Started By
Message

re: Oil price chart: Dec 18 to today..

Posted on 2/21/21 at 7:41 am to
Posted by Little Trump
Florida
Member since Nov 2017
5817 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 7:41 am to
Biden, the fake president

Not my president!
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
10404 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 7:53 am to
quote:

Interesting, why did prices plummet in 2015?


Main reason was the hit to the demand side from China

They came out with a correction to their growth rate that went from double digits to like 7% and the price of oil fell off a cliff.

Bottom line, there was way too much supply for the world demand. If I recall, before the crash, in 2014 the supply/demand equation was fairly balanced. The world consumed like 93 mm barrels a day and world production was about the same. Then Bam! China threw a monkey wrench with their projection of a slowdown or maybe an admission that they were lying about their growth rate. Oil prices plummeted. The supply /demand equation got upside down and Stockpiles started piling up .

The US continued to produce high levels of oil though. Exploration in the gulf halted though as prices were too low to justify that. Fracking took off.


This post was edited on 2/21/21 at 7:55 am
Posted by COAUTiger
Lil town called Nunyogotdambidness
Member since Jun 2012
352 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 10:24 am to
Slidell, I think I get what you are saying. Some regulations change the industry in ways that are not obvious right away but has a butterfly effect. Is that what you are saying? Or am I missing your point?

Do you think a president has a direct effect immediately on the price of oil?

Do you agree that OPEC+ sets the price of oil with their quotas? I know speculators have a huge affect, but I don't think most folks understand how they work.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19479 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 10:30 am to
Domestic oil and gas production providing cheaper energy and energy independence was strengthening our economy. Now O'Xiden will strengthen OPEC instead.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19479 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 10:35 am to
quote:

The President can effect the cost to produce oil in the US. Not the price of oil on the international market.

If you blame Biden, you need to blame Trump as well. I do not but you cannot lay blame to one party when you are trying to create that narrative.


President* Biden started crimping domestic production on day one. Trump opened the spigot. That's both a material difference of consequence and a signal to industry that there are government head winds coming. Policies have consequences.
This post was edited on 2/21/21 at 10:37 am
Posted by COAUTiger
Lil town called Nunyogotdambidness
Member since Jun 2012
352 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 12:00 pm to
1968
Personally, I am not giving blame or credit to any president so please don't take this wrong. The original topic of the thread is that the current President is THE reason why oil prices have increased.

I do apologize if anyone has misunderstood what I was trying to say or if I misunderstood what you were trying to say but when people type "you are dumb" and give no evidence, well, you get really defensive.

What I was trying to say is you cannot look at the price of oil in any short time span and say, "see this jump/decrease in oil price, that is because of President X".

I think you are saying our previous President was greatly responsible for oil prices under his term. But when I look at the oil charts, I primarily see OPEC+ and other shocks in supply or demand affecting the price more than anything you can point at an say "see, this was him". At the end of 2 Presidents back, oil prices were actually lower than the late 2010's but somewhat still within the price range OPEC+ targets during the mid 2010's.

The topic of the thread is you can see they price change today is directly related to the current President. But based on previous trends, I do not see how one can say that.

Slidell - If I understood correctly you were showing a butterfly effect, can you agree that when these type of things happen, there are so many other wildcards also at play that is is actually difficult to give direct price credit/blame to any one individual?

dafif - A role in my job is as an analyst (but not for the oil industry, that's a hobby). I am a numbers guy. I think we can both agree that we process information differently and probably will not be able to get each other to see eye to eye. That will lead to only arguing and personally, I don't enjoy that.
This post was edited on 2/21/21 at 12:26 pm
Posted by LSUTigers9458
Member since Nov 2012
1372 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 2:36 pm to
A lot of people don’t want to admit, President Trump wasn’t good for the oil and gas business. He was for the consumer, hence the low gasoline prices. That’s bad for the oil industry when the price is low but is good for Americans in general.

The foreign oil issue is one we will never get away from in our lifetime. The crude oil produced in North America is a light, sweet crude which is good for making gasoline etc in refineries. It is not however good for making diesel which takes a heavier, sour crude with a lot of impurities to refine. Our refineries in the US were also built for Brent Crude not WTI, the infrastructure isn’t in place for that and would take a decade for the switch. So we will always need foreign oil for diesel consumption. We also protect Saudi Arabia, our missiles are staged at all their refineries. Their oil we need, our protection, they need. If the US were to walk out of there tomorrow, Iran would take them over similar to how Hitler took Poland in WWII.

Another question for people to ponder....Who uses more diesel than anyone on the planet? The US Military....I think most everyone else gets the picture from there from a geopolitical aspect regarding oil and gas...
Posted by COAUTiger
Lil town called Nunyogotdambidness
Member since Jun 2012
352 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 2:59 pm to
Thanks 9458, that was informative about the refineries.
I tried to discuss this in a thread several weeks ago to try to show the duplicity of low gas/oil prices vs healthy oil industry. But I got cussed at and people telling I was for a political party and biased. Not a healthy discussion so I dropped it.

In another thread, someone mentioned withholding military. I found it interesting how they would allow pretty much or biggest ally in OPEC+ to fall into Iran's hand over $10 oil price increase.
This post was edited on 2/21/21 at 3:05 pm
Posted by COAUTiger
Lil town called Nunyogotdambidness
Member since Jun 2012
352 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 3:12 pm to
One more question. The Canadian oil sand oil, that's nasty stuff. Do we refine it here in the states? Is it primarily used here in the states? I saw a 60 Mins story about 7 years ago where China had a big contact for that oil. Was that accurate?
Posted by LSUTigers9458
Member since Nov 2012
1372 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 3:27 pm to
I’ve been in the industry for 15 years, I voted for Trump twice but the intelligent ones in my industry who can drop their own bias for independent thought know that energy independence is a myth based on our need for foreign oil via diesel consumption. This coupled with the fact that the US shale boom and the recklessness of US operators large and small drove the price of oil down significantly before the COVID stuff killed demand. We need to stabilize the oil markets again. OPEC is being responsible in that regard, most everyone would rather have 5 years of $75-80 bbl oil vs 3 of triple digit oil. You want a gradual increase of price per bbl for long term stability in O&G, not sudden shockwaves. This also achieves consistency and stability in the industry regarding qualified and experienced personnel so you are much more efficient with your projects and costs etc. These sudden shockwaves are lightning in a bottle and wreak havoc on consistency in the industry and ultimately as fast as it rises, is as hard as it falls.

In addition, gradual increases in price per bbl are less of a shock to consumers rather than a skyrocket overnight.
This post was edited on 2/21/21 at 3:29 pm
Posted by LSUTigers9458
Member since Nov 2012
1372 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 3:33 pm to
There is some truth to the Chinese activity in regards to purchasing oil and gas leases and rights in TX and OK and trying to fund some projects but honestly it hasn’t been enough to even put a drop in a bucket.

I wish people would stop making the Keystone Pipeline such a big deal lol that pipeline was part of President Trump’s new trade agreement with Canada when he changed the trade agreements with Mexico and Canada. Canada requested this in the new trade agreement to move their oil from Alberta.

The US didn’t lose anything by shutting down the pipeline, the number of jobs lost was much much smaller and they were only temporary anyway for the US.

Regarding the Iran/Saudi question, you have to look back in the oil embargo of the 70s, the formation of OPEC but also Nixon getting the petrodollar to where oil can only be traded in USD. Saudi is the largest producer of oil in the world and also has the largest proven reserves by a long shot. Their wells are lifetime producers unlike the high decline wells here in the US shale plays. Again, we need their oil, they need our protection, this relationship goes far back as stated above. Interesting fact also, the largest refinery in the US (Motiva Port Arthur) is wholly owned by Saudi Arabia. This was done quietly under Obama’s administration. Democrats love big oil, they just aren’t so loud about it nowadays.

Ever notice why Saddam and Qaddafi were killed? It wasn’t political uprising, it was that they attempted to trade their countries’ oil for a form of gold currency which is bypassing the USD. The United States and other world powers are not going to allow that. There is so much more than what most think they know about the industry.
This post was edited on 2/21/21 at 3:41 pm
Posted by COAUTiger
Lil town called Nunyogotdambidness
Member since Jun 2012
352 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 3:49 pm to
Thank you sir! So interesting!

I know a lot of people think fracking was great for the oil industry but a lot of information I have read states it ultimately lead to a lot of reckless loans and now defaults. The banking industry is now gun shy from US oil and much more favorable to tech lending. Thoughts on that?

I am nieve about how bypassing USD is a big no no. Can you go into more detail? Or maybe a link to help explain.

Well fine sirs/madams, I have chores to do. I will check back but if this thread difts away, I would like to thank you for the cordial, informative conversation!
This post was edited on 2/21/21 at 4:21 pm
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
5569 posts
Posted on 2/24/21 at 3:53 pm to
You oil and gas guys are ok w $4 gal gas this summer and the havoc it wreaks on the rest of the economy
Posted by keks tadpole
Yellow Leaf Creek
Member since Feb 2017
7579 posts
Posted on 2/24/21 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

Who uses more diesel than anyone on the planet? The US Military.

Now that makes sense.
What are grade oil are the shale frackers pulling out of ground?
I would assume light in TX and heavier in PA?
Is South America oil heavy?
quote:

petrodollar

Is there any credence to the notion that China's endgame is a petro-yuan?
This post was edited on 2/24/21 at 4:08 pm
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46065 posts
Posted on 2/24/21 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

Ever notice why Saddam and Qaddafi were killed? It wasn’t political uprising, it was that they attempted to trade their countries’ oil for a form of gold currency which is bypassing the USD. The United States and other world powers are not going to allow that. There is so much more than what most think they know about the industry.


This ^^^ is also why bitcoin and other crypto currencies will eventually be addressed by the Fed/Global Banking Cabal. Same thing with gold and other precious metals, the banks will do everything in their power to maintain control over their fiat currency scam.
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
47131 posts
Posted on 3/5/21 at 12:48 pm to
Up nearly $30 per barrel to $66.50 since 11/2 now; or around 80% since the election.

I'm moving my $75 per barrel prediction up to 7/2021 from 7/2022.

This post was edited on 3/5/21 at 12:49 pm
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
11806 posts
Posted on 3/5/21 at 12:55 pm to
prices will go up, but jobs wont follow as we are restricting our production so all the extra money will go to OPEC, Russia, China
This post was edited on 3/5/21 at 12:56 pm
Posted by Gus007
TN
Member since Jul 2018
11979 posts
Posted on 3/5/21 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

The President can effect the cost to produce oil in the US. Not the price of oil on the international market.

Tell us how Reagan and the Saudi's were able to destroy the Soviet Union.
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
47131 posts
Posted on 3/5/21 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

prices will go up, but jobs wont follow as we are restricting our production so all the extra money will go to OPEC, Russia, China


Refineries will find ways to boost their daily output to cash in on the higher gas prices so you will see projects starting in those existing plants.

You may even see Shell Convent crank back up before Summer, or, possibly its sale for someone else to re-start.

New exploration will not occur under this Administration of Retards, though.
This post was edited on 3/5/21 at 1:03 pm
Posted by LSUTigers9458
Member since Nov 2012
1372 posts
Posted on 3/5/21 at 1:20 pm to
Spot on with this assessment, whoever moved their prediction to 07/2021 for 75/bbl is correct. Goldman Sachs and Bank of America have already called 75 bbl in the 3rd quarter. These folks know far ahead of time, we’re already involved in the Middle East again with Syria and “Rebels” have hit a Saudi Aramco refinery with missiles. In spite of all of that, Saudi still openly states they aren’t raising production. They know what they’re doing and this is a global effort to which we are participants in raising the price of oil.

In addition to the price increase, how do you think this administration is going to get Americans on the electric vehicle bandwagon? Make prices 7-8 dollars a gallon long term at the pump, when that happens, the government will give tax breaks and rebates etc for folks to buy electric and people will most certainly have no choice due to the financial squeeze of gasoline prices. It’s real simple when you look at it.
This post was edited on 3/5/21 at 1:23 pm
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram