- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: P Hegseth calls on Judge Reyes to report to Fort Benning at 0600 to instruct Army Rangers
Posted on 3/23/25 at 4:42 pm to LaMigra
Posted on 3/23/25 at 4:42 pm to LaMigra
quote:
I swear Hank and SFP either live together or are the same loser
Grandiose delusions are a type of false belief that can negatively impact a person's psyche. They involve exaggerated beliefs about self-worth, power, knowledge, or identity.
Fits them perfectly.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 4:47 pm to NYNolaguy1
The CONSTITUTION says the President is Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, not some judge. That trumps anything the judge can cite.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 4:47 pm to LaMigra
quote:
I swear Hank and SFP either live together or are the same loser
I think just cut from the same condescending cloth. Hank was banned from Texags at one point and then took on an alter during the Covid years, which was eventually perma-banned as well. He is a paid professional, just not in the channel he claims to be.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 5:35 pm to OU81TOO
quote:
Hank was banned from Texags at one point and then took on an alter during the Covid years, which was eventually perma-banned as well
Yeah I remember that loser on texags
Posted on 3/23/25 at 5:39 pm to VOR
You come into a thread to look like an idiot and think you are triggering people. Cognitive dissonance 101
Posted on 3/23/25 at 5:49 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
what you should have learned is that (in some circumstances) the judicial branch has the authority to rule upon the legality or constitutionality of actions of the executive branch.
What you should have learned is that this isn't one of them.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 5:53 pm to OU81TOO
quote:
I think just cut from the same condescending cloth. Hank was banned from Texags at one point and then took on an alter during the Covid years, which was eventually perma-banned as well. He is a paid professional, just not in the channel he claims to be.
Interesting. Makes sense
Posted on 3/23/25 at 5:58 pm to FLTech
I’m very likeable in real life. Many good friends
Posted on 3/23/25 at 6:10 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
what you should have learned is that (in some circumstances) the judicial branch has the authority to rule upon the legality or constitutionality of actions of the executive branch.
Your so dumb. Just an absolute idiot. LoL
Posted on 3/23/25 at 6:16 pm to ninthward
quote:
But it’s not demeaning to women to have men pretend to be women.
The sad thing is that Reyes believes Tranny's are a biological gender. You know, the ones that believe men can menstruate and get get pregnant.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 6:18 pm to VOR
quote:
I’m very likeable in real life. Many good friends
So you’re just a complete moron on here?
Posted on 3/23/25 at 6:20 pm to VOR
Good friends like pedo, libtards, trans activists? If so, then stay in your community as the majority of Americans do not want you or your kind in their neighborhood.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 6:20 pm to Lou Pai
quote:
People can shite on McConnell all they want but this is exactly why dominating the judiciary is so important.
He played the game.
He and other R's still allowed 235ish? radical leftist judges last year to where Chuck U. Schumer was bragging about it just this week.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 6:56 pm to stout
i think it would be funny for pete to do this.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 7:20 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:I believe the allegation is that it violates the equal protection clause. As I said earlier today, I think the administration ends up winning this onequote:I'd love to see which statute authorized a judge to dictate personnel policy within our armed forces. If there's a section of the constitution that I missed please point it out.
what you should have learned is that (in some circumstances) the judicial branch has the authority to rule upon the legality or constitutionality of actions of the executive branch.
It is silly to get your panties in a wad about a TRO, which delays implementation of a new policy for a week to 10 days, until full hearing can be held.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 7:22 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:LoL indeed.
Your so dumb. Just an absolute idiot. LoL
Posted on 3/23/25 at 7:28 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Okie boy asked the question, STD
It’s the name of a Van Halen album genius.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 7:51 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
It is silly to get your panties in a wad about a TRO,
If a judge is issuing a TRO, it means he is inclined to believe the plaintiff on some level until arguments are heard.
If we are letting TRO's fly, I am sure we can find a judge who thinks women in combat is an awful idea, or giving pilot slots based on race maybe a little discriminatory. Hello Pandora's box.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 8:32 pm to ninthward
Its the ultimate form of the Patriarchy. Men pretending to be women. Invading their spaces. Speaking for women. Taking their recources. Then using violence to silence anyone who calls them out on their charade.
Popular
Back to top
