by Ollieoxenfree99
Member since Aug 2018
7748 posts
Posted on 6/3/19 at 2:18 pm to
Don't both have Iranian ties?
This post was edited on 6/3/19 at 2:19 pm
Posted by Old Character
Member since Jan 2018
861 posts
Posted on 6/3/19 at 3:12 pm to
A better question is why do have an “A)” and no “B)”?

Posted by kmdawg17
'Murica
Member since Sep 2015
1524 posts
Posted on 6/3/19 at 3:15 pm to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123898 posts
Posted on 6/3/19 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

mid level FBI grunts.
negative.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79090 posts
Posted on 6/3/19 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

He was prominent in the Hillary Clinton email investigation as well.


IMO they are one in the same. They knew they weren't going to charge her nor did they even actually really look into it. Hell, they opted for no criminal referral before they even interviewed her
Posted by westide
Bamala
Member since Sep 2014
2882 posts
Posted on 6/3/19 at 5:41 pm to
What is confusing? They liked to email, text, and screw. Not necessarily in that order. They also liked to email and text about Trump, but most of all they liked to screw Trump.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram