- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Oh no, tariff bros. Hermes is increasing the price of their Birkin bags. $20k to $22k.
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:46 am to GumboPot
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:46 am to GumboPot
quote:
Their costly clutches start at around $20,000 and reach well into the six-figures — meaning the current 10% tariff on goods from the European Union could see a spike of around $2,000.
Hoping this applies over here.
Do you recall all of the celebrity and generally wealthy leftists who for years stated they wanted to pay more taxes... time to show how truthful you were with the virtue signaling. Or you can leave the country, like Rosie O'Donnell.
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:53 am to GumboPot
I do love me some outfits but Birkin Bags are ridiculous.
Posted on 4/18/25 at 9:01 am to Wednesday
Please send the weekend cleaning lady back to my she shed before I get back from Siesta Key. <3
Posted on 4/18/25 at 9:02 am to GumboPot
didn't the little Chinese dude just come out and say these only take about 1500 to make?
Posted on 4/18/25 at 9:07 am to GumboPot
I have to admit, I love a nice bag, Coach, Kate Spade, or Frye. But I would never pay more that $500.00 for one, much less 1000's of dollars!
I know some of you men might think $300-$400 for a bag is crazy, but I get one every few years and last for years and years. I spent many years trying to explain this to my husband, I'm not sure if he got it or he just got tired of me trying to expalin it to him!
I know some of you men might think $300-$400 for a bag is crazy, but I get one every few years and last for years and years. I spent many years trying to explain this to my husband, I'm not sure if he got it or he just got tired of me trying to expalin it to him!
Posted on 4/18/25 at 9:22 am to BamaMamaof2
quote:
I have to admit, I love a nice bag,
Not gonna lie, i had a Dooney and Bourke from the 90s that lasted until the 2016 flood and looked as good as the day i got it second hand. All weather leather and all. Not knocking nice stuff at all. To a point, anyway.
Posted on 4/18/25 at 10:39 am to BarberitosDawg
quote:
I think you have to go through a process before you can purchase one of the bags, you’ll be spending a lot more before you get to bag level. If you get caught selling one I think you get banned from the list for life.
Rolex is doing something similar as well.
You have to build a spend history. Hermes can look you up by name and see everything you have ever bought from a boutique. My wife started about 17 years ago in her last year of residency. You start buying scarves, small leather goods, non-allocation bags, and their less expensive jewelry. Back then you didn't have to have a massive spend history just fairly regular purchases over 4-5 years and then you were allowed to buy "allocation bags". The allocation bags are the Constance, Kelly, and Birkin. Even then there was a strung secondary market and you could get over retail for even well used bags. Today it is crazy (the crypto boom during COVID fueled a lot of it like watches) and it takes much longer and a lot more money spent.
Hermes doesn't seem to worried about women that hold a bag for a year and sell them. They don't like immediate flippers but they are hard to catch because the bags don't have serial numbers (they do have date codes) so unless it is a very limited bag they would have a hard time tracking it unless someone sold it on the internet under their own name.
Watch companies pretend to be concerned about flippers but really don't do much as a company. Many individual dealers will cut you off if they catch you flipping watches quickly.
Brands only care so much because the crazy secondary market prices drive interest and demand. Even though I don't flip watches it is rather satifying to know when you leave the store with a new watch you could sell it for twice what you paid immediately. The people that really hate the process are the people who weren't buying when it was easy to get what you want and so they are stuck on the outside looking in because they were born to late or got into watches (or bags) too late to have a fairly simple road to becoming a preferred customer.
While I would never suggest bags or watches as a viable investment asset class the following is true:
Despite my wife's closet having enough orange in it that it looks like walking into a Home Depot she has effectively spent less money on her bags than a woman that bought a single purse from Temu, even factoring in the time value of the money.
I have a large accumulation of watches including many of the hype pieces from Patek, AP, Vacheron, and Rolex and again even adjusting for the time value of the money laid out initially I have spent less money than someone that bought a single G-shock.
Popular
Back to top


0







