- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: O'Keefe uncovers voter fraud....20 times in NC
Posted on 11/3/14 at 2:28 pm to SirWinston
Posted on 11/3/14 at 2:28 pm to SirWinston
quote:
I just think that a lot of the stuff O'Keefe does is kind of like "well, duh".
The problem with his voter fraud stuff is that he's catching only little fish. Campaigns are massive with tons of low level staffers and volunteers with zero true connection to the moral/ethical angle of the campaign itself. So I would guess he could be successful in finding some random Democratic volunteers or staffers who will bend the rules. We could do the same for GOP campaigns too.
I do think there is voter fraud, but I don't think it is determinative and I don't know why GOP entities are spending so much focus on it. For the record, I do think ID laws are perfectly acceptable, I just think the motivations are a little iffy.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 2:37 pm to SpidermanTUba
If I walk into a bank and demonstrate to the bankers a means to defraud them of money. I have not committed a punishable offense, and the bank has not lost anything. However, would it not be prudent for the bank to take measure to prevent it from being defrauded in the manner I demonstrated?
So there was no punishable offense committed in obtaining the ballots. That should not absolve the state from permitting conditions to exist that make the punishable offense so easy to commit, and difficult to detect. The state of North Carolina has been made aware of the potential for abuse, and it should take reasonable measure to reduce that potential.
So there was no punishable offense committed in obtaining the ballots. That should not absolve the state from permitting conditions to exist that make the punishable offense so easy to commit, and difficult to detect. The state of North Carolina has been made aware of the potential for abuse, and it should take reasonable measure to reduce that potential.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 2:39 pm to Pettifogger
Agreed. The only elections voter fraud really impact are local ones. That doesn't mean there shouldn't be anything done about it, but I think the current push for Voter ID goes overboard and ultimately they're designed to l, at best, discourage certain people from voting, and at worst disenfranchise certain voters. I'm okay with requiring photo ID to vote so long as the ID's are free to those who don't have any other form of ID and are simple to acquire.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 3:03 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
quote:
(No message)
Best post you've ever made.
Downvoted anyway
I admit, I laughed.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 3:20 pm to Poodlebrain
quote:
If I walk into a bank and demonstrate to the bankers a means to defraud them of money. I have not committed a punishable offense, and the bank has not lost anything
If you honestly think you can walk into a bank and take every step needed to make a fraudulent withdrawal except actually taking the money in hand and turn around and say "Hey bank, look, I almost defrauded you and one of your depositors! You should thank me!" and NOT get arrested - you are the dumbest fricker ever to post anything anywhere in the UNiverse.
This post was edited on 11/3/14 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 11/3/14 at 3:44 pm to SpidermanTUba
Journalists are given some leeway when uncovering fraud, corruption etc. David Gregory broke the law on national TV by possessing a gun clip and showing it on national television. It may not be right but it's like that.
This post was edited on 11/3/14 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 11/3/14 at 4:02 pm to SpidermanTUba
I posed a hypothetical. Instead of addressing the hypothetical you attack me as stupid for posing a ridiculous hypothetical. It just so happens that my hypothetical is not really a hypothetical. Banks actually do hire people to help them address security weaknesses. LINK
I guess I'm only the second dumbest fricker ever to post anything anywhere in the UNiverse since you are clearly more stupid.
I guess I'm only the second dumbest fricker ever to post anything anywhere in the UNiverse since you are clearly more stupid.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 4:45 pm to Poodlebrain
quote:
Banks actually do hire people to help them address security weaknesses.
quote:
If I walk into a bank
Is one of those people YOU?
quote:
I guess I'm only the second dumbest fricker ever to post anything anywhere in the UNiverse since you are clearly more stupid.
So stupid I wasn't able to read a part of your hypothetical that you didn't actually write, the part where you preface "If I walk into a bank" with "If a bank hires me to detect their security weaknesses, and..." Sorry, I must have been really stupid to not see those words especially considering THEY WERE NOT THERE.
This post was edited on 11/3/14 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 11/3/14 at 4:48 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:It
If you honestly think you can walk into a bank and take every step needed to make a fraudulent withdrawal
is
done
all
the
time.
All the time. The banks pay people to try.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 4:52 pm to Pettifogger
quote:Agree with all of this, and I'll try to explain why they make such a huge deal out of voter fraud.
I do think there is voter fraud, but I don't think it is determinative and I don't know why GOP entities are spending so much focus on it. For the record, I do think ID laws are perfectly acceptable, I just think the motivations are a little iffy.
It's because it gives them someone or something to blame. How nice is it to be able to say,"We're going to win, but if we don't, it's because they cheated!"
You're guaranteed to feel like a winner or a victim, but never a loser.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 4:53 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The banks pay people to try.
Poodlebrain gets paid to walk into banks and try to defraud them?
He never mentioned that.
How much did the polling precincts pay O'Keef?
This post was edited on 11/3/14 at 4:53 pm
Posted on 11/3/14 at 4:55 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:In a thread dealing with voter fraud weaknesses identified!
So stupid I wasn't able to read a part of your hypothetical that you didn't actually write, the part where you preface "If I walk into a bank" with "If a bank hires me to detect their security weaknesses, and..."
Turns out Democrat's GOTV efforts may well focus on chronic non-voters as blank sheets awaiting Democrat surrogates, instead of asking the chronic non-voters to show up in person.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 6:26 pm to BugAC
Ya'll dint seriously see the flaw in this logic???
OK, so here it is....this guy is going out and committing voter fraud and yall are making the leap that this means that voter fraud is occurring. This would be akin to me going out and robbing a bank to prove that bank robberies happen.
So, who is it that is going out and voting in North Carolina after years of not voting? I imagine yall are making the claim that one person is able to what, vote 20 ballots, without being caught. So how many people are doing this? There were about 4.5 million people who voted in North Carolina in 2012 for the president of the united states. There were 90000 more people who voted for Mitt Romney than Obama...so, in order for voter fraud to have made a difference there would have had to have been 4500 different people casting 20 illegal ballots each, all for one candidate, without any trace of it having occurred. there would have had to have been some sort of concerted effort for this to have happened...unless yall are suggesting that it is simply lone wolves doing it, at which point yall are fricked...there is no way to stop 4500 individuals from breaking the law if they individually decide to do so.
And now for the kicker....yall are under the impression that somewhere in the neighborhood of 4000 people could've voted illegally 20 times in the last presidential election in North Carolina and made a difference in the election in that state and this proof that voters should have to have id to cast a ballot. 4000+ people could commit a serious crime 20 times each without getting caught and ya'll dont think they could come up with a frickING FAKE ID that every freshman at Duke and UNC and NC State has in their possession??? How incredibly stupid do you have to be to buy this shite??? Do you sincerely think that the same people who would allow this criminal that y'all are holding forth as proof of a wide spread and incredibly complex conspiracy to commit voter fraud on a large scale couldn't be fooled by a fake ID that is available for $20???? Really????
And here is the kicker....yall have proof that this guy did this 20 times and therefore it means that it happens in real life...lets accept that. Yall have to be convinced that only Democrats are doing it....and if so once again you are willing to admit that the democrats have outwitted the GOP...to the tune of what, 90,000 criminal acts going un-noticed...and the only proof the GOP can conjure up are stories like these??? And yall want those morons in control of the security of the entire free world?? What in the frick is wrong with you people????
OK, so here it is....this guy is going out and committing voter fraud and yall are making the leap that this means that voter fraud is occurring. This would be akin to me going out and robbing a bank to prove that bank robberies happen.
So, who is it that is going out and voting in North Carolina after years of not voting? I imagine yall are making the claim that one person is able to what, vote 20 ballots, without being caught. So how many people are doing this? There were about 4.5 million people who voted in North Carolina in 2012 for the president of the united states. There were 90000 more people who voted for Mitt Romney than Obama...so, in order for voter fraud to have made a difference there would have had to have been 4500 different people casting 20 illegal ballots each, all for one candidate, without any trace of it having occurred. there would have had to have been some sort of concerted effort for this to have happened...unless yall are suggesting that it is simply lone wolves doing it, at which point yall are fricked...there is no way to stop 4500 individuals from breaking the law if they individually decide to do so.
And now for the kicker....yall are under the impression that somewhere in the neighborhood of 4000 people could've voted illegally 20 times in the last presidential election in North Carolina and made a difference in the election in that state and this proof that voters should have to have id to cast a ballot. 4000+ people could commit a serious crime 20 times each without getting caught and ya'll dont think they could come up with a frickING FAKE ID that every freshman at Duke and UNC and NC State has in their possession??? How incredibly stupid do you have to be to buy this shite??? Do you sincerely think that the same people who would allow this criminal that y'all are holding forth as proof of a wide spread and incredibly complex conspiracy to commit voter fraud on a large scale couldn't be fooled by a fake ID that is available for $20???? Really????
And here is the kicker....yall have proof that this guy did this 20 times and therefore it means that it happens in real life...lets accept that. Yall have to be convinced that only Democrats are doing it....and if so once again you are willing to admit that the democrats have outwitted the GOP...to the tune of what, 90,000 criminal acts going un-noticed...and the only proof the GOP can conjure up are stories like these??? And yall want those morons in control of the security of the entire free world?? What in the frick is wrong with you people????
Posted on 11/3/14 at 6:33 pm to germandawg
quote:
OK, so here it is....this guy is going out and committing voter fraud and yall are making the leap that this means that voter fraud is occurring.
I think you missed the connection. One guy did it 20 times, and yet there are people that say it doesn't exist. That was the point of the exercise. Did you miss that?
The rest of your post is crap.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 6:37 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
O'Keefe
Complete tool... Wasn't he trying to bug Senator Landreniu's office?
Anyway, unless he catches others doing it then there is no crime. Now, NC should close this loophole to avoid someone from getting ideas. Just fix the the problem.
Posted on 11/3/14 at 6:37 pm to Al Dante
quote:
I think you missed the connection. One guy did it 20 times, and yet there are people that say it doesn't exist. That was the point of the exercise. Did you miss that?
The rest of your post is crap.
Anyone who claims it doesn't happen is as stupid as anyone who claims it happens often enough to make a difference. There are all sorts of ways to commit voter fraud...who has ever seriously claimed that it had never happened??? if any "pundit" makes that claim they are simply stupid lying. Who has made this claim???
Posted on 11/3/14 at 6:46 pm to germandawg
quote:
Who has made this claim???
Eric Holder for one.
quote:
My colleagues and I are acting aggressively to ensure that every American… can exercise his or her right to participate in the democratic process, unencumbered by unnecessary restrictions that discourage and discriminate or that disenfranchise in the name of a problem that doesn’t exist,”
Posted on 11/3/14 at 6:55 pm to Al Dante
quote:
Eric Holder for one.
quote:
My colleagues and I are acting aggressively to ensure that every American… can exercise his or her right to participate in the democratic process, unencumbered by unnecessary restrictions that discourage and discriminate or that disenfranchise in the name of a problem that doesn’t exist,”
Saying that something doesn't happen and that something is "a problem that doesn't exist" is not the same thing. I can categorically say that unicorns do not cause auto accidents. This not the same thing as my saying that the number of accidents caused by unicorns is not significant.
Eric Holder is right, it is a problem that does not exist....because it happens in such small doses that it does not tweak the system. This is in no way suggesting that it doesn't happen. I dont think anyone can name a pundit who has tried to make this claim without taking their words or meaning out of context.
Popular
Back to top



2




