- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Overpopulation
Posted on 11/21/17 at 9:10 am
Posted on 11/21/17 at 9:10 am
It seems that world overpopulation is rarely discussed as a problem? Is it too politically incorrect? Seems like a good argument for liberals for abortion. Reducing or abating population growth would also help to address pollution, greenhouse gases, etc. China tried to address their overpopulation with birth limits and were vilified for it. Is there just no viable solution?
Posted on 11/21/17 at 9:12 am to DArbonneDuke
White perch biting yet? I know someone who needs to know.
Posted on 11/21/17 at 9:13 am to DArbonneDuke
China is going to have a problem sooner or later because for years you could only have one child and most people wanted males. Many female infants were aborted or killed early in life. They have a severe shortage of females right now because of their policies.
Birth control/education/sterilization are better choices than abortion.
Birth control/education/sterilization are better choices than abortion.
Posted on 11/21/17 at 9:16 am to Crimson Wraith
China has too many males.
India has too many unwed females IIRC, to the point where bachelors are discouraged from traveling in some areas lest they be kidnapped and forced to marry.
Sounds like there could be a theoretical solution to that problem that neither side are likely to consider.
India has too many unwed females IIRC, to the point where bachelors are discouraged from traveling in some areas lest they be kidnapped and forced to marry.
Sounds like there could be a theoretical solution to that problem that neither side are likely to consider.
Posted on 11/21/17 at 9:17 am to DArbonneDuke
Whenever you bring up the subject of overpopulation you have to address those continents, countries and ethnicity of people most responsible.
That's where you usually get in trouble.
That's where you usually get in trouble.
Posted on 11/21/17 at 9:18 am to teke184
Yep. Most races in that region don't like interracial mixing, especially on a large scale.
Posted on 11/21/17 at 9:19 am to DArbonneDuke
because overpopulation doesn't exist long term in a free market capitalist system absent a welfare state
People only reproduce beyond the carrying capacity (which is dependent on nature, innovation, and land utilization) when they're paid to do so or are otherwise subsidized by governments.
People only reproduce beyond the carrying capacity (which is dependent on nature, innovation, and land utilization) when they're paid to do so or are otherwise subsidized by governments.
This post was edited on 11/21/17 at 9:21 am
Posted on 11/21/17 at 9:19 am to Crimson Wraith
Wasn't necessarily advocating abortion, but overpopulation IS a problem and I'm just not hearing anyone address it. No loud advocacy groups like other issues.
Posted on 11/21/17 at 9:21 am to DArbonneDuke
Anyone who thinks the world is overpopulated should start first by offing themselves.
Posted on 11/21/17 at 9:27 am to Seldom Seen
Anyone who thinks the world isn't overpopulated is too self centered for a frank discussion.
Posted on 11/21/17 at 9:27 am to DArbonneDuke
quote:
It seems that world overpopulation is rarely discussed as a problem? Is it too politically incorrect?
Malthus was discussing it over 200 years ago.
Posted on 11/21/17 at 9:56 am to kingbob
quote:
because overpopulation doesn't exist long term in a free market capitalist system absent a welfare state People only reproduce beyond the carrying capacity (which is dependent on nature, innovation, and land utilization) when they're paid to do so or are otherwise subsidized by governments.
Ya, "overpopulation" isn't a problem in of itself. If you think about it, it doesn't make sense as a problem. You can't have more people than resources to support it. People die on the fringes where resources are scarce.
Now, what is a problem, and is always a problem no matter what population you have, is resource destruction. A sudden loss of that would be a problem, but that is largely an independent issue and the amount of people who die from such a situation depends on how much and how sudden those resources are destroyed.
Posted on 11/21/17 at 10:09 am to DArbonneDuke
Europe and the US has low birth rates, China's one child policy has left them with a lopsided male population, and the Middle East, South America and African populations are exploding. We are watching idocracy take place in front of our eyes.
Posted on 11/21/17 at 10:13 am to DArbonneDuke
We don't have an overpopulation problem yet and even if we did, would you be in favor of murder to solve it? If so, how do you decide who gets murdered?
Posted on 11/21/17 at 10:21 am to DArbonneDuke
See the "field stones" in south georgia. no one knows who erected them and it's a monument to the new world order and keeping the population down. Look it up on wikipedia
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News